Competencies Needed in Oral Communication in English among Thai Undergraduate Public Relations Students: A Substantial Gap between Expectations and Reality
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online August, 2011
Competencies Needed in Oral Communication in English among Thai Undergraduate Public Relations Students: A Substantial Gap between Expectations and Reality
This article investigates the competencies needed for oral communication in English among Thai undergraduate public relations students for handling public relations job interviews and performing entry-level public relations work. To identify these competencies, the study identified and involved all of the stakeholders in the data reliability assessment process. The DACUM process, a research-based methodology of developing a curriculum, was modified through interviews with experts in the field to compile and validate the list of the competencies needed. As a result, the validated list consists of four competencies needed for public relations job interviews and eight competencies needed for entry-level public relations work. For triangulation purposes, a questionnaire survey on 222 public relations students and semi-structured interviews with a focus group were conducted to explore the students’ perspectives. The article discusses a huge gap between expectations and the real-world situation and provides suggestions to help bridge this gap.
Braine G. ( 2001) When professors don’t cooperate: a critical perspective on EAP research. English for Specific Purposes20(3): 293-303.
2.
Brunton M. ( 2009) An account of ESP with possible future direction. English for Specific Purposes World8(3). Available at: www.esp-world.info/Articles24/issue24.htm
3.
Chien C., Lee W., and Kao L. ( 2008) Collaborative teaching in an ESP program. Asian EFL Journal10(4). Available at: http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/December08cnc.php
4.
Clennell C. ( 1999) Promoting pragmatic: awareness and spoken discourse skills with EAP classes. ELT Journal53(2): 83-91.
5.
Crosling G., Ward I. ( 2002) Oral communication: the workplace needs and uses business graduate employees. English for Specific Purposes21(1): 41-57.
6.
Dachacheep S. ( 2001) The Expectation of Public Relations Management on Qualification of Public Relations Graduates. Bangkok: Department of Public Relations and Advertising, Kasem Bundit University.
7.
Dayal S. ( 2005) English Language Learning in the ESP Context: an Indian Experiment. Language in India. Available at: http://www.languageinindia.com/aug2005/shebaesp1.html
8.
Dominguez GA, Rokowski PE ( 2002) Bridging the gap between English for academic and occupational purposes. English for Specific Purposes World1(2). Available at: http://www.espworld.info/Articles_2/Bridging%20the%20gap%20between%20English%20for%20Academic%20and%20Occupational%20Purposes.html
9.
Edwards N. ( 2000) Language for business: effective needs assessment, syllabus design and materials preparation in a practical ESP course study. English for Specific Purposes19(3): 291-96.
10.
Flowerdew J., Peacock M. ( 2001) Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Friedland E. ( 2004) Communication across curriculum: what’s a small college to do? The Journal of General Education53(3/4): 288-310.
12.
Garner RC ( 2000) Correlation, causation, motivation and second language learning acquisition. Canadian Psychology41(1): 10-24.
13.
Hewings M. ( 2002) History of ESP through English for specific purposes. English for Specific Purposes World1(3). Available at: http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_3/Hewings_paper.htm
14.
Horn B., Stoller F., and Robinson MS ( 2008) Interdisciplinary collaboration: two heads are better than one. Forum46(2): 2-13.
15.
Jones EA ( 2001)Working in partnership with faculty to transform undergraduate curricula. In: Voorhees RA (ed.) Measuring What Matters: Competency-based Learning Models in Higher Education . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass , 15-28.
16.
Kaur S., Clarke CM ( 2009) Analysing the English language needs of human resource staff in multinational companies. English for Specific Purposes World8(3). Available at: http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_24/Analysing%20EL%20needs%20of%20HR%20staff%20_Sarjit%20&%20Candice_.pdf
17.
Kassim H., Ali F (2010) English communicative events and skills needed at the workplace: feedback from the industry. English for Specific Purposes29: 168-82.
18.
Khamkhien A. ( 2010) Teaching English speaking skills and English speaking tests in the Thai context: a reflection from Thai perspective. English Language Teaching3: 184-90.
19.
Kim E., Johnson TL ( 2010) Sailing through the port: does PR education prepare students for the profession?Institute for Public Relations. Available at: http://www.instituteforpr.org/research_single/sailing_through_the_port_does_pr_education_prepare_students/
20.
Lwin M., Aitchison J. ( 2003) Clueless in Public Relations. Singapore : Pearson Education.
21.
McKinney BC ( 2006) Public relations in Vietnam: a six-year perspective. Public Relations Quarterly. Available at: http://www.allbusiness.com/administrative-support/administrativeservices-employment/4052055-1.html
22.
Maes J., Weldy T., and Icenogle M. ( 1997) A managerial perspective: oral communication competency is most important for business students in the workplace. Journal of Business Communication34: 67-80.
23.
Middlehurst R. ( 2001) University challenges: borderless higher education, today and tomorrow. Minerva39: 3-26.
24.
Mizrahi J. ( 2007) Communicating with the press release: teaching undergraduates the basics. Proceedings of the 2007 Association for Business Communication Annual Convention. Washington DC, 10-12 October 2007. Association for Business Communication.
25.
Munsakorn N. ( 2007) A study of problems and needs of undergraduate students at Bangkok university in learning English for specific purposes. BU Academic Review6(1): 64-74.
26.
Newsom D, Turk JV, and Kruckeberg D (2004) This PR: The Realities of Public Relations. CanadaThomson .
27.
Setawedin N. ( 2005) English for Public Relations. Bangkok : Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosin Borpitpimuk Chakrawad Campus.
28.
Stapp YE ( 1998) Instructor-employer collaboration: a model for technical workplace. English for Specific Purposes17(2): 169-82.
29.
Taillefer GF ( 2007) The professional language needs of economics graduates: assessment and perspectives in the French context. English for Specific Purposes26(2): 135-55.
30.
Thammavipat K. ( 2000) Professionalism of public relations practitioners: roles and job descriptions in Thailand. The Journal of Communication Arts18(2): 1-7.
31.
Tsou W. ( 2009) ESP (English for Specific Purposes) makes college EFL learning effective. Paper accepted for presentation at TESOL 2009 Annual Conference, Denver, CO, 26-28 March 2009.
32.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education (2001) Defining and Assessing Learning: Exploring Competency-based Initiatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
33.
Vasavakul A. ( 2006) A business English oral communication (BEOC) for customer services staff at international banks: translating needs analysis to a course development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
34.
Walqui A. ( 2000) Contextual factors in second language acquisition. ERIC Digest. Available at: www.eric.org. ERIC Document No. 444381.
35.
Wiriyachitra A. ( 2001) A Thai university English scenario in the coming decades . Thai TESOL Newsletter14: 4-7.
36.
Wu H., Badger RG ( 2009) In a strange and unchartered land: ESP teachers’ strategies for dealing with unpredicted problems in subject knowledge during class?English for Specific Purposes28(1): 19-32.
37.
Yamane T. ( 1973) Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. Third Edition. New York: Harper and Row.
