Renin-angiotensin system antagonists are associated with lower mortality in hypertensive patients with COVID-19

Abstract

The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of all published studies that reported the outcomes of ACEIs/ARBs in patients with COVID-19. We included four observational studies (3,267 patients). The use of ACEIs/ARBs was associated with a similar risk of all-cause death (OR: 0.75, 95% CI [0.36, 1.57], p = 0.45). Sensitivity analysis including only hypertensive patients demonstrated a lower risk of death with ACEIs/ARBs use (OR: 0.57, 95% CI [0.32-0.98], p = 0.04). In conclusion, hypertensive patients with COVID-19 treated with ACEIs/ARBS have a lower mortality but further research is needed.

Keywords

COVID-19 coronavirus hypertension Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors Angiotensin II receptor blockers

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a massive threat to healthcare worldwide. Hypertension is a common comorbidity in patients infected with COVID-19 with a reported incidence of 15-31% of patients admitted with COVID-19.^1–3 hypertension is commonly treated with the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists [i.e., angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)]. Angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2) is substantially increased by the use of ACEIs and ARBs.⁴ Chronic angiotensin-1 receptor (AT1R) blockade was also shown to cause ACE-2 upregulation.⁵ Coronaviruses, especially COVID-19, bind to their target cells through ACE-2,⁴ which created concern regarding the continuation of these medications in patients with COVID-19 given the possibility of worsening the infection. Major societies including Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), American College of Cardiology (ACC), and American Heart Association (AHA) all recommend continuing RAS antagonists in the absence of data supporting this concern. Data on the outcomes of ACEIs/ARBs in patients with COVID-19 is limited; we, therefore, performed the current meta-analysis to fill that gap in the literature.

The current study was conducted according to the proposal for conducting and reporting meta-analyses of observational studies (Moose).⁶ We performed a computerized search limited to the English language through Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from December 2019 to May 2020 using the following search terms separately and in combination; “COVID-19,” “ACEIs,” “ARBs,” “RAS antagonists,” “angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,” “angiotensin receptor blockers,” and “renin-angiotensin antagonists.” We included published studies that reported outcomes with the use of ACEIs/ARBs in patients admitted with COVID-19 infection (Figure S1). The data were extracted and confirmed by two independent investigators (MM, MG), both physicians. Bias risk of the included studies was assessed using the New-Castle Ottawa Scale for cohort studies (Table S1). Outcomes included all-cause death, the severity of illness, and length of stay (LOS). Definitions of outcomes, inclusion, and exclusion criteria per each study are shown in Table S2. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Review Manager software (Version 5.3.5. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies while continuous variables as means with standard deviations (SD). Categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact or Chi-square tests. Continuous variables were analyzed using the two-sample t-test. A two-tailed p-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented as summary statistics. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I² statistic. We used the Der-Simonian and Laird random-effects and random-effects generic inverse variance methods were used to calculate OR and MD, respectively. Potential publication bias was assessed using Egger's test by visual examination of the funnel plots (Figure S2). A sensitivity analysis was performed for all-cause death, including only patients with hypertension.^3,7,8

We included four observational studies (3,267 patients) (ACEIs/ARBs n = 534, no ACEIs/ARBs = 2,733).^3,7–9 Baseline characteristics of the included studies are shown in Tables 1 and S3.

Table 1.

Summary of the current studies on ACEI/ARB use in COVID.

Study	Li et al. 2020	Zhang et al. 2020	Meng et al. 2020	Mehta et al. 2020
Center	Central Hospital of Wuhan, China	Hubei Province, China	Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, China	Cleveland Health System, USA
Enrollment period	January 15th, 2020 to March 15th, 2020	December 31st, 2019 to February 20th, 2020 Patients with hypertension who are COVID-19 positive	January 11th, 2020 to February 23rd, 2020 Patients with hypertension who are COVID-19 positive	March 8th, 2020 to April 12th, 2020 All patients who are tested for COVID-19
Type of study	Retrospective single-center study	Retrospective multicenter study	Retrospective single-center study	Retrospective multicenter study
Total number of COVID-19 positive Patients	362	1,128	42	1,735
Number of patients (ACEIs/ARBs/No ACEIs or ARBs)	115/247	188/940	17/25	214/1,521
Percentage of and ACEIs/ARBs use	ACEIs 30% ARBs 70%	ACEIs 16.5% ARBs 83.5%	ACEIs 11.8% ARBs 88.2%	ACEIs 54.2% ARBS 45.8%
Percentage of severe illness	49.6% on ACEIs/ARBs 47% not on ACEIs/ARBs	NA	23.5% on ACEIs/ARBs 48% not on ACEIs/ARBs	NA
Overall risk of death	21.3% Overall ** In hospital mortality	8.8% ** 28-day mortality	2.4 % ** In-hospital mortality	3.8% ** All cause mortality

Highlights reporting differences in mortality.

ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin-receptor blocker; COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019.

The use of ACEIs/ARBs was associated with a similar risk of all-cause death (OR: 0.75, 95% CI [0.36, 1.57], p = 0.45 I² = 62%), severity of illness (OR: 0.73, 95% CI [0.24, 2.24], p = 0.58, I² = 63%), and similar length of stay (LOS) (MD 1.7 days, 95% CI [−0.7, 4.0], p = 0.16, I²=92%).

Three studies included only patients with hypertension (n = 1,532 patients).^3,7,8 The fourth study included all patients on ACEIs/ARBS regardless of hypertension diagnosis. Sensitivity analysis, including only these studies demonstrated a lower risk of death with ACEIs/ARBs use (OR: 0.57, 95% CI [0.32–0.98], p = 0.04, I² = 19%).

A summary of the study results is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Summary of the study results.

Discussion

The current meta-analysis is the first to report the outcomes of ACEIs/ARBs in patients with COVID-19. In patients with hypertension, the use of ACEIs/ARBs appears to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death. Their use, however, did not affect the severity of illness or LOS in the limited studies that reported them.

Despite the theoretical risk of worsening COVID-19 with the use of ACEIs/ARBs, our analysis demonstrates that they may reduce the risk of death in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. The binding of the coronavirus spike protein to ACE-2 leads to its downregulation and subsequent excessive production of angiotensin and AT1R, contributing to lung injury.^10,11 Although ACE-2 acts as the binding site of the COVID-19, it also inactivates angiotensin II, serves as a negative regulator of RAS and inflammation, and promotes vasodilation.¹⁰ The use of ARBs, therefore, would block AT1R activation and negate the primary mechanism of COVID-19 mediated lung cytokine storm.¹² In hypertensive patients, ARBs/ACEIs decreased the peak viral load, which is correlated with severe lung injury compared with other antihypertensive drugs.⁷

Despite the limitation of pooling observational studies with selection bias and heterogeneity in our analysis, the use of ACEIs/ARBs may be associated with a mortality benefit in hypertensive patients with COVID-19. While thought to be paradoxical, ACEIs/ARBs should be continued in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. In a multivariate analysis, Mehra et al. demonstrated that the ACEIs' use was associated with lower mortality, but ARBs’ use was not. This finding needs further investigation, given the observational nature of the study.¹³ Randomized trials are ongoing to investigate the role of losartan in the management of COVID-19 patients.^14,15

The use of ACEIs/ARBs is associated with a lower risk of death in hypertensive patients with COVID-19. Our study is in agreement with the HFSA/ACC/AHA in that hypertensive patients with COVID-19 should not stop using ACEIs/ARBs. Further research is needed to clarify the mortality benefit in these patients

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-scm-10.1177_0036933020949219 - Supplemental material for Renin-angiotensin system antagonists are associated with lower mortality in hypertensive patients with COVID-19

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-scm-10.1177_0036933020949219 for Renin-angiotensin system antagonists are associated with lower mortality in hypertensive patients with COVID-19 by Michael Megaly and Mattew Glogoza in Scottish Medical Journal

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD

Michael Megaly

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Zhou

, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1054–1062.

Guan

W-J

Z-Y

, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1708–1720.

Wang

Chen

, et al. Association of Renin-Angiotensin system inhibitors with severity or risk of death in patients with hypertension hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in Wuhan, China. JAMA Cardiol 2020; 5: 825.

Wan

Shang

Graham

, et al. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol 2020; 94: e00127-20.

Furuhashi

Moniwa

Mita

, et al. Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in hypertensive patients may be increased by olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Am J Hypertens 2015; 28: 15–21.

Stroup

Berlin

Morton

, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008–2012.

Meng

Xiao

Zhang

, et al. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9: 757–760.

Zhang

Zhu

Cai

, et al. Association of inpatient use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with mortality among patients with hypertension hospitalized with COVID-19. Circ Res 2020; 126

Mehta

Kalra

Nowacki

, et al. Association of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with testing positive for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol 2020. Epub ahead of print 5 May 2020. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1855

10.

Imai

Kuba

Rao

, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 protects from severe acute lung failure. Nature 2005; 436: 112–116.

11.

Kuba

Imai

Rao

, et al. A crucial role of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury. Nat Med 2005; 11: 875–879.

12.

Mehta

McAuley

Brown

, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet 2020; 395: 1033–1034.

13.

Mehra

Desai

Kuy

, et al. Cardiovascular disease, drug therapy, and mortality in covid-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2582–2582.

14.

Losartan for Patients With COVID-19 Not Requiring Hospitalization, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04311177 (2020, accessed 29 July 2020)

15.

Losartan for Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04312009 (2020, accessed 29 July 2020)

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.60 MB