The Positive Role of Social Networks and Social Networking Technology in the Condom-Using Behaviors of Homeless Young People

Abstract

Objective.

To examine the impact of condom-using peers in the social networks of homeless young people, differences in behaviors were assessed based on the social location of ties (home-based vs. street-based) and how those ties are maintained (face-to-face vs. via social networking technology).

Methods.

“Ego-centric” social network data were collected from 103 currently sexually active homeless young people aged 16–26 years in Los Angeles, California. Associations between condom use and the condom-using behaviors of social network influences were assessed using standard logistic regression.

Results.

About 52% of respondents had a street-based peer who was a condom user. Having such a peer was associated with a 70% reduction in the odds of having unprotected sex at last intercourse. About 22% of respondents had a condom-using, home-based peer with whom they communicated only via social networking technology. Having such a peer was associated with a 90% reduction in risky sexual behavior and a 3.5 times increase in safer sex behavior.

Conclusion.

The study revealed several implications for new human immunodeficiency virus-prevention interventions that mobilize these networks and social networking technologies.

References

Ringwalt

Greene

Robertson

McPheeters

. The prevalence of homelessness among adolescents in the United States. Am J Public Health 1998;88:1325–9.

Stricof

Kennedy

Nattell

Weisfuse

Novick

. HIV seroprevalence in a facility for runaway and homeless adolescents. Am J Public Health 1991;81(Suppl):50–3.

Schalwitz

Goulart

Dunnigan

Flannery

. Prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) and HIV in a homeless youth medical clinic in San Francisco. Presented at the Sixth International Conference on AIDS; 1990 Jun 20–23; San Francisco.

Pfeifer

Oliver

. A study of HIV seroprevalence in a group of homeless youth in Hollywood, California. J Adolesc Health 1997;20:339–42.

Unger

Kipke

Simon

Montgomery

Johnson

. Homeless youths and young adults in Los Angeles: Prevalence of mental health problems and the relationship between mental health and substance abuse disorders. Am J Community Psychol 1997;25:371–94.

Whitbeck

Hoyt

Yoder

. A risk-amplification model of victimization and depressive symptoms among runaway and homeless adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 1999;27:273–96.

Tyler

Hoyt

Whitbeck

Cauce

. The effects of a high-risk environment on the sexual victimization of homeless and runaway youth. Violence Vict 2001;16:441–55.

Rice

Milburn

Rotheram-Borus

Mallett

Rosenthal

. The effects of peer-group network properties on drug use among homeless youth. Am Behav Sci 2005;48:1102–23.

Booth

Zhang

. Conduct disorder and HIV risk behaviors among runaway and homeless adolescents. Drug Alcohol Depend 1997;48:69–76.

10.

Kipke

Montgomery

Simon

Iverson

. “Substance abuse” disorders among runaway and homeless youth. Subst Use Misuse 1997;32:969–86.

11.

Greene

Ennett

Ringwalt

. Substance use among runaway and homeless youth in three national samples. Am J Public Health 1997;87:229–35.

12.

Clatts

Davis

Sotheran

Atillasoy

. Correlates and distribution of HIV risk behaviors among homeless youths in New York City: Implications for prevention and policy. Child Welfare 1998;77:195–207.

13.

Ennett

Federman

Bailey

Ringwalt

Hubbard

. HIV-risk behaviors associated with homelessness characteristics in youth. J Adolesc Health 1999;25:344–53.

14.

Fors

Rojek

. A comparison of drug involvement between runaways and school youths. J Drug Educ 1991;21:13–25.

15.

Johnson

Aschkenasy

Herbers

Gillenwater

. Self-reported risk factors for AIDS among homeless youth. AIDS Educ Prev 1996;8:308–22.

16.

Rotheram-Borus

Meyer-Bahlburg

Rosario

Koopman

Haignere

Exner

. Lifetime sexual behaviors among predominantly minority male runaways and gay/bisexual adolescents in New York City. AIDS Educ Prev 1992;Suppl:34–42.

17.

Yates

MacKenzie

Pennbridge

Cohen

. A risk profile comparison of runaway and non-runaway youth. Am J Public Health 1988;78:820–1.

18.

Whitbeck

Hoyt

. Nowhere to grow: Homeless and runaway adolescents and their families. Hawthorne (NY): Aldine de Gruyter: 1999.

19.

Tyler

. Social network characteristics and risky sexual and drug related behaviors among homeless young adults. Soc Sci Res 2008;37:673–85.

20.

Johnson

Whitbeck

Hoyt

. Predictors of social network composition among homeless and runaway adolescents. J Adolesc 2005;28:231–48.

21.

Rice

Milburn

Rotheram-Borus

. Pro-social and problematic social network influences on HIV/AIDS risk behaviours among newly homeless youth in Los Angeles. AIDS Care 2007; 19:697–704.

22.

Rice

Stein

Milburn

. Countervailing social network influences on problem behaviors among homeless youth. J Adolesc 2008;31:625–39.

23.

Hagan

McCarthy

. Streetlife and delinquency. Br J Sociol 1992;43:533–61.

24.

Lobelo

Dowda

Pfeiffer

Pate

. Electronic media exposure and its association with activity-related outcomes in female adolescents: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. J Phys Act Health 2009;6:137–43.

25.

LaJoie

Ridner

. Health information and health risk behaviors in a sample of college students. J Ky Med Assoc 2009;107:58–63.

26.

Bilardi

Sanci

Fairley

Hocking

Mazza

Henning

. The experience of providing young people attending general practice with an online risk assessment tool to assess their own sexual health risk. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:29.

27.

Boyd

. Why youth “heart” social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham

David

, editor. Youth, identity, and digital media. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press; 2008. p. 119–42.

28.

Gross

Juvonen

Gable

. Internet use and well-being in adolescence. J Soc Issues 2002;58:75–90.

29.

Lange

. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007;13(1):article 18 [cited 2009 Apr 30]. Available from: URL: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/lange.html

30.

Gray

Klein

Noyce

Sesselberg

Cantrill

. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: The place of the Internet. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:1467–78.

31.

Juvonen

Gross

. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health 2008;78:496–505.

32.

Bender

Ferguson

Pollio

Thompson

McClendon

. Technology as an underutilized tool for providing health services and support to street youth. Paper presented at the 2009 Meeting of the American Public Health Association; 2009 Nov 7–11; Philadelphia. Also available from: URL: http://apha.confex.com/apha/137am/webprogram/Paper199105.html [cited 2010 Feb 18].

33.

Wasserman

Faust

. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1994.

34.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). 2007 Youth Risk Behavior Survey [cited 2008 Apr 15], Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/yrbss

35.

Merton

. Social theory and social structure. Glencoe (IL): Free Press; 1957.

36.

Fisher

. Possible effects of reference group-based social influence on AIDS-risk behavior and AIDS prevention. Am Psychol 1988;43:914–20.

37.

Berndt

. Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology 1979;15:608–16.

38.

Sussman

Dent

Mestel-Rauch

Johnson

. Adolescent nonsmokers, triers, and regular smokers' estimates of cigarette smoking prevalence: When do overestimations occur and by whom? J Appl Soc Psychol 1988;18:537–51.

39.

Collins

Sussman

Rauch

Dent

Johnson

Hansen

. Psychosocial predictors of young adolescent cigarette smoking: A sixteen-month, three-wave longitudinal study. J Appl Soc Psychol 1987;17:554–73.

40.

Graham

Marks

Hansen

. Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use. J Appl Psychol 1991;76:291–8.

41.

Marks

Graham

Hansen

. Social projection and social conformity in adolescent alcohol use: A longitudinal analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1992;18:96–101.