Methodological approach towards sustainability by integration of environmental impact in production system models through life cycle analysis: Application to the Rioja wine sector
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2014
Methodological approach towards sustainability by integration of environmental impact in production system models through life cycle analysis: Application to the Rioja wine sector
This paper proposes the integration of life cycle analysis within the production system models as a tool for decision making (whether at the strategic, tactical or operational levels) attending not only economic and technical criteria but also the environmental impact. This methodological proposal advances over the traditional approach of calculating the value of the environmental impact of a particular product, by proposing the use of models to determine the environmental impact of the product, according to the decisions made in the production system. That is, it does not provide an impact value of the product, but rather a model to determine the impact in terms of the decisions made in the production process; therefore, it can be used, especially by means of simulation, for the optimization of the production system, based on multiple criteria (including environmental impact).
The methodological approach is exemplified by a case study, which is used to validate the proposal and to expose it more precisely and clearly, although the methodology is equally applicable to any production process, especially processes highly automated or with different alternative production techniques.
This case study, based on the wine production sector of the Rioja Qualified Designation of Origin, in Spain, was made with actual data after several years of research in representative wineries; therefore, besides an application example, it is a support tool for sustainability in wineries, by reducing the environmental impact of wine production (especially in La Rioja and Spain, but generally throughout the world).
FullanaPGazullaCClavijoMJ. Análisis del ciclo de vida del vino crianza D.O.C. Rioja/(translated as Life cycle analysis of DOC Rioja wine). Dirección General de Calidad Ambiental, Consejería de Turismo, Medio Ambiente y Política Territorial del Gobierno de La Rioja, 2005.
2.
JohnstoneNHaščičIPoirierJ. Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts. Appl Econ2012; 44: 2157–2170.
3.
WainerG. Applying cell-DEVS methodology for modeling the environment. Simulation2006; 82: 635–660.
4.
ValkeringPRotmansJKrywkowJ. Simulating stakeholder support in a policy process: an application to river management. Simulation2005; 81: 701–718.
5.
SchweimerGW. Life cycle inventory for the Golf A4. Research, Environment and Transport, Volkswagen AG, Wolfsburg, 2000.
6.
SerieuxJEMunthaliSSepehriA. The impact of the global economic crisis on HIV and AIDS programs in a high prevalence country: the case of Malawi. World Dev2012; 40: 501–515.
7.
FrischknechtRJungbluthN. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Final report, Ecoinvent Report, no. 3. Dübendorf, 2003.
8.
BrentrupFKustersJKuhlmannH. Application of the life cycle assessment methodology to agricultural production: an example of sugar beet production with different forms of nitrogen fertilizers. Eur J Agron2001; 14: 221–233.
9.
BehzadianMKazemadehRBAlbadviA. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res2010; 200: 198–215.
10.
SonnemannGW. Environmental damage estimations in industrial process chains. Methodology development with a case study on waste incineration and special focus on human health. PhD Thesis, Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Rovira Virgili, Tarragona, 2002.
11.
De SotoJH. Economic recessions, banking reform and the future of capitalism. Econ Aff2011; 31: 76–84.
12.
IhobeSA. Análisis de ciclo de vida y Huella de carbono: Dos maneras de medir el impacto ambiental de un producto. Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental, 2009.
13.
SchmidtJH. Life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Part 3: life cycle inventory of rapeseed oil and palm oil. PhD Thesis, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, 2007.
14.
NotarnicolaB. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of wine production. In: MattsonBSonessonU (eds) Environmentally-friendly food processing. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2003, pp.306–326.
15.
BransJPVinckePH. A preference ranking organization method - (the Promethee method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag Sci1985; 31: 647–656.
16.
HillDRCKomatsuT. Introduction to the special issue: ecological and environmental simulation. Simulation2006; 82: 425–426.
17.
GorobetsA. The global systemic crisis and a new vision of sustainable human development. Environ Dev Sustain2011; 13: 759–771.
