This article analyzes the politics of financial climate risks. It focuses on the phenomena of ‘stranded assets’ and the ‘carbon bubble’: the problem that a consistent implementation of international climate goals could contribute to a massive devaluation of the assets of fossil capitalism. Finance experts frame this issue as a ‘tragedy of the horizon’ (Carney) because, they argue, present investment decisions do not properly account for their future effects. The article seeks to unsettle and expand this framing by arguing that financial climate risks do not only indicate a tragedy of a singular horizon – how to make the future count in the present – but a tragedy of multiple, intersecting horizons: how to make a particular horizon (climate) count in another (finance). The article shows how the very intelligibility of the problem of stranded assets relies on aligning different horizons ranging from climate goals to physical infrastructures, to financial investments. It illuminates the frictions and limits of such an endeavor. The dissonances between the different horizons go along with a ‘fundamental miscount’ (Rancière) that thwarts attempts to smoothly translate the signals of climate politics into financial markets. This suggests that even if finance becomes able to effectively manage financial climate risk and break the tragedy of the financial horizon, it might not break the tragedy of multiple horizons because it cannot prevent the climate catastrophe.
AitkenR. (2022). Depletion work: Climate change and the mediation of stranded assets. Socio-Economic Review, 21(1), 267–291.
3.
AykutS. C.CastroM. (2017). The end of fossil fuels? Understanding the partial climatisation of global energy debates. In AykutS. C.FoyerJ.MorenaE. (Eds.), Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates (pp. 173–193). Taylor & Francis.
4.
AykutS. C.FoyerJ.MorenaE. (2017). Globalising the climate: COP21 and the climatisation of global debates. Taylor & Francis.
5.
BeckS.MahonyM. (2017). The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change, 7(5), 311–313.
6.
BeckU. (2009). World at risk. Polity Press.
7.
BeckertJ. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Harvard University Press.
8.
BirchK. (2017). Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(3), 460–490.
9.
BlackRock. (2016). Adapting portfolios to climate change: Implications and strategies for all investors. BlackRock Investment Institute.
10.
BoltonP.KacperczykM. T. (2020). Carbon premium around the world. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14567. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3594188
11.
BosK.GuptaJ. (2018). Climate change: The risks of stranded fossil fuel assets and resources to the developing world. Third World Quarterly, 29(3), 463–453.
12.
BraunB. (2016). From performativity to political economy: Index investing, ETFs and asset manager capitalism. New Political Economy, 21(3), 257–273.
13.
BuckH. J. (2021). Ending fossil fuels: Why net zero is not enough. Verso.
14.
ÇalışkanK.CallonM. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.
CarneyM. (2015). Breaking the tragedy of the horizon: Climate change and financial stability. Bank of England.
17.
ChiapelloÈ. (2020). Stalemate for the financialization of climate policy. Economic Sociology_The European Electronic Newsletter, 22(1), 20–29.
18.
ChristophersB. (2017). Climate change and financial instability: Risk disclosure and the problematics of neoliberal governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(5), 1108–1127.
19.
CollierS. J.ElliottR.LehtonenT-K. (2021). Climate change and insurance. Economy and Society, 50(2), 158–172.
20.
CoxS. (2022). Inscriptions of resilience: Bond ratings and the government of climate risk in Greater Miami, Florida. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(2), 295–310.
21.
CTI. (2011). Unburnable carbon: Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bubble?Carbon Tracker Initiative.
22.
CTI. (2018). Mind the gap: The $ 1.6 trillion energy transition risk. Carbon Tracker Initiative.
23.
CTI. (2022). Unburnable carbon: Ten years on. Carbon Tracker Initiative.
24.
CTI & PRI. (2021). Flying blind: The glaring absence of climate risks in financial reporting. Carbon Tracker Initiative & Principles for Responsible Investment.
25.
DahanA. (2010). Putting the Earth System in a numerical box? The evolution from climate modeling toward global change. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41(3), 282–292.
26.
DoganovaL. (2024). Discounting the future: The ascendancy of a political technology. Zone Books.
27.
EhrensteinV. (2018). Carbon sink geopolitics. Economy and Society, 47(1), 162–186.
28.
