Local Health Department Planning for a Radiological Emergency: An Application of the AHP 2 Tool to Emergency Preparedness Prioritization

Abstract

Objective.

We tested the Analytical Hierarchy Process tool for its use in public health to identify potential gaps in emergency preparedness by local health departments (LHDs) in California and Hawaii during a radiological emergency.

Methods.

We developed a dedicated tool called All-Hazards Preparedness Squared (AHP²) that can be used by those who are responsible for all-hazards preparedness planning and response to guide them while making strategic decisions both in preparing for and responding to a slow-moving incident while it is unfolding. The tool is an Internet-based survey that can be distributed among teams responsible for emergency preparedness and response. Twenty-eight participants from 16 LHDs in California and Hawaii responsible for coordinating preparedness and response in a radiological emergency participated in using the tool in 2013. We used the data to compare the perceived importance of different elements of preparedness among participants and identify gaps in preparedness of their organizations for meeting the challenges presented by a radiological incident.

Results.

Clarity of information and transfer of information (to and from agency to public, state, and federal partners) were public health officials' dominant concerns while responding to an emergency. Participants also found that there were gaps in the adequacy of training and awareness of the chain of command during a radiological emergency.

Conclusion.

This preliminary study indicates that the AHP² tool could be used for decision making in all-hazards preparedness planning and response.

References

Danielsson

Ohlsson

Decision-making in emergency management: A survey study. Int J Cognitive Ergon 1999;3:91–9.

Department of Homeland Security (US). Target capabilities list: A companion to the National Preparedness Guidelines. Washington: DHS; 2007.

Parker

Nelson

Shelton

Dausey

Lewis

Pomeroy

, Measuring crisis decision making for public health emergencies. Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corporation; 2009. Also available from: URL: http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR712 [cited 2012 Feb 12].

Federal Emergency Management System (US). National Incident Management System [cited 2014 Jul 3]. Available from: URL: http://www.fema.gov/national-incident-management-system.

Nivolianitou

Synodinou

Towards emergency management of natural disasters and critical accidents: The Greek experience. J Environ Manag 2011;92:2657–65.

Saaty

, How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Operation Res 1990;48:9–26.

Creative Designs Foundation. Super Decisions software [cited 2014 Jul 20]. Available from: URL: www.superdecisions.com.

Decision Lens. Decision Lens: Version 3. Arlington (VA): Decision Lens; 2012.

Klein

Drury

Pfaff

, Providing an option awareness basis for naturalistic decision making. Int J Cog Technol 2011;16:10–9.

10.

Levinson

, Local public health preparedness for radiological and nuclear incidents. Rockville (MD): Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2012. Report No. OEI-04-10-00250.

11.

Department of Homeland Security (US). Nuclear/radiological incident annex [cited 2014 Jul 3]. Available from: URL: https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf_nuclearradiologicalincidentannex.pdf.

12.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), Radiation Studies Branch. Population monitoring in radiation emergencies: A guide for state and local public health planners. 2nd ed. Atlanta: CDC; 2014.

13.

White House (US). National security strategy. May 2010 [cited 2013 Jun 23]. Available from: URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf.