The efficient utilization and management of a scarce resource such as the intensive care unit (ICU) is critical to the smooth functioning of a hospital. This study investigates the impact of a set of operational policies on ICU behavior and performance. Specifically, the implemented policies are (a) wait time thresholds on how long patients can wait for an ICU bed, (b) the time windows during which patient discharges and transfers take place, and (c) different patient mix combinations. The average waiting time of patients for ICU beds and the admission ratio, the ratio of admitted patients to total ICU bed requests, are the performance measures under consideration. Using discrete event simulation, followed by analysis of variance and post hoc tests (Tukey multiple comparison), it is shown that increasing discharge windows has a statistically significant impact on the total number of admissions and average patient wait times. Moreover, average waiting time increased when wait time thresholds increased, especially when the number of emergency surgeries in the mix increased. In addition, larger proportions of elective surgery patients in the patient mix population can lead to significantly reduced ICU performance.
CohenERFeinglassJBarsukJH, et al. Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simul Healthc J Soc Simul Healthc2010; 5: 98–102.
2.
HalpernNABettesLGreensteinR.Federal and nationwide intensive care units and healthcare costs: 1986–1992. Crit Care Med1994; 22: 2001–2007.
3.
AngusDC.Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population. JAMA2000; 284: 2762–2770.
4.
Marlene GyldmarkCP. A review of cost studies of intensive care units. Crit Care Med1995; 23: 964–972.
5.
BaiJFügenerASchoenfelderJ, et al. Operations research in intensive care unit management: a literature review. Health Care Manag Sci2018; 21: 1–24.
6.
BatesDWKupermanGJWangS, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Informatics Assoc2003; 10: 523–530.
7.
HaynesRB.Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Evid Based Med2002; 7: 36–38.
8.
WhartonF.On the risk of premature transfer from coronary care units. Omega1996; 24: 413–423.
9.
ChanCWFariasVFBambosN, et al. Optimizing intensive care unit discharge decisions with patient readmissions. Oper Res2012; 60: 1323–1341.
10.
LiJDongMZhaoW.Admissions optimisation and premature discharge decisions in intensive care units. Int J Prod Res2015; 53: 7329–7342.
11.
GriffithsJDPrice-LloydNSmithiesM, et al. Modelling the requirement for supplementary nurses in an intensive care unit. J Oper Res Soc2005; 56: 126–133.
12.
DobsonGLeeHHPinkerE.A model of ICU bumping. Oper Res2010; 58: 1564–1576.
13.
McManusMLLongMCCooperA, et al. Queuing theory accurately models the need for critical care resources. Anesthesiology2004; 100: 1271–1276.
14.
CostaAXRidleySAShahaniAK, et al. Mathematical modelling and simulation for planning critical care capacity. Anaesthesia2003; 58: 320–327.
15.
AkkermanRKnipM.Reallocation of beds to reduce waiting time for cardiac surgery. Health Care Manag Sci2004; 7: 119–126.
16.
van DijkNMKortbeekN. Erlang loss bounds for OT-ICU systems. Queueing Syst2009; 63: 253–280.
17.
VarneyJBeanNMackay. The self-regulating nature of occupancy in ICUs: stochastic homoeostasis. Health Care Management Science2019; 22(4): 615–634.
18.
TerwieschCKCDKahnJM. Working with capacity limitations: operations management in critical care. Crit Care2011; 15: 308.
19.
HashimotoFBellSMarshmentS. A computer simulation program to facilitate budgeting and staffing decisions in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med1987; 15: 256–259.
20.
BrownKLPagelCPienaarA, et al. The relationship between workload and medical staffing levels in a paediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med2011; 37: 326–333.
21.
SolbergLIAsplinBRWeinickRM, et al. Emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med2003; 42: 824–834.
22.
KimSHChanCWOlivaresM, et al. ICU admission control: an empirical study of capacity allocation and its implication for patient outcomes. Manage Sci2015; 61: 19–38.
23.
RodriguesFZaricGSStanfordDA. Discrete event simulation model for planning Level 2 “step-down” bed needs using NEMS. Oper Res Heal Care2018; 17: 42–54.
24.
AhaltVArgonNTZiyaS, et al. Comparison of emergency department crowding scores: a discrete-event simulation approach. Health Care Manag Sci2018; 21: 144–155.
25.
PeteringMEHAydasOTKuzuK, et al. Simulation analysis of hospital intensive care unit reimbursement policies from the triple bottom line perspective. J Simul2015; 9: 86–98.
26.
MathewsKSLongEF. A conceptual framework for improving critical care patient flow and bed use. Ann Am Thorac Soc2015; 12: 886–894.
27.
HarperPR. A framework for operational modelling of hospital resources. Health Care Manag Sci2002; 5: 165–173.
28.
