Paternity Uncertainty and Evolutionary Psychology: How a Seemingly Capricious Occurrence Fails to Follow Laws of Greater Generality

Abstract

Evolutionary psychologists aspire to show how —contrary to `soft' social sciences such as sociology — `seemingly capricious' occurrences in the realm of human behaviour follow biologistic `laws of greater generality' (Pinker, 2005: xii).This article is a case study of the `seemingly capricious occurrence' of paternity uncertainty. According to evolutionary psychologists, paternity uncertainty arises from the fact that men are `hard wired' to seek as many sexual partners as they can, and women to seek men of superior genetic quality. This account is said to be demonstrable through independent biological evidence of widespread discrepancy between putative and actual biological paternity in human populations.Yet close scrutiny of biological evidence and new evidence from representative sex surveys indicate that evolutionary psychologists consistently inflate estimates of paternal discrepancy. Evolutionary psychologists' account of paternity uncertainty highlights their overattachment to biologistic laws at the expense of understanding the social dimensions of human behaviour.

Keywords

evolutionary psychology fatherhood infidelity marriage non-paternity parenting paternal discrepancy paternity uncertainty sexuality sociobiology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AABB (American Association of Blood Banks) ( 1991-2004) Annual Report Summary for Testing 1991-2004 . Bethesda, MD: Parentage Testing Standards Program Unit.

Anderson, K. (2006) `How Well Does Paternity Confidence Match Actual Paternity? Evidence from Worldwide Nonpaternity Rates', Current Anthropology 47: 513-20.

Baker, R. (2000[1996]) Sperm Wars. London: Pan.

BBC News (2005) `One in 25 Fathers "Not the Daddy"', URL (consulted March 2007): http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4137506.stm

Bellis, M.A. and R.R. Baker (1990) `Do Females Promote Sperm Competition? Data for Humans', Animal Behaviour 40: 997-9.

Bellis, M. , K. Hughes , S. Hughes and J. Ashton (2005) `Measuring Paternal Discrepancy and its Public Health Consequences', Journal of Epidemiological and Community Health 59(9): 749-54.

Boardman, F. (1998) Letter included in House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 19 February 1998: Child Support Agency. London : House of Commons.

Brock, D. and A. Shrimpton (1991) `Non-Paternity and Prenatal Genetic Screening' , Lancet 338: 1151.

Buss, D.M. (ed.) (2005) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

10.

Campbell, A. (2005) `Aggression', in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 628-52. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

11.

Canadian Children's Rights Council (2007) URL (consulted August 2007): http://www.canadiancrc.com/articles/BBC_Paternity_Fraud_Study_UK_John_Moores_University_10AUG05.htm

12.

Chataway, J. , S. Sawser and R. Feakes (1999) `A Screen of Candidates from Peaks of Linkage' , Journal of Neuroimmunology 98: 208-13.

13.

China Daily (2005) `Is Your Child Really Your Child?', URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-08/12/content_468379.htm

14.

Dads in Distress (2007) URL (consulted August 2007): http://www.dadsindistress.asn.au/printversion/printversionnews_2005_08.html

15.

Darwin, C. 1859 On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.

16.

Diamond, J. (1993) The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee. London: Vintage.

17.

Edwards, J. (1957) `A Critical Examination of the Reputed Primary Influence of ABO Phenotype on Fertility and Sex Ratio', British Journal of Preventative Medicine 11: 78 - 89.

18.

Field, J. et al. (1995) National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles, 1990 [computer file], SN: 3434. Colchester , Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor].

19.

Gaulin, S. , D. McBurney and S. Brakeman-Wartell (1997) `Matrilateral Biases in the Investment of Aunts and Uncles: A Consequence and Measure of Paternity Uncertainty' , Human Nature 8: 139-51.

20.

Geary, D.C. (2005) `Evolution of Paternal Investment', in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 483-505. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley .

21.

Gilding, M. (2005) `Rampant Misattributed Paternity: The Creation of an Urban Myth', People and Place 13(2): 1-11.

22.

Gilding, M. (2006) `DNA Paternity Tests: A Comparative Analysis of the US and Australia', Health Sociology Review 15(1): 84-95.

23.

GRO (General Register Office Scotland) (1991 ) `Population data - Section 3: births, Table 3.3', URL (consulted October 2008): http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files/01t3_1.xls

24.

GRO (General Register Office Scotland) (2000 ) `Population Data - Section 3: Births, Table 3.3', URL (consulted October 2008): http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/files/01t3_2.xls

25.

Hrdy, S. (2000) `The Optimal Number of Fathers', Annals New York Academy of Sciences 907: 75-96.

26.

International Biosciences (2007) `DNA Paternity Test - A Pandora's Box', URL (consulted October 2008): http://www.ibdna.com/regions/UK/EN/?page=APandorasBox

27.

Jackson, S. and A. Rees (2007) `The Appalling Appeal of Nature: The Popular Influence of Evolutionary Psychology as a Problem for Sociology', Sociology 41(5): 917-30.

28.

Johnson, A. , J. Wadsworth , K. Wellings and J. Field (1994) Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyle. Oxford: Blackwell.

29.

Johnstone, J.M. (1954) `Heterospecific Pregnancy', British Journal of Preventative Social Medicine 8: 117-23.

30.

Kiernan, K. and K. Smith (2003) `Unmarried Parenthood: New Insights from Millennium Cohort Study', Population Trends 114: 26-33.

31.

Lucassen, A. and M. Parker (2001) `Revealing False Paternity: Some Ethical Considerations' , The Lancet 357: 1033-5.

32.

MacIntyre, S. and A. Sooman (1991) `Non-Paternity and Prenatal Genetic Screening' , The Lancet 338: 869-71.

33.

Michael, R.T. , J.H. Gagnon , E.O. Laumann and G. Kolota (1994) Sex in America: A Definitive Study. London: Little, Brown.

34.

NCSR (National Centre for Social Research) ( 2005) National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles II, 2000-2001 [computer file], SN: 5223. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor].

35.

New Scientist (2005) `Paternity Uncertainty Revealed as 1 in 25', URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18725133.700&print=true

36.

ONS (Office for National Statistics) (1991 and 1998) England and Wales Birth Statistics, Series FM 1, No 27, Table 1.1, p. 1. London: Stationery Office.

37.

ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2005 ) England and Wales Birth Statistics, Series FM 1, No 34, Table 1.1, p. 1. London: Stationery Office.

38.

Pinker, S. (2002) The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature . New York: Penguin.

39.

Pinker, S. (2005) `Foreword', in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. xi-xvi. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

40.

Richards, M. (2001) `How Distinctive Is Genetic Information?', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32(4): 663-87.

41.

Ridley, M. (1993) The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature . London: Pan.

42.

Schmitt, D.P. (2005) `Fundamentals of Mating Strategies', in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 258-91. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley .

43.

Shackleford, T.K. , N. Pound , A.T. Goetz and C.W. LaMunyon (2005) `Female Infidelity and Sperm Competition', in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 372-93. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

44.

The Telegraph (2005) `1 in 25 Men in Dark as They Raise Others' Children', URL (consulted March 2007): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/core/Content/displayPrintable.jhtml;jse...QFIQMGSFFAVCBQWIV0?xml=/news/2005/08/11/ndad11.xml&site=5&page=0

45.

Tooby, J. and L. Cosmides (2005) `Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology' , in D.M. Buss (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, pp. 5-67. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

46.

Wostenholme, G. and D. Fitzsimons (eds) (1973) Ciba Foundation Symposium 17: 63, 66.