Under-represented minority (URM) faculty can expand the range of perspectives taught to students, but only if they are hired, granted tenure, and promoted. Their career paths can be constrained due to a stratification process that appears to legitimate a non-Hispanic White male set of rules and practices, including value neutrality and objectivity. This article measures specific aspects of human and social capital and their relationship to academic stratification in two social science disciplines, economics and sociology. Here, we measure stratification by the distribution of academic rank and examine differences based on discipline, institution type, race/ethnicity, gender, and publications in terms of academic career success. Our data are unique because they are gathered from multiple secondary sources. One contribution of this article is to measure social capital as a “two worlds” phenomenon, taken from W. E. B. Du Bois. Not surprisingly, we find that “publish or perish” still rules. Conversely, URM-oriented social capital, which can provide a safe space and opportunities to collaborate on scholarly work, is not significant. But, it may be related to feelings of satisfaction and inclusion. The only exceptions are URM-oriented sections in sociology. The article concludes with a series of policy recommendations to support URM faculty members in their careers.
AguirreA.TurnerJ. H. (2004). American ethnicity. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
2.
AlexisM.SpratlenT.WilsonC. Z. (2008). Robert Browne and the Caucus of Black economics. Review of Black Political Economy, 35(2-3), 61-66.
3.
AllenW.SuhS. A.GonzalesG.YangJ. (2008). Quo Bono: Explaining of defending winners and losers in the competition for educational achievement. In ZuberiT.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White logic, White methods (pp. 217-239). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
AutorD. H.KatzL. F.KearneyM. S. (2006). The polarization of the U.S. labor market. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 96, 189-194.
BeckerG. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385-409.
7.
BeckerG. S. (1975). Human capital (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
8.
BellasM.ToutkoushianR. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22, 367-390.
9.
BeutelA. M.NelsonD. (2006). The gender and race-ethnicity of faculty in top social science departments. Social Science Journal, 43, 1111-1125.
10.
BlackwellJ. E. (1992). Minorities and the Liberation of ASA?American Sociologist, 23, 11-17.
11.
BlackwellJ. E.JanowitzM. (Eds.). (1974). Black Sociologists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2017). What we were, what we are, and what we should be: The racial problem of American sociology. Social Problems, 64, 179-187.
13.
Bonilla-SilvaE.EmbrickD. G. (2005). The race problem in the critical pedagogy community. In RossattoC.AllenR. L.PruynM. (Eds.), Re-inventing critical pedagogy (pp. 21-35). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14.
Bonilla-SilvaE.EmbrickD. G. (2008). Fight the power! Racism, revolution, and the role of education in the anti-racism movement. In PollackM. (Ed.), Everyday antiracism (pp. 334-336). New York, NY: New Press.
15.
BostonT. (1997). A different vision. New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
17.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
BowlesS.GintisH. (2011). Schooling in capitalist America. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.
19.
BrewerR. M.ConradC. A.KingM. C. (2002). The complexities and potential of theorizing gender, caste, race, and class. Feminist Economics, 8(2), 3-18.
20.
BrogaardJ.EngelbergJ.Van WesepE. (2018). Do economists swing for the fences after tenure?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 179-194.
21.
BurbridgeL. C. (1997). Black women in the history of African American economic thought. In BostonT. D. (Ed.), A different vision (pp. 101-122). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
BurgessS. (2016). Human capital and education: The state of the art in the economics of education (Discussion Paper No. 9885). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
23.
BurrisV. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige Hierarchies in PhD Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 69, 239-264.
24.
ClarkA.McCallL. (2013). Intersectionality and social explanation in social science research. Du Bois Review, 10, 349-363.
25.
CollinsP. H. (2004). Black sexual politics. Florence, KY: Routledge.
26.
CollinsP. H.BilgeS. (2016). Intersectionality. New York, NY: Wiley.
27.
ConyersJ. E. (1981). The association of Black sociologists: A descriptive account from an insider. American Sociologist, 23, 49-55.
28.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
29.
CSMGEP. (2018). Committee of the status of minority groups in the economics profession. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 722-735.
30.
DarityW. A.Jr. (1982). The human capital approach to Black-White earnings inequality: Some unsettled questions. Journal of Human Resources, 17, 72-93.
31.
DarityW. A.Jr. (2005). Stratification economics: The role of intergroup inequality. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 144-153.
32.
DarityW. A.Jr. (2009). Stratification economics: Context versus culture and the reparations controversy. University of Kansas Law Review, 57, 795-811.
33.
DarityW. A.Jr. (2010). Notes from the Back of the academic bus. In LittleD.MohantyS. P. (Eds.), The future of diversity (pp. 173-180). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
DarityW. A.Jr.MasonP.MyersS. L. (2005). Is there racism in economic research?European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 755-751.
35.
DarityW. A.Jr.MasonP.StewartJ. (2006). The economics of identity: The origin and persistence of racial identity norms. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60, 285-305.
