We assessed Boston-area men who have sex with men (MSM) in terms of their knowledge of partner notification (PN)/partner counseling and referral services (PCRS) and intentions to use such services if exposed to/infected with a sexually transmitted disease (STD) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the future.
Methods.
The study used a convenience sample of STD clinic patients (n=48) and a modified respondent-driven sampling method (n=70) to reach a diverse sample of MSM (total sample n=118) in Massachusetts. Participants completed a one-on-one, open-ended, semistructured qualitative interview and quantitative survey.
Results.
Overall, white, HIV-infected MSM had the highest level of knowledge about PN activities. MSM who were unfamiliar with PN were disproportionately nonwhite and HIV-uninfected. Participants were more likely to notify past partners of HIV exposure than STD exposure. The preferred method of PN for the majority of MSM was direct person-to-person notification. Notably, nonwhite participants were more likely to endorse Massachusetts Department of Public Health PN services than white MSM, who preferred involvement of primary care providers.
Conclusions.
PN is an important public health strategy for treating and preventing STDs and HIV among at-risk populations, especially MSM who engage in sexual behavior with anonymous or otherwise non-notifiable sexual partners. Although many MSM had an understanding of the ethical desirability of informing exposed partners and recognized the value of preventative behaviors, they require further education to overcome barriers to PN as well as to gain knowledge of the various methods of both traditional and nontraditional notification, such as Internet PN.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). HIV/AIDS surveillance report, 2005. Vol. 17. Rev ed. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, CDC (US); 2007.
2.
HandsfieldHHSchwebkeJ.Trends in sexually transmitted diseases in homosexually active men in King County, Washington, 1980–1990. Sex Transm Dis1990;17:211–5.
3.
JudsonFN. Fear of AIDS and gonorrhea rates in homosexual men. Lancet1983;2:159–60.
4.
MartinJLGarciaMABeatriceST. Sexual behavior changes and HIV antibody in a cohort of New York City gay men. Am J Public Health1989;79:501–3.
5.
CDC (US). STD surveillance 2004: Special focus profiles: Men who have sex with men. 2004.
MayerKHKlausnerJDHandsfieldHH. Intersecting epidemics and educable moments: Sexually transmitted disease risk assessment and screening in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis2001;28:464–7.
8.
MathewsCCoetzeeNZwarensteinMLombardCGuttmacherSOxmanA, Strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2001:CD002843.
9.
MathewsCCoetzeeNZwarensteinMLombardCGuttmacherSOxmanA, A systematic review of strategies for partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV/AIDS. Int J STD AIDS2002;13:285–300.
10.
MimiagaMJFairADTetuAMNovakDSVanderwarkerRBertrandT, Acceptability of an Internet-based partner notification system for sexually transmitted infection exposure among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health2008;98:1009–11.
11.
MimiagaMJTetuAMGortmakerSKoenenKCFairADNovakDS, HIV and STD status among MSM and attitudes about Internet partner notification for STD exposure. Sex Transm Dis2008;35:111–6.
12.
CDC (US). HIV partner counseling and referral services—guidance. Atlanta: CDC (US); 1998.
PassinWFKimASHutchinsonABCrepazNNerbstJHLylesCM, A systematic review of HIV partner counseling and referral services: Client and provider attitudes, preferences, practices, and experiences. Sex Transm Dis2006;33:320–8.
15.
FentonKAPetermanTA. HIV partner notification: Taking a new look. AIDS1997;11:1535–46.
16.
HogbenMMcNallyTMcPheetersMHutchinsonAB. The effectiveness of HIV partner counseling and referral services in increasing identification of HIV-positive individuals: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med2007;33(2 Suppl):S89–100.
17.
HoxworthTSpencerNEPetermanTACraigTJohnsonSMaherJE. Changes in partnerships and HIV risk behaviors after partner notification. Sex Transm Dis2003;30:83–8.
18.
KissingerPMalebrancheD.Partner notification: A promising approach to addressing the HIV/AIDS racial disparity in the United States. Am J Prev Med2007;33(2 Suppl):S86–7.
19.
