Reading-Writing Connections in E.a.P. Classes: a Content Analysis of Written Summaries Produced Under Three Mediating Conditions

Abstract

A recent study by the authors has proposed a rationale for investigating the effects of mediating tasks upon a summary writing activity for tertiary-level students using English as an educational medium. The tasks in the study involved a group discussion or a reading comprehension exercise, with a third condition providing for immediate access to the text and summary instructions with no mediating activity.

Following a brief review of the experimental design and procedures, the authors now present an original comparative analysis of the content of summaries written by students under the three different task conditions (approximately 30 students in each group). The content analysis examines the selection of topics, their sequential development and especially their relative prominence in these summaries. The discussion of implications for teaching assesses the merits of mediating tasks as language activities and also comments on their probable effects upon final written outcomes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson, J.C. & Urquhart, A.H. 1984. Introduction: what is reading? In Alderson, J.C. & Urquhart, A.H. (eds.) Reading in a Foreign Language: xv-xxviii. London: Longman.

Allison, D.M. , Berry, V. and Lewkowicz, J.A. 1994. Pig in the middle? Effects of mediating tasks on cognitive processing of text In: Bird, N., Falvey, P., Tsui, A.B.M., Allison, D.M. & McNeill, A. (eds.) 1994. Language and Learning : 463-490. Hong Kong. Government Printer.

Allison, D.M. , Berry, V. and Lewkowicz, J.A. Forthcoming. Processes and their products: A comparison of task sequences and outcomes in EAP writing classes To appear in Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching #18.

Christie, F. 1988. Learning to write genres In Murray, J. and Smith, F. (ed.), Language arts and the learner: 70-85. South Melbourne: Macmillan.

Gunning, R. 1952. The Technique of Clear Writing New York. McGraw-Hill.

Hymes, D. & Cazden, C. 1980. Narrative thinking and story-telling rights: a folklorist's clue to a critique of education In Hymes, D. (ed.) 1980. Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays : 126-138. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics .

Hynds, S. and Rubin, D.L. (eds.) 1990. Perspectives on Talk and Learning. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Jenson, G.H. and DiTiberio, J.K. 1984. Personality and individual writing processes College Composition and Communication, 35(3): 285-300.

McCrone, J. 1993. Is there a gene for genius? In The Independent on Sunday, London, 2 May.

10.

Martin, J. & Rothery, J. 1986. What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about 'good writing'. In Couture, B. (ed.), Functional Approaches to Writing: 241-265. London: Frances Pinter.

11.

Noru_is, M.J./SPSS Inc. 1992. SPSS for Windows, Release 5.0. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc.

12.

Samraj, B.T.R. 1989. Exploring current issues in genre theory Word 40 (1-2): 189-200.

13.

Taylor, K. 1984. The different summary skills of inexperienced and professional writers Journal of Reading , 27:691-699.