The Engagement of Academic Institutions in Community Disaster Response: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Objective.

Using comparative analysis, we examined the factors that influence the engagement of academic institutions in community disaster response.

Methods.

We identified colleges and universities located in counties affected by four Federal Emergency Management Agency-declared disasters (Kentucky ice storms, Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, California wildfires, and the Columbia space shuttle disintegration) and performed key informant interviews with officials from public health, emergency management, and academic institutions in those counties. We used a comparative case study approach to explore particular resources provided by academic institutions, processes for engagement, and reasons for engagement or lack thereof in the community disaster response.

Results.

Academic institutions contribute a broad range of resources to community disaster response. Their involvement and the extent of their engagement is variable and influenced by (1) their resources, (2) preexisting relationships with public health and emergency management organizations, (3) the structure and organizational placement of the school's disaster planning and response office, and (4) perceptions of liability and lines of authority. Facilitators of engagement include (1) the availability of faculty expertise or special training programs, (2) academic staff presence on public health and emergency management planning boards, (3) faculty contracts and student practica, (4) incident command system or emergency operations training of academic staff, and (5) the existence of mutual aid or memoranda of agreements.

Conclusion.

While a range of relationships exist between academic institutions that engage with public health and emergency management agencies in community disaster response, recurrent win-win themes include co-appointed faculty and staff; field experience opportunities for students; and shared planning and training for academic, public health, and emergency management personnel.

References

Boyer

, Creating the new American college. Chronicle of Higher Education 1994 Mar 9 [cited 2014 Jun 27]. Available from: URL: http://chronicle.com/article/Creating-the-New-American/93483.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (US). University-community partnerships in America: Current practices. Vol. III. Washington: HUD; 1999. Also available from: URL: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED440564 [cited 2014 Jun 27].

Department of Homeland Security (US). Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-21 [cited 2013 Dec 1]. Available from: URL: http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/bio/resource/documents/hspd-21.pdf.

Dunlop

Isakov

Compton

White

Nassery

Frank

, Medical outreach following a remote disaster: Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Disaster Med 2007;2:121–32.

Flynn

, America the resilient: Defying terrorism and mitigating natural disasters. Foreign Affairs 2008;87:2–8.

Fulmer

Portelli

Foltin

Zimmerman

Chachkes

Gold-Frank

, Organization-based incident management: Developing a disaster volunteer role on a university campus. Disaster Manag Response 2007;5:74–81.

Gluncić

Pulanić

Prka

Marušić

Curricular and extracurricular activities of medical students during war, Zagreb University School of Medicine, 1991–1995. Acad Med 2001;76:82–7.

Searle

, Baylor College of Medicine's support of Tulane University School of Medicine following Hurricane Katrina. Acad Med 2007;82:733–44.

Dunlop

Logue

Beltran

Isakov

, Role of academic institutions in community disaster response since September 11, 2001. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2011;5:218–26.

10.

Provan

Milward

, Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Admin Rev 2001;61:414–23.

11.

Altevogt

Pope

Hill

Shine

, editors. Research priorities in emergency preparedness and response for public health systems: A letter report. Washington: National Academies Press; 2008.

12.

Brinkerhoff

, The success case method: A strategic evaluation approach to increasing the value and effect of training. Adv Develop Human Resour 2005;7:86–101.

13.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (US). Disaster declarations by year [cited 2012 Oct 12]. Available from: URL: http://www.fema.gov/disasters/grid/year.

14.

Department of Education (US). National Center for Education Statistics [cited 2013 Jan 12]. Available from: URL: http://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator.

15.

Atkinson

Flint

Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Social Research Update 2001;33:1–4.

16.

Dion

Evidence and inference in the comparative case study. In: Goertz

Starr

, editors. Necessary conditions: Theory, methodology, and applications. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers; 2002. p. 95–112.

17.

Guest

MacQueen

Namey

, Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2011.

18.

VERBI Software: MAXQDA. Berlin: VERBI Software; 2013.

19.

Department of Health and Human Services (US). National health security strategy of the United States of America, December 2009 [cited 2013 Sep 10]. Available from: URL: http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/authority/nhss/strategy.

20.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response. Public health preparedness capabilities: National standards for state and local planning, March 2011 [cited 2013 Sep 11]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/phpr/capabilities.

21.

Department of Education (US), Institute of Educational Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Digest of education statistics [cited 2014 Jan 5]. Available from: URL: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/tables/dt13_317.10.asp.