The rise of digital technologies has the potential to open new directions in ethnography. Despite the ubiquity of these technologies, their infiltration into popular sociological research methods is still limited compared to the insatiable uptake of online scholarly research portals. This article argues that social researchers cannot afford to continue this trend. Building upon pioneering work in `digital ethnography', I critically examine the possibilities and problems of four new technologies — online questionnaires, digital video, social networking websites, and blogs — and their potential impacts on the research relationship. The article concludes that a balanced combination of physical and digital ethnography not only gives researchers a larger and more exciting array of methods, but also enables them to demarginalize the voice of respondents. However, access to these technologies remains stratified by class, race, and gender of both researchers and respondents.
Alaszewski, A. (2006) Using Diaries for Social Research. London: SAGE.
2.
Anderson, B. and K. Tracey (2002) `Digital Living: The Impact (or Otherwise) of the Internet on Everyday British Life', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 139-63. Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Andrejevic, M. (2004) `The Webcam Subculture and the Digital Enclosure' , in N. Couldry and A. McCarthy (eds) MediaSpace: Place, Scale, and Culture in a Media Age, pp. 193-208. London: Routledge .
4.
Bailey, C.A. (2007) A Guide to Qualitative Field Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5.
Barsky, E. and M. Purdon (2006) `Introducing Web 2.0: Social Networking and Social Bookmarking for Health Librarians', Journal of the Canadian Health Library Association27(3): 65-7.
6.
Becker, H.S. (1974) `Photography and Sociology', Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication1: 3-26.
7.
Behar, R. and D.A. Gordon (eds) (1995) Women Writing Culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
Benjamin, W. (1969) Illuminations. New York: Schocken Books.
9.
Blee, K.M. (2002) Inside Organized Racism: Women in the Hate Movement . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
Bohman, J. (2004) `Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy', in N. Crossley and J.M. Roberts (eds) After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere, pp. 131-55. Oxford: Blackwell.
11.
Brewer, J. and A. Hunter (2006) Foundations of Multimethod Research: Synthesizing Styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE .
12.
Bruckman, A. (2002) `Studying the Amateur Artist: A Perspective on Disguising Data Collected in Human Subjects Research on the Internet', Ethics and Information Technology4(3): 217-31.
13.
Chalfen, R. and M. Rich (2004) `Applying Visual Research: Patients Teaching Physicians about Asthma through Video Diaries', Visual Anthropology Review20(1): 17-30.
14.
Coleman, S. and E. Normann (2000) New Media and Social Inclusion. London: Hansard Society.
15.
Coover, R. (2004) `Using Digital Media Tools and Cross-Cultural Research , Analysis and Representation', Visual Studies19(1): 6-25.
16.
Couldry, N. and A. McCarthy (eds) (2004) MediaSpace: Place, Scale, and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge.
17.
Crang, M. and I. Cook (2007) Doing Ethnographies. London : SAGE.
18.
Cressey, P.G. (1932) The Taxi-Dance Hall: A Sociological Study in Commercialized Recreation and City Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Denzin, N.K. (1999) `Cybertalk and the Method of Instances', in S.G. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 107-26. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
20.
Dicks, B., B. Mason, A. Coffey and P. Atkinson (2005) Qualitative Research and Hypermedia: Ethnography for the Digital Age. London: SAGE .
21.
Dicks, B., B. Soyinka and A. Coffey (2006) `Multimodal Ethnography', Qualitative Research6(1): 77-96.
22.
Dolan, J. (2006) `Blogging on Queer Connections in the Arts and the Five Lesbian Brothers', GLQ12(3): 491-506.
23.
Duneier, M. (1999) Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24.
Dyson, E. (1997) Release 2.0: A Design for Living in the Digital Age. London: Viking.
25.
Ebo, B. (1998) `Internet or Outernet?', in B. Ebo (ed.) Cyberghetto or Cybertopia? Race, Class, and Gender on the Internet, pp. 1-12. Westport, CT: Praeger .
26.
Ess, C. (2002) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research, Association of Internet Researchers, URL (consulted May 2008): http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
27.
Fielding, N. (1981) The National Front. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
28.
Fletcher, K. (2007) `Why Blogs Are an Open Door', British Journalism Review18(2): 41-6.
29.
Flick, U. (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
30.
Gabriel, J. (1998) Whitewash: Racialized Politics and the Media. New York: Routledge.
31.
Garton, L., C. Haythornthwaite and B. Wellman (1999) `Studying On-Line Social Networks', in S.G. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 75-106. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
32.
Gates, B. (1996) The Road Ahead. London: Penguin.
33.
Gore, A. (1994) Remarks by Vice President Al Gore. Speech delivered at the Superhighway Summit, Royce Hall, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles.
34.
Gunter, B., D. Nicholas, P. Huntington and P. Williams (2002) `Online Versus Offline Research: Implications for Evaluating Digital Media', Aslib Proceedings54(4): 229-39.
35.
Harp, D. and M. Tremayne (2006) `The Gendered Blogosphere: Examining Inequality Using Network and Feminist Theory', Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly83(2): 247-64.
36.
Hewitt, H. (2005) Blog: Understanding the Information Reformation that's Changing your World. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
37.
Humphreys, L. (1970) Tearoom Trade: A Study of Homosexual Encounters in Public Places. London: Duckworth .
38.
Jenkins, H. (2006) Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press.
