The article explores some specific consequences of a ‘crisis of legitimation’ for relations of power. Drawing together sociological concerns over power/knowledge with anthropological understandings about the place of materials in the ordering of relations, the article analyses how authority is legitimated in the context of multiple possibilities for interpretation and conduct. The site of exploration is an ethnography of multi-disciplinary work in a British hospital trust. Developing the notion of ‘extension’ the article describes how hospital consultants align social practices and cultural materials to (re)accomplish asymmetrical power relations. The article revisits Lyotard’s (1984) ideas about ‘strong moves’ and ends by arguing for greater sociological attention to the place of materials in the ordering of relations.
Becker, G. and Sharon R. Kaufman (1995) ‘Managing an Uncertain Illness Trajectory in Old Age: Patients’ and Physicians’ Views of Stroke’ , Medical Anthropology Quarterly9(2): 165-187 .
2.
Clegg, S. (1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage .
3.
Deetz, S. (1992) ‘Disciplinary Power in the Modern Corporation’, in M. Alvesson and H. Willmott (eds) Critical Management Studies. London: Sage .
4.
Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: a Plan for Investment. London: Stationery Office .
5.
Douglas, M. and B. Isherwood (1980) The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. Harmondsworth: Penguin .
6.
Fairclough, N. (1992) ‘Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis’ , Discourse and Society3(2): 193-217 .
7.
Foucault, M. (1980) ‘The Eye of Power’, in C. Gordon (ed.) Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
8.
Foucault, M. (1991a) ‘Politics and the Study of Discourse’, in G. Burchell , C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentalility. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
9.
Foucault, M. (1991b) ‘Governmentality’, in G. Burchell , C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentalility. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
10.
Geertz, C. (1993) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. London: Fontana Press .
11.
Goffman, E. (1958) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre, Monograph No.2.
12.
Habermas, J. (1986) On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action, (trans. by Barbara Fultner). Cambridge: Polity .
13.
Housley, W. (2000) ‘Story, Narrative and Teamwork’ , Sociological Review48(3): 425-443 .
14.
Kalinikos, J. (1996) Technology and Society. Interdisciplinary Studies in Formal Organisation. Munich: Accedo .
15.
Latimer, J. (1997a) ‘Giving Patients a Future: The Constituting of Classes in an Acute Medical Unit’ , Sociology of Health and Illness19(2): 160-185 .
16.
Latimer, J. (1997b) ‘Older People in Hospital: The Labour of Division, Affirmation and the Stop’, in K. Hetherington and R. Munro (eds) Ideas of Difference: Social Spaces and the Labour of Division, pp. 273-297. Sociological Review Monograph. Oxford: Blackwell .
17.
Latimer, J. (1999) ‘The Dark at the Bottom of the Stair: Participation and Performance of Older People in Hospital’ , Medical Anthropology Quarterly13(2): 186-213 .
18.
Latimer, J. (2000a) ‘Distributing Knowledge and Accountability in Medical Work. An Ethnographic Study of Multi-disciplinary Interaction’, Cardiff School of Social Sciences Working Paper 6, URL (consulted May 2004): http://www.cf.ac.uk/socsi/
19.
Latimer, J. (2000b) The Conduct of Care. Understanding Nursing Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Science .
20.
Latimer, J. (2001) ‘All-consuming Passions: Materials and Subjectivity in the Age of Enhancement’, in N. Lee and R. Munro (eds) The Consumption of Mass. Sociological Review Monographs. Oxford: Blackwell .
21.
Latour, B. (1991) ‘Technology is Society Made Durable’, in J. Law (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge .
22.
Lyotard, J.F. (1984) The Post-modern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press .
23.
Munro, R. (1996a) ‘Alignments and Identity-work: The Study of Accounts and Accountability’, in R. Munro and J. Mouritsen Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing. London: Thomson International Business Press .
24.
Munro, R. (1996b) ‘The Consumption View of Self: Extension, Exchange and Identity’, in S. Edgell , K. Hetherington and A. Warde (eds) Consumption Matters, pp. 248-273. Sociological Review Monograph. Oxford: Blackwell .
25.
Øvretveit, J. (1994) Coordinating Community-care: Multidisciplinary Teams and Care Management. Buckingham: Open University Press .
26.
Rabinow, P. and W.M. Sullivan (1979) ‘The Interpretive Turn: Emergence of an Approach’, in P. Rabinow and W.M. Sullivan Interpretive Social Science: A Reader. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
27.
Saferstein, B. (1992) ‘Collective Cognition and Collaborative Work: The Effects of Cognitive and Communicative Processes on the Organisation of Television Production’ , Discourse and Society3(1): 61-86 .
28.
Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage .
29.
Strathern, M. (1991) Partial Connections. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
30.
Strathern, M. (2003) ‘Abstraction and Decontextualisation: An Anthropological Comment or: e for Ethnography’, URL (consulted May 2004): http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