FERI & WWF. (2017). Carbon Bubble und Dekarbonisierung. Unterschätzte Risiken für Investoren und Vermögensinhaber [Carbon bubble and decarbonization. Underestimated risks for investors and asset owners]. FERI Cognitive Finance Institute & World Wildlife Fund.
29.
FieldS. (2022). Carbon capital: The lexicon and allegories of US hydrocarbon finance. Economy and Society, 51(2), 235–258.
30.
FisherM. (2009). Capitalist realism: Is there no alternative?Zero Books.
31.
FolkersA. (2021). Fossil modernity: The materiality of acceleration, slow violence, and ecological futures. Time & Society, 30(2), 223–246.
FolkersA.OpitzS. (2022). Low-carbon cows: From microbial metabolism to the symbiotic planet. Social Studies of Science, 52(3), 330–352.
34.
GaborD. (2021). The wall street consensus. Development and Change, 52(3), 429–459.
35.
GierynT. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.
36.
IEA. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency.
37.
KoselleckR. (2004). Future past: On the semantics of historical time. Columbia University Press.
38.
KrauseF.BachW.KoomeyJ. (1992). Energy policy in the greenhouse: From warming fate to warming limit. Routledge.
39.
KuhnH. (1940). The phenomenological concept of ‘horizon’. In FarberM. (Ed.), Philosophical essays in memory of Edmund Husserl (pp. 106–123). Harvard University Press.
40.
LahnB. (2021). Changing climate change: The carbon budget and the modifying-work of the IPCC. Social Studies of Science, 51(1), 3–27.
41.
LangleyP.BridgeG.BulkeleyH.van VeelenB. (2021). Decarbonizing capital: Investment, divestment and the qualification of carbon assets. Economy and Society, 50(3), 494–516.
42.
LatourB. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
43.
Le BillonP.KristoffersenB. (2020). Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1072–1092.
44.
LentonT. M.HeldH.KrieglerE.HallJ. W.LuchtW.RahmstorfS.SchellnhuberH. J. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6), 1786–1793.
45.
LuhmannN. (1992). Die Beschreibung der Zukunft [The description of the future]. In Beobachtungen der Moderne [Observations of modernity] (pp. 129–147). VS-Verlag
46.
LuhmannN. (1994). Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft [The economy of society]. Suhrkamp.
47.
MakropoulosM. (1999). Grenze und Horizont: Zwei soziale Abschlußparadigmen [Border and horizon. Two paradigms of closure]. In HoneggerC. (Ed.), Grenzenlose Gesellschaft? [Boundless society?] (pp. 387–396). Leske + Budrich.
48.
MitchellT. (2020). The body politic that captured the future. In LatourB.SchafferS.GagliardiP. (Eds.), A book of the body politic: Connecting biology, politics and social theory (pp. 49–74). Fondazione Giorgio Cini.
49.
MuniesaF.DoganovaL.OrtizH.Pina-StrangerÁ.PatersonF.BourgoinA.EhrensteinV.JuvenP-A.PontilleD.Saraç-LesavreB.YonG. (2017). Capitalization: A cultural guide. Presses de Mines.
50.
MuniesaF.LinhardtD. (2011). Trials of explicitness in the implementation of public management reform. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(6), 550–566.
51.
PatelR.MooreJ. W. (2017). The history of the world in seven cheap things: A guide to capitalism, nature, and the future of the planet. University of California Press.
52.
PetrynaA. (2022). Horizon work: At the edges of knowledge in an age of runaway climate change. Princeton University Press.
53.
RancièreJ. (1998). Disagreement: Politics and philosophy. University of Minnesota Press.
54.
TCFD. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
55.
TsingA. L. (2003). Natural resources and capitalist frontiers. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48), 5100–5106.
56.
UN. (2015). Paris agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
57.
UNFCCC. (2023). First global stocktake. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
58.
UnruhG. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.
59.
WBGU. (2009). Kassensturz für den Weltklimavertrag. Der Budgetansatz. [Cash check for world climate treaty. The budget approach]. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen.
60.
WelsbyD.PriceJ.PyeS.EkinsP. (2021). Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 C world. Nature, 597(7875), 230–234.
61.
WoodC. L. (2016). Inside the halo zone: Geology, finance, and the corporate performance of profit in a deep tight oil formation. Economic Anthropology, 3(1), 43–56.
