A parallel is drawn in this article between influential theoretical perspectives on the contemporary culture of romantic intimacy, and Durkheimian interpretations of modernity, individualism and social solidarity.The author sketches generalities of Durkheim's account of individualism and solidarity in modern society; this sketch serves as a heuristic for cataloguing and distilling North American and European theories of contemporary intimacy that have emerged post-1960. Scholarly discourse on intimacy is shown to share rhetorical and substantive ground with Durkheimian understandings of individual interest and social obligation. Self-development and collective ties, and the potential for these to be mutually reinforcing, are central concerns in intimacy theory.Though not commonly engaged in such a manner, perspectives on contemporary intimacy present an opportunity to explore personal relationships in a style uniquely consistent with the generalist inclinations of past sociological traditions, and to move beyond heavily normative claims about individualism in intimacy.
Adler, M.A. (2004) `Child-Free and Unmarried: Changes in the Life Planning of Young East German Women', Journal of Marriage and Family66(5): 1170-9.
2.
Alexander, J.C. (2005) `The Inner Development of Durkheim's Sociological Theory: From Early Writings to Maturity', in J.C. Alexander and P. Smith (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, pp. 136-59. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Axinn, W.G. and A. Thornton (2000) `The Transformation in the Meaning of Marriage' , in Linda J. Waite (ed.) The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, pp. 147-65. New York: de Gruyter.
4.
Bauman, Z. (2002) Society under Siege. Cambridge : Polity.
5.
Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
6.
Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love . Cambridge: Polity.
7.
Beck, U. and E. Beck-Gernsheim (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
8.
Bell, D. (1976) The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Bellah, R.N., R. Madsen, W.M. Sullivan, A. Swidler and S.M. Tipton (1985) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10.
Blair-Loy, M. (2001) `Cultural Constructions of Family Schemas: The Case of Women Finance Executives', Gender and Society15(5): 687-709.
11.
Cancian, F.M. (1987) Love in America: Gender and Self-development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Cancian, F.M. and S.L. Gordon (1988) `Changing Emotion Norms in Marriage: Love and Anger in US Women's Magazines since 1900', Gender & Society2(3): 308-42.
13.
Cherlin, A. (1990) `Recent Changes in American Fertility, Marriage and Divorce', Annals of the American Academy (AAPSS)510(July): 145-55.
14.
Cherlin, A. (1992) Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Cherlin, A. (1999) Public and Private Families: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill College Press.
16.
Cherlin, A. (2004) `The Deinstitutionalization ofAmerican Marriage', Journal of Marriage and Family66(4): 848-61.
17.
Dryden, C. (1999) Being Married, Doing Gender: A Critical Analysis of Gender Relationships in Marriage. New York: Routledge.
18.
Durkheim, E. (1997[1893]) The Division of Labour in Society, transl. W.D. Halls.New York: The Free Press.
19.
Gerson, K. (2000) `Resolving Family Dilemmas and Conflicts: Beyond Utopia', Contemporary Sociology29(10): 180-7.
20.
Gerson, K. (2002) `Moral Dilemmas, Moral Strategies, and the Transformation of Gender: Lessons from Two Generations of Work and Family Change', Gender & Society16(1): 8-28.
21.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.
22.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
Goldstein, J.R. and C.T. Kenney (2001) `Marriage Delayed or Marriage Forgone? New Cohort Forecasts of First Marriage for U.S. Women', American Sociological Review66(4): 506-19.
24.
Gross, N. (2005) `The Detraditionalization of Intimacy Reconsidered' , Sociological Theory23(3): 286-311.
25.
Hays, S. (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Hazelden, R. (2004) `The Pathology of Love in Contemporary Relationship Manuals', The Sociological Review52(2): 201-17.
27.
Hochschild, A.R. (2003) The Commercialization of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
Holmes, M. (2004) `An Equal Distance? Individualization, Gender and Intimacy in Distance Relationships', The Sociological Review52(2): 180-200.
29.
Illouz, E. (1997) Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
30.
Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies . Cambridge: Polity.
31.
Jamieson, L. (1999) `Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the "Pure Relationship"', Sociology33(3): 477-94.
32.
Jamieson, L., M. Andersen, D. McCrone, F. Bechhofer, R. Stewart and Y. Li (2002) `Cohabitation and Commitment: Partnership Plans of Young Men and Women', The Sociological Review50(3): 356-77.
33.
Kipnis, L. (2003) Against Love: A Polemic. New York: Pantheon Books.
34.
Lasch, C. (1977) Haven in a Heartless World: The Family Besieged . New York: Basic Books.
35.
Lasch, C. (1979) The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W.W. Norton.
36.
Lewis, J. (2001) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
37.
Lichterman, P. (1995) `Beyond the Seesaw Model: Public Commitment in a Culture of Self-Fulfillment', Sociological Theory13(3): 275-300.
38.
Marske, C.E. (1987) `Durkheim's "Cult of the Individual" and the Moral Reconstitution of Society', Sociological Theory5(Spring): 1-14.
39.
Popenoe, D. (1993) `American Family Decline, 1960-1990: A Review and Appraisal', Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 527-55.
40.
Popenoe, D., J.B. Elshtain and D. Blankenhorn (eds) ( 1996) Promises to Keep: Decline and Renewal of Marriage in America . London: Rowman & Littlefield .
41.
Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster .
42.
Raley, K. (2000) `Recent Trends and Differentials in Marriage and Cohabitation: The United States', in L.J. Waite (ed.) The Ties That Bind: Perspectives on Marriage and Cohabitation, pp. 16-39. New York: de Gruyter .
43.
Rieff, P. (1966) The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith after Freud. New York: Harper and Row .
44.
Riesman, D. (1950) The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Sassler, S. (2004) `The Process of Entering into Cohabiting Unions' , Journal of Marriage and Family66(2): 491-505.
46.
Scott, J., D.F. Alwin and M. Braun (1996) `Generational Changes in Gender-Role Attitudes: Britain in a Cross-National Perspective', Sociology30(3): 471-92.
47.
Seidman, S. (1991) Romantic Longings: Love in America, 1830-1980. New York: Routledge.
48.
Sennett, R. (1977) The Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf Publishers.
49.
Stacey, J. (1990) Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America. New York: Basic Books.
50.
Waite, L.J. and M. Gallagher (2000) The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Healthier, Happier and Better off Financially. New York: Broadway Books.
51.
Wilcox, W.B. and S.L. Nock (2006) `What's Love Got to Do With It? Equality, Equity, Commitment and Women's Marital Quality', Social Forces84(3): 1321-44.
52.
Wuthnow, R. (1991) Acts of Compassion: Caring for Others and Helping Ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
