Model for studying commodity bundling with a focus on consumer preference: Evidence from the Korean telecommunications market

Abstract

This research complements the demand-side analysis of previous commodity bundling studies. Most previous have researchers analyzed the effects of commodity bundling by focusing on firm behavior and have assumed a simple consumer utility that does not reflect the heterogeneity of consumer preference. However, to measure the results of competition with the bundling strategy, an analysis of commodity bundling based on consumer preference is useful. Unlike previous studies, this study proposes a model that directly analyzes consumer behavior for commodity bundling and incorporates consumer heterogeneity to measure the consumer utility derived from bundled commodities. To validate the model, we used data on service subscriptions and usage of information communication technology in Korea, including fixed phone service, mobile service, and Internet. The empirical results show that the proposed model is useful in analyzing the effects of bundling for various services and products.

Keywords

Bayesian estimation commodity bundling consumer heterogeneity mixed multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

International Salt Co., Inc. v. United States, 332 US 392, 1947.

Jefferson Parish Hospital District v. Hyde, 466 US 2, 1984.

Northern Pacific Railway Company v. United States, 356 US 1, 1958.

Kobayashi

. Does economics provide a reliable guide to regulating commodity bundling by firms? A survey of the economic literature. J Competition Law Econ 2005; 1: 707–746.

Posner

. Antitrust law, an economic perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.

Posner

. Antitrust in the new economy. Antitrust Law J 2001; 68: 925–943.

Whinston

. Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion. Am Econ Rev 1990; 80: 837–859.

Adams

Yellen

. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quarterly J Econ 1976; 90: 475–498.

McAfee

McMillan

Whinston

. Multiproduct monopoly, commodity bundling, and correlation of values. Quarterly J Econ 1989; 104: 371–383.

10.

Fisher

. Games economists play: a noncooperative view. RAND J Econ 1989; 20: 113–124.

11.

Shapiro

. The theory of business strategy. RAND J Econ 1989; 20: 125–137.

12.

Carlton

Waldman

. The strategic use of tying to preserve and create market power in evolving industries. RAND J Econ 2002; 33: 194–220.

13.

Chu

Phillop

Alan

. Bundle-size pricing as an approximation to mixed bundling. Am Econ Rev 2011; 101: 263–303.

14.

Crawford

. The discriminatory incentive to bundle in the cable television industry. Quant Market Econ 2008; 6: 41–78.

15.

Danaher

Huang

Smith

. An empirical analysis of digital music bundling strategies. Manage Sci 2014; 60: 1413–1433.

16.

Harlam

Krishna

Lehmann

. Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. J Bus Res 1995; 33: 57–66.

17.

Hiller

. Profitably bundling information goods: evidence from the evolving video library of Netflix. Soc Sci Res Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2638101 (2015, accessed 5 December 2015).

18.

Schilke

Wirtz

. Consumer acceptance of service bundles: an empirical investigation in the context of broadband triple play. Inform Manage 2012; 49: 81–88.

19.

Shi

Chavas

J-P

Stiegert

. An analysis of bundle pricing: the case of biotech seeds. Agricultural Econ 2012; 43: 125–139.

20.

Bhat

. A multiple discrete-continuous extreme value model: formulation and application to discretionary time-use decisions. Trans Res Part B 2005; 39: 679–707.

21.

Bhat

. The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions. Trans Res Part B 2008; 42: 274–303.

22.

Kim

Allenby

Rossi

. Modeling consumer demand for variety. Market Sci 2002; 21: 229–250.

23.

Ahn

Jeong

Kim

. A forecast of household ownership and use of alternative fuel vehicles: a multiple discrete-continuous choice approach. Energy Econ 2008; 30: 2091–2104.

24.

Calfee

Winston

Stempski

. Econometric issues in estimating consumer preferences from stated preference data: a case study of the value of automobile travel time. Rev Econ Stat 2001; 83: 699–707.

25.

Allenby

Rossi

. Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity. J Econometrics 1998; 89: 57–78.

26.

Edwards

Allenby

. Multivariate analysis of multiple response data. J Market Res 2003; 40: 321–334.

27.

Huber

Train

. On the similarity of classical and Bayesian estimates of individual mean partworths. Market Lett 2001; 12: 259–269.

28.

Train

. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

29.

Liu

Chintagunta

Zhu

. Complimentarities and the demand for home broadband Internet services. Market Sci 2010; 29: 1–20.

30.

Government of Korea. 2005. Information and communication white paper. http://theme.archives.go.kr/next/policy/sub/search_list.do?id_sch=0001910150&mode=view (accessed 5 December 2015).

31.

Train

Sonnier

. Mixed logit with bounded distribution of partworths, working paper. University of California, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 2003.

32.

Al-Akaidi

. Mobile and wireless communications and information processing. Simulation 2000; 75: 4–5.

33.

Armstrong

. A more general theory of commodity bundling. J Econ Theory 2013; 148: 448–472.

34.

Long

. Comments on Gaussian demand and commodity bundling. J Bus 1984; 57: 235–246.

35.

Yan

Bandyopadhyay

. The profit benefits of bundle pricing of complementary product. J Retailing Consumer Services 2011; 18: 355–361.

36.

Drucker

. The practice of management. New York: Harper and Row, 1954.

37.

Hayek

. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

38.

Brief

Bazerman

. Editor’s comments: bringing in consumers. Acad Manage Rev 2003; 28: 187–189.

39.

Johnson

Herrmann

Bauer

. The effects of price bundling on consumer evaluation of product offerings. Int J Res Market 1999; 16: 129–142.

40.

Lee

H-C

Tsai

M-D

. The dilemma of mixed bundled: the effects of price, brand, and content preference on music CD bundle choices. J Retailing Consumer Services 2011. 18: 455–462.

41.

Klein

Jakopin

. Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for mobile telecommunication service bundles. Telematics and Informatics 2014; 31: 410–421.

42.

Byeon

Kim

Kang

. Theoretical research for bundling products on ICT services [in Korean]. Korea Information Society Development Institute, 2006.

43.

Tallberg

Hämmäinena

Töylib

. Impacts of handset bundling on mobile data usage: the case of Finland. Telecommunications Policy 2007; 31: 648–659.

44.

Choi

. Sales of bundling products and prospect. Korea Telecommunications Operators Assoc 2007; 40: 31–36.