36.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1903). The souls of Black folk. Chicago, IL: A.C. McClurg.
37.
EmbrickD. G. (2017). Discontents within the discipline: Sociological hypnagogia, negligence, and denial. Social Problems, 64, 188-193.
38.
EssienV. (2003). Visible and invisible barriers to the incorporation of faculty of color into White law schools. Journal of Black Studies, 3, 63-71.
39.
FeaginJ. R. (2013). The White racial frame. New York, NY: Routledge.
40.
FewA. L. (2007). Integrating Black consciousness and critical race feminism into family studies research. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 452-473.
41.
GibsonJ.AndersonD. L.TresslerJ. (2014). Which journal rankings best explain academic salaries? Evidence from the University of California. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1322-1340.
42.
GruskyD.SzelenyiS. (2011). The inequality reader. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43.
GutmannM.NicholsL. (2012, November). Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Research at NSF. Presentation given at Consortium of Social Science Associations Annual Colloquium. Washington, DC.
44.
HamiltonD.DarityW. A.Jr. (2017). The political economy of education, financial literacy, and the racial wealth gap. The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 99, 59-76.
45.
HansonS. (2008). Swimming against the tide. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
46.
KingD. (1989). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 142-172.
47.
LeggonC. B. (2006). Women in science, racial and ethnic differences and the differences they make. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 325-333.
48.
MarxK. (1972). Selected writings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
MasseyD. (2008). Categorically unequal. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
50.
MincerJ. (1994). Investment in U.S. education and training (NBER Working Paper No. 4844). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
51.
MincerJ.PolachekS. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 76-108.
52.
MorrisA. (2016). The scholar Denied. Oakland: University of California Press.
53.
MullingsL. (1997). On our own terms. New York, NY: Routledge.
54.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). 2015 doctorate recipients from U.S. universities. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
55.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
PriceG. N. (2009). The problem of the 21st century: Economics faculty and the color line. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 331-343.
57.
PriceG. N.AllenM. (2014). The scholarly status of Blacks in the economics profession: Has the national economics association and the review of black political economy mattered?Review of Black Political Economy, 41, 1-11.
58.
PurwarN. (2004). Fish in and out of water: A theoretical framework for race and the space of academia. In LawI.PhillipsD.TurneyL. (Eds.), Institutional racism in higher education (pp. 49–57). Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.
59.
ReskinB. F.CharlesC. Z. (1999). Now you see ’em, now you don’t: Theoretical approaches to race and gender in labor markets. In BrowneI. (Ed.), Latinas and African American women in the labor market (pp. 380-407). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
RomeroM. (2017). Reflections on “The department is very male, very White, very old, and very conservative”: The functioning of the hidden curriculum in graduate sociology departments. Social Problems, 64, 212-218.
ScottC. E.SigfriedJ. J. (2017). American Economic Association Universal Academic Questionnaire Summary Statistics. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 107, 678–680.
63.
SeguraD. (1989). Chicana and Mexican immigrant women at work: The impact of class, race, and gender on occupational mobility. Gender and Society, 3, 137-152.
64.
SharpeR. V. (2017). We’ve built the pipeline: What’s the problem and what’s next?CSWEP News, American Economic Association, Issue 2, 10-11.
65.
Spalter-RothR.ErskineW. (2007). Race and ethnicity in the sociology pipeline (Research brief). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
66.
ThomasJ. M. (2014). Affect and the sociology of race: A program for critical inquiry. Ethnicities, 14(4), 72-90.
67.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). The Condition of Education, 2017. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
68.
WebberK.González CanchéM. (2016, October). Is there a gendered path to tenure? Examining the academic trajectories of US doctoral recipients. Paper presented at the Southern Association for Institutional Research Conference, Charlotte, NC.
69.
WeberL. (2001). Understanding race class gender and sexuality. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
70.
WeberM. (1946). From Max Weber. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
71.
WhiteheadJ.HarrisC. K. (Eds.). (1999). Reading in Black political economy. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
72.
WilsonL. (1942). The academic man. New York, NY: Octagon Books.
73.
WinantH. (2007). The dark side of the force: One hundred years of the sociology of race. In CalhounC. (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 535-571). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
74.
WrightE.II. (2002). The Atlanta Sociological Laboratory, 1896-1924: A historical account of the first American school of sociology. Western Journal of Black Studies, 26, 165-174.
75.
WrightE. W.II. (2016). The first American school of sociology. New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
WuA. H. (2017). Gender stereotyping in academia: Evidence from economics job market rumors forum (Senior thesis). University of California, Berkeley.
77.
ZambranaR. E.WingfieldA. H.LapeyrouseL. M.DavilaB. A.HoaglandT. L.ValdezR. B. (2017). Blatant, subtle, and insidious: URM faculty perceptions of discriminatory practices in predominantly White institutions. Sociological Inquiry, 87, 207–232.
78.
ZuberiT.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, White methods. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
