Simulation for whole-body vibration to assess ride comfort of a low

Abstract

Vibration in trains constitutes one aspect of the physical environment that can cause discomfort to passengers. In order to assess the vibration, a variety of techniques have been developed and used. The general approach is to acquire acceleration at the passenger–train interface, and to then process these acceleration signals in order to calculate human comfort. However, the comfort index so calculated is independent of the seat characteristics and human parameters. Thus, a human biodynamic model with dynamic seat characteristics is necessary in order to perform true comfort analysis. The biodynamics of human subjects has been a topic of interest over the years, and a number of mathematical models have been established. However, there are only a few studies incorporating biodynamic models in railway applications. So, the present work proposes to evaluate Sperling’s Ride Index for a low–medium speed railway vehicle and further to calculate root mean square acceleration of different body parts, as per the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 2631 guidelines, through bond graph technique. Car body flexibility is also incorporated using modal expansion of a free–free beam. Physiological effects of the vibrations on the human body were analyzed using the criteria specified in ISO 2631.

Keywords

Railway vehicle simulation ride comfort ride quality human biodynamic model whole-body vibration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kang

Choi

Choe

. Whole-body vibration analysis for assessment of railway vehicle ride quality. J Mech Sci Technol 2011; 25: 577–587.

Kant

PVK

. Evaluation of ride and activity comfort for the passengers while travelling by rail vehicles. MTech Thesis, IIT Roorkee, India, 2007.

Suzuki

. Research trends on riding comfort evaluation in Japan. Proc Inst Mech Eng F 1998; 212: 61–72.

Elmaraghy

. Ride quality and dynamics of rail vehicle models for microcomputers. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1987; 16: 193–211.

Kumar

Sujata

. Vertical dynamic analysis of a typical indian rail road vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on computational mechanics and simulation, IIT Guwahati, India, 8–10 December 2006, pp.467–474. India: I K International Publishing House.

Lyon

. Dynamic measurements in the research and development of rail vehicles. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1987; 16: 149–165.

Gangadharan

Sujatha

Ramamurti

. Experimental and analytical ride comfort evaluation of a railway coach. In: A conference & exposition on structural dynamics (SEM ORG IMAC XXII), Dearborn, Michigan, 26–29 January 2004, pp.1–15. Society for Expermental Mechanics.

Kumar

Rastogi

. Investigation of vertical dynamic behaviour and modelling of a typical indian rail road vehicle through bond graph. World J Model Simulat 2009; 5: 130–138.

Zeng

Dai

. The dynamic simulation of vehicle-bridge interactions using bond graph technique. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1994; 23: 591–602.

10.

Karnopp

. Bond graph for vehicle dynamics. Vehicle Syst Dyn 1976; 5: 171–184.

11.

Saha

Karmakar

Bhattacharyya

. Lateral dynamics of a railway truck on flexible tangent track. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on vibration problems, Bengaal Engineering and Science University, West Bengal, India, 1–3 February 2007, pp.339–345. Springer.

12.

Banerjee

Saha

Karmakar

. Bond graph modelling of a railway truck on curved track. Simulat Model Pract Theor 2009; 17: 22–34.

13.

Banerjee

Karmakar

. Bond graph modeling of rail wheelset on curved track. Simulation 2007; 83: 695–706.

14.

Kumar

Rastogi

Pathak

. Computational analysis of railway vehicle on irregular tracks. In: Proceedings of the international conference on bond graph modeling and simulation, Monterey, California, 6–10 July 2014, pp.34–40. Society for Modeling and Simulation International.

15.

Margolis

Shim

. A bond graph model incorporating sensors, actuators, and vehicle dynamics for developing controllers for vehicle safety. J Franklin Inst 2001; 338: 21–34.

16.

Mukherjee

. User manual of SYMBOLS SONATA, High Tech Consultants, STEP, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 2009.

17.

Boileau

Rakheja

. A body mass dependent mechanical impedance model for applications in vibration seat testing. J Sound Vib 2002; 253: 243–264.

18.

Wan

Schimmels

. A simple model that captures the essential dynamics of a seated human exposed to whole body vibration. Adv Bioeng 1995; 31: 333–334.

19.

Liang

Chiang

. A study on biodynamic models of seated human subjects exposed to vertical vibration. Int J Ind Ergon 2006; 36: 869–890.

20.

Kim

Yoon

. Development of a bio- mechanical model of the human body in a sitting posture with vibration transmissibility in the vertical direction. Int J Ind Ergon 2005; 35: 817–829.

21.

Merzouki

Samantaray

Pathak

. Intelligent mechatronic systems: modeling, control and diagnosis. London: Springer, 2013.

22.

Dukkipati

Amyot

. Computer aided simulation in railway dynamics. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1987, pp.69–71.

23.

Forstberg

. Ride comfort and motion sickness in tilting trains - human responses to motion environments in train and simulator experiments. PhD Thesis, Department of Vehicle Engineering, Royal Institute of Engineering, Stockholm, 2000.

24.

ORE reports C116/RP 1−9 /EC 1971−1978. Interaction between vehicle and track. ORE, Utrecht, 1978.

25.

ISO 2631:1985. Evaluation of human exposure to whole body vibration.

26.

Griffin

. Handbook of human vibration. London: Academic Press, 1990.

Simulation for whole-body vibration to assess ride comfort of a low–medium speed railway vehicle

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References