In this work we compare different implementations of two interatomic potential models, one the empirical Tersoff–Brenner and the other the semi-empirical tight-binding, to be used in the thermal transport study of silicon nanosystems. The calculations are based on molecular dynamics simulations. In the case of Tersoff–Brenner potential, two free software packages were used, while for tight-binding potential, an in-house code was developed. Both approaches require an enormous amount of computing effort, so the use of acceleration tools for adequate performance is crucial. We present a detailed study of each computational tool used: efficiency, advantages and disadvantages, and the results of application to the calculation of thermal conductance of structured silicon nanocrystals subjected to a temperature gradient.
XieXPLiangMHChooZM, et al. A comparative simulation study of silicon (001) surface reconstruction using different interatomic potentials. Surf Rev Lett2001; 8: 5.
2.
BuiDHYarmohammadiM. Direction-dependent electronic thermal conductivity and thermopower of single-layer black phosphorus in the presence of bias voltage and dilute charged impurity. Phys E Low Dim Syst Nanostruct2018; 103: 76–80.
3.
NeogiSReparazSPereiraLFC, et al. Tuning thermal transport in ultrathin silicon membranes by surface nanoscale engineering. ACS Nano2015; 9: 3820–3828.
WangCZChanCTHoKM. Empirical tight-binding force model for molecular-dynamics simulation of Si. Phys Rev B1989; 39: 8586.
10.
KwonIBiswasRWangCZ, et al. Transferable tight-binding models for silicon. Phys Rev B1994; 49: 7242.
11.
VoltzSShiomiJNomuraM, et al. Heat conduction in nanostructured materials. J Therm Sci Technol2016; 11: 1.
12.
HoussaMDimoulasAMolleA. 2D materials for nanoelectronics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
13.
AspelmeyerMKippenbergTJMarquardtF. Cavity optomechanics. Rev Mod Phys2014; 86: 1391.
14.
BalandinAAThermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nat Mater2011; 10: 569.
15.
Mancardo ViottiAMBeaEACaruselaMF, et al. Simulación del transporte de calor en nanoestructuras de silicio. Mecánica Computacional2018; 36: 2179–2187.
16.
BeaEACaruselaMFSobaA, et al. Thermal conductance of structured silicon nanocrystals. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng2020; 28: 075004.
17.
Sanz-NavarroCFGrimaRGarcíaA, et al. An efficient implementation of a QM–MM method in SIESTA. Theor Chem Acc Theor Computat Model (Theoretica Chimica Acta)2010; 128: 825–833.
SaadY. Numerical methods for large eigenvalue problems. Minneapolis: Manchester University Press, 1992.
26.
VinazzaDOteroASobaA, et al. Initial experiences from TUPAC supercomputer. Commun Comput Inform Sci2017; 796: 3–20.
27.
MooreS. Accelerating LAMMPS performance. In: 2017 LAMMPS workshop and symposium (ed MooreS), Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1–3 August 2017.
28.
NguyenTDCarrilloJYBrownMW. Experience with GPU acceleration for large-scale molecular dynamics simulations using LAMMPS. In: workshop on accelerated high-performance computing in computational sciences (eds NguyenTDCarrilloJYBrownWM) Trieste, Italy, 25 May–5 June 2015. Trieste: ICTP.
29.
NeogiSSebastian ReparazJPereiraLF, et al. Tuning thermal transport in ultrathin silicon membranes by surface nanoscale engineering. ACS Nano2015; 9: 3820-3828.