39.
Jones, S.G. (ed.) (1999) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
Kent, T. (1993) Paralogic Rhetoric: A Theory of Communicative Interaction . Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses.
41.
Kozinets, R.V. (2002) `The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities', Journal of Marketing Research39(1): 61-72.
42.
Lassiter, L.E. (2005) The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Lee, R.M. (2004) `Recording Technologies and the Interview in Sociology, 1920-2000', Sociology38(5): 869-89.
44.
Leece, P., M. Bhandari, S. Sprague, M. Swiontkowski, E. Schemitsch, P. Tornetta, P. Devereaux and G. Guyatt (2004) `Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison', Journal of Medical Internet Research6(3): e30.
45.
Maag, M. (2006) `Podcasting and MP3 Players: Emerging Education Technologies', CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing24(1): 9-13.
46.
Magnet, S. (2007) `Feminist Sexualities, Race and the Internet: An Investigation of Suicidegirls.Com', New Media & Society9(4): 577-602.
47.
Miller, D. and D. Slater (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.
48.
Mitra, A. (2004) `Voices of the Marginalized on the Internet: Examples from a Website for Women of South Asia', Journal of Communication54(3): 492-510.
49.
Moss, J. and G. Hendry (2002) `Use of Electronic Surveys in Course Evaluation' , British Journal of Educational Technology33(5): 583-92.
50.
Murthy, D. (2007a) `Communicative Flows between the Diaspora and "Homeland": The Case of Asian Electronic Music in Delhi', Journal of Creative Communication2(1&2): 143-61.
51.
Murthy, D. (2007b) `A South Asian American Diasporic Aesthetic Community? Ethnicity and New York City's "Asian Electronic Music" Scene', Ethnicities7(2): 225-47.
52.
Murthy, D. (2008) `Globalization and South Asian Musical Subcultures: An Investigation into Ethnic Identity Formation amongst Indians and Diasporic South Asians in Delhi, London, and New York City', [unpublished] PhD Thesis, Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge.
53.
Negroponte, N. (1995) Being Digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
54.
Neuman, W.L. (2006) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Pearson.
55.
O'Reilly, K. (2005) Ethnographic Methods. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.
56.
Pink, S. (2007) Doing Visual Ethnography. London : SAGE.
57.
Richman, A. (2007) `The Outsider Lurking Online: Adults Researching Youth Cybercultures', in A.L. Best (ed.) Representing Youth: Methodological Issues in Critical Youth Studies , pp. 182-202. New York: New York University Press.
58.
Sassen, S. (2002) `Towards a Sociology of Information Technology' , Current Sociology50(3): 365-88.
59.
Schaap, F. (2002) The Words that Took Us There: Ethnography in a Virtual Reality. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
60.
Schaefer, D.R. and D.A. Dillman (1998) `Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment', Public Opinion Quarterly62(3): 378-97.
61.
Schrum, L. (1995) `Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age', Qualitative Inquiry1(3): 311-26.
62.
Senft, T. (Forthcoming) Camgirls: Celebrity and Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.
63.
Sharf, B.F. (1999) `Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet', in S.G. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 243-56. Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
64.
Sharp, K. and S. Earle (2003) `Cyberpunters and Cyberwhores: Prostitution on the Internet', in Y. Jewkes (ed.) Dot.cons: Crime, Deviance and Identity on the Internet, pp. 36-52. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
65.
Silver, D. (2000) `Margins in the Wires: Looking for Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Blacksburg Electronic Village', in B.E. Kolko, L. Nakamura and G.B. Rodman (eds) Race in Cyberspace, pp. 133-50. New York: Routledge.
66.
Silverman, D. (2005) Doing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
67.
Silverman, D. (ed.) (2006) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: SAGE.
68.
Simpson, W. (2006) Video Over IP: A Practical Guide to Technology and Applications. Oxford: Focal Press.
69.
Slater, D. (1999) `Trading Sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and Authenticity on the Internet', Body and Society4(4): 91-117.
70.
ten Have, P. (2004) Understanding Qualitative Research and Ethnomethodology . London: SAGE.
71.
Thomas, S.J. (2004) Using Web and Paper Questionnaires for Data-Based Decision-Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
72.
Toulouse, C. (1998) `Introduction to the Politics of Cyberspace', in C. Toulouse and T.W. Luke (eds) The Politics of Cyberspace: A New Political Science Reader, pp. 1-17. London: Routledge.
73.
Van Selm, M. and N.W. Jankowski (2006) `Conducting Online Surveys', Quality and Quantity40(3): 435-56.
74.
Viégas, F.B. (2005) `Bloggers' Expectations of Privacy and Accountability: An Initial Survey', Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10(3).
75.
Wagner, G.G., R. Pischner and J.P. Haisken-DeNew (2002) `The Changing Digital Divide in Germany', in B. Wellman and C. Haythornwaite (eds) The Internet in Everyday Life, pp. 164-79. Oxford: Blackwell.
76.
Waldfogel, J. (2007) `Lost' on the Web: Does Web Distribution Stimulate or Depress Television Viewing?, NBER Working Papers. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
77.
Walker, J. (2006) `Blogging from inside the Ivory Tower', in A. Bruns and J. Jacobs (eds) Uses of Blogs, pp. 127-38. New York: Peter Lang.
78.
Whyte, W.F. (1993[1943]) Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