MenzaTWDe LoreJSFlemingMGoldenMR. Partner notification for gonococcal and chlamydial infection in men who have sex with men: Success is underestimated by traditional disposition codes. Sex Transm Dis2008;35:84–90.
20.
WestGRStarkKA. Partner notification for HIV prevention: A critical reexamination. AIDS Educ Prev1997;9(3 Suppl):S68–78.
21.
Carballo-DieguezARemienRBensonDADolezalCDecenaCUBlankS.Intention to notify sexual partners about potential HIV exposure among New York City STD clinics' clients. Sex Transm Dis2002;29:465–71.
22.
Internet use and early syphilis infection among men who have sex with men—San Francisco, California, 1999–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2003;52(50):1229–32.
23.
GorbachPMAralSOCelumCStonerBPWhittingtonWLGaleaJ, To notify or not to notify: STD patients' perspectives of partner notification in Seattle. Sex Transm Dis2000;27:193–200.
24.
HogbenMPaffelJBroussardDWolfWKenneyKRubinS, Syphilis partner notification with men who have sex with men: A review and commentary. Sex Transm Dis2005;32(10 Suppl): S43–7.
25.
MayerKHMimiagaMJVanDerwarkerRGoldhammerHBradfordJB. Fenway Community Health's model of integrated community-based LGBT care, education, and research. In: MeyerIHNorthridgeME, editors. The health of sexual minorities: Public health perspectives on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender populations. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC; 2006. p. 693–715.
26.
HeckathornD.Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems1997;44:174–99.
27.
MagnaniRSabinKSaidelTHeckathornD.Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS2005;19Suppl 2:S67–72.
28.
PollackLMOsmondDHPaulJPCataniaJA. Evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's HIV behavioral surveillance of men who have sex with men: Sampling issues. Sex Transm Dis2005;32:581–9.
29.
MimiagaMJGoldhammerHBelanoffCTetuAMMayerKH. Men who have sex with men: Perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sex Transm Dis2007;34:113–9.
30.
KnowltonRMcCuskerJStoddardAZapkaJMayerK.The use of the CAGE questionnaire in a cohort of homosexually active men. J Stud Alcohol1994;55:692–4.
31.
EwingJA. Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA1984;252:1905–7.
32.
MayfieldDMcLeodGHallP.The CAGE questionnaire: Validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry1974;131:1121–3.
33.
StraussACCorbinJ, editors. Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Inc.; 1997.
34.
QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo ®: Version 7. Doncaster, Victoria (Australia): QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2006.
35.
SPSS Inc.SPSS: Version 15.0.1 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc.; 2006.
36.
CDC (US). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2003. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2004.
37.
KimAAKentCMcFarlandWKlausnerJD. Cruising on the Internet highway. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2001;28:89–93.
38.
BoldingGDavisMHartGSherrLElfordJ.Gay men who look for sex on the Internet: Is there more HIV/STI risk with online partners?AIDS2005;19:961–8.
39.
McFarlaneMBullSSRietmeijerCA. The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. JAMA2000;284:443–6.
40.
ToomeyKERothenbergRB. Sex and cyberspace-virtual networks leading to high-risk sex. JAMA2000;284:485–7.
41.
HoffmanJAKleinH.Social policy implications of partner notification for substance abusers who test HIV-positive. Research in Social Policy1998;6:17–38.
42.
RogersSJTrossSDoino-IngersolJWeisfuseI.Partner notification with HIV-infected drug users: Results of formative research. AIDS Care1998;10:415–29.
43.
MaherJEPetersonJHastingsKDahlbergLLSealsBShelleyG, Partner violence, partner notification, and women's decisions to have an HIV test. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2000;25:276–82.
44.
RothenbergKHPaskeySJReulandMMZimmermanSINorthRL. Domestic violence and partner notification: Implications for treatment and counseling of women with HIV. J Am Med Womens Assoc1995;50:87–93.
45.
PaviaATBenyoMNilerLRiskI.Partner notification for control of HIV: Results after 2 years of a statewide program in Utah. Am J Public Health1993;83:1418–24.
46.
GoldenMRHogbenMPotteratJJHandsfieldHH. HIV partner notification in the United States: A national survey of program coverage and outcomes. Sex Transm Dis2004;31:709–12.
