The Dialectical Tension Between Individuation and Depersonalization in Cancer Patients' Mediation of Complementary,Alternative and Biomedical Cancer Treatments

Abstract

Drawing on in-depth interviews with cancer patients, this article examines patients' perspectives on the nature of evidence and the degree to which different understandings of evidence inform decision-making about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and biomedical cancer treatments. Results illustrate the ways in which many cancer patients critically engage with questions about the nature of knowledge and the potential pitfalls of science.Their accounts can largely be characterized by a dialectical tension between individuation (espoused by many CAM therapies) and depersonalization (implicit in biomedical care); a tension mediated by individual cancer patient's prognosis and age. On the basis of the results we argue for a re-focusing of social theory to embrace an understanding of grass-roots ontological tensions seen in the experiences of individual cancer patients.The problematic nature of maintaining a narrowly defined `evidence-base' policy on CAM and cancer is also discussed in light of the data.

Keywords

cancer complementary medicine evidence-based medicine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anspach, R. (1988) `Notes on the Sociology of Medical Discourse', Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 29: 357—75.

Bakx, K. (1991) `The “Eclipse” of Folk Medicine in Western Society', Sociology of Health and Illness 13: 20—38.

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. London: Sage.

Bishop, F. and L. Yardley (2004) `Constructing Agency in Treatment Decisions', Health 8(4): 465—82.

Borgerson, K. (2005) `Evidence-Based Alternative Medicine?' Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48(4): 502—15.

Broom, A. (2002) `Contested Territories: The Construction of Boundaries Between “Alternative” and “Conventional” Cancer Treatments ', New Zealand Journal of Sociology 17(2): 215—34.

Broom, A. and P. Tovey (2007) `Therapeutic Pluralism? Evidence, Power and Legitimacy in UK Cancer Services', Sociology of Health and Illness 29(3): 551—69.

Cassileth, B. and A. Vickers (2005) `High Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Cancer Patients', Journal of Clinical Oncology 23: 2590—2.

Charmaz, K. (1990) ` “Discovering” Chronic Illness: Using Grounded Theory', Social Science and Medicine 30(11): 1161—72.

10.

Department of Health (2000) NHS Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health.

11.

Department of Health (2004) The NHS Cancer Plan and the New NHS. London: Department of Health.

12.

Doel, M. and J. Segrott (2003) `Self, Health, and Gender: Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the British Mass Media', Gender, Place and Culture 10(2): 131—44.

13.

Eastwood, H. (2000) `Postmodernisation, Consumerism and the Shift Towards Holistic Health', Journal of Sociology 36: 133—55.

14.

Ernst, E. (2001) The Desktop guide to CAM. Edinburgh : Mosby.

15.

Ernst, E. and S. Cassileth (1998) `The Prevalence of Complementary/Alternative Medicine in Cancer: A Systematic Review', Cancer 83: 777—82.

16.

Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

17.

House of Lords (2000) Report on Complementary and Alternative Medicine. London: House of Lords.

18.

Kaptchuk, T. and D. Eisenberg (1998) `The Persuasive Appeal of Alternative Medicine ', Annals of Internal Medicine 129(12): 1061—5.

19.

Lewith, G. , J. Broomfield and P. Prescott (2002) `Complementary Cancer Care in Southampton', Complementary Therapies in Medicine 10: 100—6.

20.

Low, J. (2004) `Managing Safety and Risk', Health 8(4): 445—63.

21.

Lupton, D. and J. Tulloch (2002) `Risk is Part of Your Life: Risk Epistemologies Among a Group of Australians', Sociology 36(2): 317—35.

22.

McClean, S. (2005) ```The Illness is Part of the Person”: Discourses of Blame, Individual Responsibility and Individuation at a Centre for Spiritual Healing in the North of England', Sociology of Health & Illness 27(5): 628—48.

23.

Morris, K. , N. Johnston , L. Homer and D. Walts (2000) `A Comparison of Complementary Therapy Use Between Breast Cancer Patients and Patients with Other Primary Tumor Sites', American Journal of Surgery 179(5): 407—11.

24.

Mykhalovskiy, E. (2003) `Evidence-Based Medicine: Ambivalent Reading and the Clinical Recontextualization of Science', Health 7(3): 331—52.

25.

Pope, C. (2003) `Resisting Evidence: The Study of Evidence-Based Medicine as a Contemporary Social Movement', Health 7(3): 267—82.

26.

Rayner, L. and G. Easthope (2001) `Postmodern Consumption and Alternative Medications ', Journal of Sociology 37(2): 157—76.

27.

Siahpush, M. (1998) `Postmodern Values, Dissatisfaction With Conventional Medicine and Popularity of Alternative Therapies', Journal of Sociology 34(1): 58—70.

28.

Sointu, E. (2006) `Recognition and the Creation of Wellbeing', Sociology 40(3): 493—510.

29.

Tavares, M. (2003) National Guidelines for the Use of Complementary Therapies in Supportive and Palliative Care. London: The Prince of Wales' Foundation for Integrated Health.

30.

Tovey, P. and J. Adams (2003) `Nostalgic and Nostophobic Referencing and the Authentication of Nurses' Use of Complementary Therapies', Social Science and Medicine 56: 1469—80.

31.

Tovey, P. , K. Atkin and T. Milewa (2001) `The Individual and Primary Care: Service User, Reflexive Choice Maker and Collective Actor', Critical Public Health 11(2): 153—66.