Holmes v. Jennison. 39 US (14 Pet) 540, 616 (1840).
2.
City of New York v. Miln, 36 U.S. (11 Pet.) 102, 9 L.Ed. 648 (1837).
3.
Pennsylvania Legislator's Municipal Deskbook, 2003 Oct. Pennsylvania General Assembly, Local Government Commission. What is the “police power”?; 2003 Oct. [cited 2003 Nov 3]. Available from: URL: http://www.lgc.state.pa.us/deskbook03/Issues17.pdf
4.
GostinLOSapsinJWTeretSPBurrisSMairJSHodgeJGJr. The Model State Emergency Powers Act: Planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases. JAMA2002;288:622–8.
5.
MoultonAD. What drives public health law reform?Seminar Series, Center for Health Policy and Research, The University of Iowa College of Public Health;2003 Apr 4; Iowa City, IA.
6.
HodgeJG. Establishing a national model for public health law. Seminar Series, Center for Health Policy and Research, The University of Iowa College of Public Health; 2003 Apr 19; Iowa City, IA.
7.
UNAIDS (Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS). Criminal law, public health and HIV transmission: A policy options paper. Geneva (Switzerland): UNAIDS; 2002. Also available from: URL: http://www.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACP859.pdf
8.
RichardsEP. Collaboration between public health and law enforcement: The constitutional challenge. Emerg Infect Dis2002 Oct [cited 2003 Aug 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol8no10/02-0465.htm
9.
Smith v. Turner. 48 US (7 How) 283, 340–41 (1849).
10.
ParmetWE. AIDS and quarantine: The revival of an archaic doctrine. Hofstra L Rev1985;14:53–90.
11.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat) 1 (1824).
12.
GostinLOBurrisSLazzariniZ. The law and the public's health: A study of infectious disease law in the United States. Colum L Rev1999;99:78–88; 59–128.
13.
Ex parte McGee, 105 Kan. 574, 581, 185 P 14, 16 (1919).
14.
Calder v. Bull, 3 Dallas 386–389 (1798).
15.
ReynoldsGHKopelDB. The evolving police power: Some observations for a new century. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, Spring 2000;511–37.
16.
Berman v. Parker, 348 US 26, 32 (1954).
17.
U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment.
18.
ParmetWE. Legal rights and communicable disease: AIDS, the police power, and individual liberty. J Health Polit Policy Law1989;14:741–71.
19.
MindesP. Tuberculosis quarantine: A review of legal issues in Ohio and other states. J Law Health1995–1996;10:403–28.
20.
Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
21.
GostinLO. Public health in a new century. Part II: Public health powers and limits. JAMA2000;283:2979–84.
22.
StoddardTBRiemanW. AIDS and the rights of the individual: Toward a more sophisticated understanding of discrimination. Milbank Q1990;68(Suppl 1):143–74.
23.
GostinLOBurrisSLazzariniZMaguireK. Improving state law to prevent and treat infectious disease. Milbank Memorial Fund; 1998 [cited 2004 Sep 6]. Available from: URL: http://www.milbank.org/reports/010130improvinglaw.html.
ParmetWE. Legal rights and communicable disease: AIDS, the police power, and individual liberty. J Health, Polit, Policy Law1989 Winter;14:741–71.
38.
GiffinRStrattonKChalkR. Childhood vaccine finance and safety issues: Despite past successes, childhood vaccination faces serious challenges, including a contentious political climate and emerging disease threats. Health Aff (Millwood)2004;23:98–111.
39.
FriedlanderER. Opposition to immunization: A pattern of deception. Sci Rev Alt Med2001;5:18–23.
40.
ZimmermanR. Danish study finds no links between vaccine and autism. The Wall Street Journal2002 Nov 7; Sect. D-4.
41.
Com. v. Pear, Com. v. Jacobson, 67 LRA 935, 183 Mass. 242, 66 NE 719 (Mass., Apr 02, 1903).
