Patient Perceptions and Acceptance of Routine Emergency Department HIV Testing

Abstract

Objectives.

We report on the rates of patient acceptance and their perceptions of routine emergency department (ED) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in a high-prevalence area.

Methods.

We analyzed the race/ethnicity of patients who either accepted or declined a routine HIV test that was offered to all patients in the ED of a large academic center. We also distributed a patient perception survey about ED HIV testing.

Results.

During the study period, an HIV screening test was offered to 9,826 patients. Of these, 5,232 patients (53%) accepted the test. The acceptance rate of HIV testing was highest among African American patients (55%), followed by 52% for white, 50% for Hispanic, and 42% for Asian patients. A total of 1,519 completed surveys were returned for analysis. The most common reasons for declining a test were that patients did not perceive themselves to be at risk for HIV (49%) or they had recently been tested for HIV (18%). Overall, 84% of patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test in the ED. When analyzed by ethnicity, 89% of African American patients stated they would recommend to a friend to get an HIV test if the friend went to the ED, but only 74% of white patients would do so.

Conclusions.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 recommendations on HIV screening are well accepted by the target populations. Further work at explaining the risk of HIV infection to ED patients should be undertaken and may boost the acceptance rate of ED HIV screening.

References

Branson

Handsfield

Lampe

Janssen

Taylor

Lyss

, Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006;55(RR-14):1–17; quiz CE1–4.

McKenna

HIV testing: Should the emergency department take part?

Ann Emerg Med 2007;49:190–2.

Brown

Shesser

Simon

Bahn

Czarnogorski

Kuo

, Routine HIV screening in the emergency department using the new US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines: Results from a high-prevalence area. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007;46:395–401.

Stata Corp. Stata: Version 9.0. College Station (TX): Stata Corp.; 2007.

Irvin

C Babcock

Wyer

Gerson

; The Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group. Preventive care in the emergency department, part II: Clinical preventive services—an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1042–54.

Rothman

Ketlogetswe

Dolan

Wyer

Kelen

. Preventive care in the emergency department: Should emergency departments conduct routine HIV screening? A systematic review. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10:278–85.

Hutchinson

Corbie-Smith

Thomas

Mohanan

del Rio

Understanding the patient's perspective on rapid and routine HIV testing in an inner-city urgent care center. AIDS Educ Prev 2004;16:101–14.

Liddicoat

Losina

Kang

Freedberg

Walensky

. Refusing HIV testing in an urgent care setting: Results from the “Think HIV” program. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2006;20:84–92.

Anonymous or confidential HIV counseling and voluntary testing in federally funded testing sites—United States, 1995–1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48(24):509–13.

10.

Voluntary HIV testing as part of routine medical care—Massachusetts, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(24):523–6.

11.

HIV prevalence, unrecognized infection, and HIV testing among men who have sex with men—five U.S. cities, June 2004–April 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2005;54(24):597–601.