Cosmopolitanism as a Form of Capital

Abstract

This article evaluates cosmopolitan theory by exploring how parents perceive cosmopolitanism. Interviews with parents whose children attend an internationalized form of education revealed that parents viewed cosmopolitanism as a form of cultural and social capital, rather than feelings of global connectedness or curiosity in the Other. Dedicated cosmopolitan parents were distinguished from pragmatic cosmopolitans.The former taught their children to explore the world and to take a global perspective on their course of life, while the latter thought that globalizing processes required cosmopolitan competencies. Analyses of survey data showed that parents' inclination to provide children with cosmopolitan capital was related to their own cosmopolitan capital and their level of ambitions, but not to their social class position. The article concludes that cosmopolitanism should be viewed as an expression of agency, which is acted out when people are forced to deal with processes of globalization.

Keywords

cosmopolitan capital cosmopolitanism globalization international education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albrow, M. (1997) `Travelling beyond Local Cultures: Socioscapes in a Global City', in J. Eade (ed.) Living the Global City. Globalization as a Local Process, pp. 37-55. London: Routledge.

Beck, U. and N. Sznaider (2006) `Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda', British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 1-23.

Bourdieu, P. (1986) `The Forms of Capital', in J.G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241-58. New York: Greenwood.

Brown, P. (2000) `Globalisation of Positional Competition', Sociology 34(4): 633-54.

Delanty, G. (2006) `The Cosmopolitan Imagination: Critical Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory', The British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 25-47.

Erikson, R. , J.H. Goldthorpe and L. Portocarero (1979) `Intergenerational Class Mobility in Three Western Countries', British Journal of Sociology 30(4): 415-41.

European Foundation (2003) Working-Time Preferences and Work-Life Balance in the EU: Some Policy Considerations for Enhancing the Quality of Life. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

Friedman, J. (2000) `Americans Again, or the New Age of Imperial Reason? Global Elite Formation, its Identity and Ideological Discourses', Theory, Culture and Society 17(1): 139-46.

Fruhauf, G. (ed.) (1996) Teaching Content in a Foreign Language. Practice and Perspectives in European Bilingual Education. Alkmaar: Foundation European Platform for Dutch Education [Stichting Europees Platform voor het Nederlandse Onderwijs].

10.

Hannerz, U. (2000) Transnational Connections. Culture, People, Places . London: Routledge.

11.

Jones, C.A. (1987) International Business in the Nineteenth Century. The Rise and Fall of a Cosmopolitan Bourgeoisie. Brighton : Wheatsheaf Books.

12.

Marceau, J. (1989) A Family Business? The Making of an International Business Elite. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

13.

Merton, R.K. (1957) `Patterns of Influence: Local and Cosmopolitan Influentials', in Robert K. Merton (ed.) Social Theory and Social Structure, rev. and enlarged edn, p. 414. New York: Free Press.

14.

Molz, J.G. (2006) `Cosmopolitan Bodies: Fit to Travel and Travelling to Fit', Body & Society 12(3): 1-21.

15.

Moss Kanter, R. (1997) World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy . New York: Touchstone Books.

16.

Oonk, H. (2004) `De Europese integratie als bron van onderwijsinnovatie. Een onderzoek naarde betekenis en de resultaten van de internationalisering in het voortgezet onderwijs in Nederland' [European integration as a source of innovation in education. A study of the meaning of internationalisation and its results in secondary education in the Netherlands], PhD Thesis, Europees Platform voor het Nederlandse Onderwijs/Universiteit van Amsterdam.

17.

Sklair, L. (2001) The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford: Blackwell.

18.

Szerszynski, B. and J. Urry (2002) `Cultures of Cosmopolitanism', The Sociological Review 50(4): 461-81.

19.

Szerszynski, B. and J. Urry (2006) `Visuality, Mobility and the Cosmopolitan: Inhabiting the World from Afar', British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 113-31.

20.

Tomlinson, J. (1999) Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.

21.

Ultee, W.C. (1989) Economische eenwording, groter wordende sociale afstanden blijvende culturele verscheidenheid? [Economic unification, increasing social distances, lasting cultural diversity?] Inaugural Speech as Professor in Sociology. Nijmegen: Catholic University of Nijmegen.

22.

Van der Pijl, K. (1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations . London: Routledge.

23.

Wagner, A.-C. (1998) Les nouvelles elites de la mondialisation. Une immigration doree en France. Paris: PUF.

24.

Weenink, D. (2007) `Cosmopolitan and Established Resources of Power in the Education Arena', International Sociology 22(4): 492-516.

25.

Wright, E.O. (1997) Class Counts. Comparative Studies in Class Analysis . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.