42.
Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 US 158 (1944).
World Health Organization. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): Status of the outbreak and lessons for the immediate future. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2003.
National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). Public Health Advocacy. Bio-terrorism funds and funding cuts: Making the case against supplantation [cited 2003 Nov 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.naccho.org/advocacydoc710.cfm
50.
U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8.
51.
RichmanS. The Commerce Clause: Route to omnipotent government. 1995 Aug. Future of Freedom Foundation [cited 2003 Oct 7]. Available from: URL: http://www.fff.org./freedom/0895g.asp
52.
BernsteinD. Equal protection for economic liberty: Is the Court ready?The Cato Institute 1992 Oct [cited 2003 Aug 27]. Available from: URL: http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-181es.html
53.
United States v. Darby, 312 US 100 (1941).
54.
ParmetWE. After September 11: Rethinking public health federalism. J Law Med Ethics2002;30:201–11.
55.
Acorn v. Edwards, 81 F3d 1387, 1388 (5th Cir. 1996).
56.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, US, 116 SCt 2240, 2245–46 (1996).
57.
Cippolone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 US 504, 513–516 (1992).
58.
HodgeJGJr. Implementing modern public health goals through government: An examination of new federalism and public health law. J Contemp Health Law Policy1997;14:93–126.
Bioterrorism: CDC's public health response. Statement by Kevin Yeskey, MD, Director, Bioterrorism Preparedness Response Program, CDC, before the House Committee on Veterans Affairs, Subcommittee on Health, 107th Congress, 1st Sess. (April 10, 2002). Also available from: URL: http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t020410.html
61.
Greater New York Hospital Association. Testimony of the Greater New York Hospital Association on health care response and emergency coordination in the event of nuclear, biological or chemical attack at a public hearing held before the New York Council Committee on Health and Committee on Public Safety; 2003 April [cited 2004 Apr 7]. Available from: URL: http://www.gnyha.org/testimony/2003/pt20030415.pdf.
62.
The Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, Workgroup on Bioterrorism Preparedness. Providing a framework for public health action and bioterrorism preparedness: Recommendations for federal funding of public health activities; 2001 Oct [cited 2004 Jan 7]. Available from: URL: http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/center/mission/papers/docbtfunding010202.html
63.
TurnockBJ. Public health preparedness at a price: Illinois. The Century Foundation [report]2003 [cited 2004 Jan 15]. Available from: URL: http://tigger.uic.edu/∼bturnock/IllinoisBT.pdf
World Health Organization, Communicable Disease Surveillance & Response. Severe acute respiratory syndrome in Singapore; 2003 Sept 10 [cited 2003 Nov 3]. Available from: URL: http://www.who.int/csr/don/2003_09_10/en/
The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. Draft Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. Articles II, V, and VI. Prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001 Dec 21. Also available from: URL: http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf
GostinLOHodgesJGJr. Public health emergencies and legal reform: Implications for public health policy and practice. Pub Health Rep2003;118:477–9.
70.
The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities. Draft Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. Article V, Section 503. Prepared for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2001 Dec 21. Also available from: URL: http://www.publichealthlaw.net/MSEHPA/MSEHPA2.pdf
71.
Centers for Disease Control (US). Use of quarantine to prevent transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome—Taiwan, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2003;52(29):680–3.
72.
SpeakmanJGonzalez-MartinFPerezT. Quarantine in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and other emerging infectious diseases. J Law Med Ethics2003;31(Suppl. 4):63–4.
73.
HearneSAHamburgMASegalL. SARS and its implications for U.S. public health policy: “we've been lucky.”Biosecur Bioterror2004:2:127–31.
74.
BarberaJMacintyreAGostinLInglesbyTO'TooleTDeAtleyC. Large-scale quarantine following biological terrorism in the United States: Scientific examination, logistics and legal limits, and possible consequences. JAMA2001; 286:2711–7.