CochranJKBhartiA. A multi-stage stochastic methodology for whole hospital bed planning under peak loading. Int J Ind Syst Eng2006; 1: 8.
29.
GuptaDNatarajanMKGafniA, et al. Capacity planning for cardiac catheterization: a case study. Health Policy (New York)2007; 82: 1–11.
30.
ProdelMAugustoVXieX. Hospitalization admission control of emergency patients using Markovian decision processes and discrete event simulation. In: proceedings of the 2014 winter simulation conference (eds AndreasTLeventYSaikouYDIlyaOR), Savanah, GA, USA, 7–10 December 2014, paper no. 14871461, pp.1433–1444. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
31.
GunalMMPiddM.Interconnected DES models of emergency, outpatient, and inpatient departments of a hospital. In: proceedings of the 2007 winter simulation conference (eds HendersonSGBillerBHsiehM-H, et al.), Washington, DC, USA, 9–12 December 2007, paper no. 9847884, pp.1461–1466. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
32.
YangKKLamSSWLowJMW, et al. Managing emergency department crowding through improved triaging and resource allocation. Oper Res Heal Care2016; 10: 13–22.
33.
HarperPRShahaniAK. Modelling for the planning and management of bed capacities in hospitals. J Oper Res Soc2002; 53: 11–18.
34.
RidgeJCJonesSKNielsenMS, et al. Capacity planning for intensive care units. Eur J Oper Res1998; 105: 346–355.
35.
SchmitzHHKwakNK. Monte Carlo simulation of operating-room and recovery-room usage. Oper Res1972; 20: 1171–1180.
36.
KolkerA. Process modeling of ICU patient flow: effect of daily load leveling of elective surgeries on ICU diversion. J Med Syst2009; 33: 27–40.
37.
KimS-CHorowitzIYoungKK, et al. Analysis of capacity management of the intensive care unit in a hospital. Eur J Oper Res1999; 115: 36–46.
38.
KimS-CHorowitzIYoungKK, et al. Flexible bed allocation and performance in the intensive care unit. J Oper Manag2000; 18: 427–443.
39.
GuptaDDentonB. Appointment scheduling in health care: Challenges and opportunities. IIE Trans (Inst Ind Eng)2008; 40: 800–819.
40.
BahalkehE. Efficient algorithms for calculating the system matrix and the Kleene Star Operator for systems defined by directed acyclic graphs over dioids. Ohio University, http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1440116216 (2015, accessed 22 June 2017).
41.
MadrakiGBahalkehEJuddR. Efficient algorithm to find makespan under perturbation in operation times. In: IIE annual conference and expo (eds. ÇetinkayaSRyanJK), Nashville, TN, USA, 30 May - 2 June 2015, pp.1474–1481. Norcross, Georgia: Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
42.
BahalkehEMadrakiGJuddR. Efficient system matrix calculation for manufacturing systems. In: IIE annual conference and Expo (eds. ÇetinkayaSRyanJK), Nashville, TN, USA, 30 May – 2 June 2015, pp.1943–1950. Norcross, Georgia: Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).
43.
FurnhamAPetridesKVCallahanI. Prioritizing patients for surgery: factors affecting allocation of medical resources for kidney transplantation, IVF, and rhinoplasty. J Appl Soc Psychol2011; 41: 588–608.
44.
HarrisonGWEscobarGJ. Length of stay and imminent discharge probability distributions from multistage models: variation by diagnosis, severity of illness, and hospital. Health Care Manag Sci2010; 13: 268–279.
45.
AsplinBRMagidDJRhodesKV, et al. A conceptual model of emergency department crowding. Ann Emerg Med2003; 42: 173–180.
46.
RohrerMW. AutoMod tutorial [simulation package]. In: 2000 winter simulation conference proceedings (eds. JoinesJABartonRRKangKFishwickPA), Cat. No.00CH37165, Orlando, FL, USA, USA, 10–13 December 2000, paper no. 6839411, pp.170–176. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
47.
HalseyLGCurran-EverettDVowlerSL, et al. The fickle P value generates irreproducible results. Nat Meth2015; 12: 179–185.
48.
LongEFMathewsKS. The boarding patient: effects of ICU and hospital occupancy surges on patient flow. Prod Oper Manag2018; 27: 2122–2143.
49.
VollamSDuttonSLambS, et al. Out-of-hours discharge from intensive care, in-hospital mortality and intensive care readmission rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med2018; 44: 1115–1129.
50.
NatesJLNunnallyMKleinpellR, et al. ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med2016; 44: 1553–1602.
51.
Van SluisveldNOerlemansAWestertG, et al. Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res2017; 17: 251.
52.
BekesCEDellingerRPBrooksD, et al. Critical care medicine as a distinct product line with substantial financial profitability: the role of business planning. Crit Care Med2004; 32: 1207–1214.