18.
PottsT. The natural advantage of regions: linking sustainability, innovation, and regional development in Australia. J Cleaner Prod2010; 18: 713–725.
19.
FassóACamelettiM. A unified statistical approach for simulation, modeling, analysis and mapping of environmental data. Simulation2010; 86: 139–154.
20.
LongoF. Advances of modeling and simulation in supply chain and industry. Simulation2011; 87: 651–656.
21.
JiménezETejedaASPérezM. Applicability of lean production with VSM to the Rioja wine sector. Int J Prod Res2011; 50: 1890–1904.
22.
Milà i CanalsL. Sources of site- dependency and importance of energy consumption in agricultural LCA: apple production in New Zealand. In: Life cycle assessment in the agri-foods sector, DIAS report: proceedings from the 4th international conference, 6–8 October 2003, Bygholm, Denmark.
23.
HauschildM. Estimating pesticide emissions for LCA of agricultural products. Agricultural data for life cycle assessments. Vol. 1. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), 2000.
24.
ChiriacSE. Economic and environmental interdependencies at a global level: how does the financial crisis influence the environmental crisis. Qual Access Success2011; 12 (suppl.1): 416–421.
25.
GuinéeJBHeijungsRHuppesG. Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. Environ Sci Technol2011; 45: 90–96.
26.
MartínezEJiménezEBlancoJ. LCA sensitivity analysis of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Appl Energy2010; 87: 2293–2303.
27.
MartínezESanzFJiménezE. Life cycle assessment of a multi-megawatt wind turbine. Renewable Energy2009; 34: 667–673.
28.
MartínezESanzFJiménezE. Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method. Int J Life Cycle Assess2009; 14: 52–63.
29.
Sanchez-RamirezCGastón Cedillo-CamposMPerez-VillanuevaP. Global economic crisis and Mexican automotive suppliers: impacts on the labor capital. Simulation2011; 87: 711–725.
30.
GuinéeJB. An operational guide to the ISO standards. Final report, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM) and the Centre for Environmental Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands, 2001.
31.
NarcisoMPieraMAGuaschA. A methodology for solving logistic optimization problems through simulation. Simulation2010; 86: 369–389.
32.
PointE. Life cycle environmental impacts of wine production and consumption in Nova Scotia, Canada. Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University Halifax, 2008.
33.
BrentrupFKustersJLammelJ. Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess2000; 5: 349–357.
34.
UNEP. Life cycle impact assessment definition study: background document III. Analysis of midpoint categories. Paris: United Nations Environmental Programme, Life Cycle Initiative, 2003.
35.
AmannMBertokIBorken-KleefeldJ. Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications. Environ Modell Softw2011; 26: 1489–1501.
36.
PowersS. Nutrient loads to surface water from row crop production. Int J Life Cycle Assess2007; 12: 399–407.
37.
BruzzoneAGLongoF. An advanced system for supporting the decision process within large-scale retail stores. Simulation2010; 86: 742–762.
38.
SchneiderFKallisGMartinez-AlierJ. Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. J Cleaner Prod2010; 18: 511–518.
39.
ArandaA. El Análisis del Ciclo de Vida como herramienta de gestión medioambiental/translated as Life cycle assessment as a tool for environmental management. Madrid: FC Editorial, 2006.
40.
JiménezEPérezM. Simulation and optimization of logistic and production systems using discrete and continuous PN. Simulation2004; 80: 131–142.
41.
ISO2006. ISO 14040 Environmental management. Life cycle assessment. Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland.
42.
GazullaCRaugeiMFullana-I-PalmerP. Taking a life cycle look at crianza wine production in Spain: where are the bottlenecks?Int J Life Cycle Assess2010; 15: 330–337.
43.
ErismanJ. Key factors necessary to determine the impact on the nitrogen cycle and the resulting environmental effects as part of LCA for agricultural products. Agricultural data for life cycle assessments. Vol. 1. The Hague: Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI), 2000.
