Why Make Them Crawl If They Can Walk? Teaching with Mother Tongue Support

Abstract

The article addresses the long-standing issue over the role of the mother tongue in the foreign language classroom. In the first part it is argued that the mother tongue lays the cognitive foundations for all subsequent language learning. Double comprehension as the basic requirement for learning to take place is explained. The second part is practical. It focuses on two bilingual techniques, idiomatic translations for the clarification of grammatical functions, and mother tongue mirroring which makes grammatical forms transparent and shows their hidden logic. Examples are from various languages, but are especially drawn from Mandarin since non-related languages best illustrate the need for systematic mother tongue support.

Keywords

mother tongue language learning FL children

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Butzkamm

(1989/2002) HYPERLINK ‘http://www.fremdsprachendidaktik.rwth-aachen.de/Ww/4_psycho.html’ Psycholinguistik des Fremdsprachenunterrichts. Natürliche Künstlichkeit: Von der Muttersprache zur Fremdsprache. Tübingen: Francke.

Butzkamm

(2000) Between drill and discourse – the generative principle and the problem of learning transfer. In: International Review of Applied Linguistics 38:147-59.

Butzkamm

(2003) We only learn language once. The role of the mother tongue in FL classrooms: death of a dogma. In: Language Learning Journal 28: 29-39.

Butzkamm

Caldwell

JAW

(2009) The Bilingual Reform. A Paradigm Shift in Foreign Language Teaching. Tübingen: Narr.

Chaudhuri

(2009) Mehrsprachigkeit und Grammatikerwerb. Tübingen: Narr.

Clarke

(2003) First Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook

(1993) Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Macmillan.

Deller

Rinvolucri

(2002) Using the Mother Tongue. Making the Most of the Learner’s Language. London: Baskerville Press Ltd.

Ellis

(1990) Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.

10.

Gopnik

(2001) The Scientist in the Crib. What Early Learning Tells Us About the Mind. New York: Perennial.

11.

Hart

Risley

(1995) Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

12.

Hawkins

(1981) Modern Languages in the Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Krashen

Terrell

(1983) The Natural Approach. Language Acquisition the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

14.

Krashen

(1985) The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London and New York: Longman.

15.

Kuhl

(1991) Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. In: Perception and Psychophysics 50: 93-107.

16.

Sheen

(2005) Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. In: Housen

Pierrard

(eds) Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 271-310.

17.

Swan

(2005) Legislation by hypothesis: the case of task-based instruction. In: Applied Linguistics 26.3: 376-401.

18.

Tomasello

(2003) Constructing a Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Vaezi

Mirzaei

(2007) The effect of using translation from L1 to L2 as a teaching technique on the improvement of EFL learners’ linguistic accuracy – focus on form. In: Humanising Language Teaching (Year 9, Issue 5, September). Available at: http://www.hltmag.co.uk/sep07/mart03.htm

20.

Von Elek

Oskarsson

(1973) Teaching Foreign Language Grammar to Adults. A Comparative Study. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.

21.

Von Humboldt

(1963) Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. In: Flitner

Giel

(eds) Werke in fünf Bänden Vol. 3. Stuttgart: Cotta.

22.

(2010) Open the door to English with your native language: the role of the mother tongue in English language teaching in China. PhD dissertation, University of Aachen, Germany.