Women on low incomes are disproportionately represented among sexual violence survivors, yet feminist research on this topic has paid very little attention to social class.This article blends recent research on class, gender and sexuality with what we know about sexual violence. It is argued that there is a need to engage with classed distinctions between women in terms of contexts for and experiences of sexual violence, and to look at interactions between pejorative constructions of working-class sexualities and how complainants and defendants are perceived and treated. The classed division between the sexual and the feminine, drawn via the notion of respectability, is applied to these issues. This piece is intended to catalyse further research and debate, and raises a number of questions for future work on sexual violence and social class.
Anderson, K.L. and D. Umberson (2001) `Gendering Violence: Masculinity and Power in Men's Accounts of Domestic Violence', Gender & Society15(3): 358-80.
2.
Bartky, S.L. (1997) `Foucault, Femininity and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power', in K. Conbody, N. Medina and S. Stanbury (eds) Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory, pp. 129-54. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
Boeringer, S.B. (1999) `Associations of Rape-Supportive Attitudes with Fraternal and Athletic Participation', Violence Against Women5(1): 81-90.
4.
Bourke, J. (2007) Rape: A History from 1860 to the Present. London: Virago Press.
5.
Brownmiller, S. (1975) Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Secker and Warburg.
6.
Bumiller, K. (2008) In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement against Sexual Violence. London: Duke University Press.
7.
Cahill, A.J. (2001) Rethinking Rape. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.
8.
Chilton, L. (2003) `A New Class of Women for the Colonies: The Imperial Colonist and the Construction of Empire', The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History31(2): 36-56.
Davies, M. (1994) `Feminist Appropriations: Law, Property and Personality' , Social & Legal Studies3(3): 365-91.
11.
Davies, M. (1999) `Queer Property, Queer Persons: Self-ownership and Beyond', Social & Legal Studies8(3): 327-52.
12.
Day, S. (1994) `What Counts as Rape? Physical Assault and Broken Contracts: Contrasting Views of Rape among London Sex Workers', in P. Harvey and P. Gow (eds) Sex and Violence: Issues of Representation and Experience , pp. 172-89. London: Routledge.
13.
Day, K., B. Gough and M. McFadden (2003) `Women Who Drink and Fight: A Discourse Analysis of Working-class Women's Talk', Feminism & Psychology13(2): 141-58.
14.
Dworkin, A. (1981) Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women's Press.
15.
Dworkin, A. (1987) Intercourse. London: Secker.
16.
Frohmann, L. (1997) `Convictability and Discordant Locales: Reproducing Race, Class, and Gender Ideologies in Prosecutorial Decisionmaking', Law & Society Review31(3): 531-56.
17.
Halberstam, J. (1998) Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18.
Hall, S. (2002) `Daubing the Drudges of Fury: Men, Violence and the Piety of the "Hegemonic Masculinity" Thesis', Theoretical Criminology6(1): 35-61.
19.
Hanson, R.K. and M.T. Bussiere (1998) `Predicting Relapse: A Meta-analysis of Sexual Offender Recidivism Studies', Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology66(2): 348-62.
20.
Holland, J., C. Ramazanoglu, S. Sharpe and R. Thomson (1998) The Male in the Head: Young People, Heterosexuality and Power. London: The Tufnell Press .
21.
Hollander, J.A. (2001) `Vulnerability and Dangerousness: The Construction of Gender Through Conversation about Violence', Gender & Society15(1): 83-109.
22.
hooks, b. (1981) Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism. London: South End Press.
23.
Humphrey, S.E. and A.S. Kahn (2000) `Fraternities, Athletic Teams, and Rape: Importance of Identification with a Risky Group', Journal of Interpersonal Violence15(12): 1313-22.
24.
Humphreys, C. (2007) `A Health Inequalities Perspective on Violence against Women', Health and Social Care in the Community15(2): 120-7.
25.
Internet Movie Database (2008) The Accused (1988), URL (consulted March 2009): http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094608/
26.
Jackson, S. (2003) `Heterosexuality, Heteronormativity and Gender Hierarchy: Some Reflections on Recent Debates', in J. Weeks, J. Holland and M. Waites (eds) Sexualities and Society: A Reader, pp. 42-58. Cambridge: Polity .
27.
Johnson, H. (2001) `Contrasting Views of the Role of Alcohol in Cases of Wife Assault', Journal of Interpersonal Violence16(1): 54-72.
28.
Johnson, P. (2008) `"Rude Boys": The Homosexual Eroticization of Class' , Sociology42(1): 65-82.
29.
Kelly, L. (1988) Surviving Sexual Violence. Cambridge: Polity.
30.
Kelly, L., J. Temkin and S. Griffiths (2006) Section 41: An Evaluation of New Legislation Limiting Sexual History Evidence in Rape Trials. Home Office Online Report 20/06. London: HMSO.
31.
Larcombe, W. (2002) `The "Ideal" Victim v Successful Rape Complainants: Not What You Might Expect', Feminist Legal Studies10(2): 131-48.
32.
Lees, S. (1996) Carnal Knowledge: Rape on Trial. London: Hamish Hamilton.
33.
Littlejohn, R. (2006) `Spare Us the "People's Prostitute" Routine...' , The Daily Mail, 18 December.
34.
Lockhart, L.L. (1987) `A Re-examination of the Effects of Race and Social Class on the Incidence of Marital Violence: A Search for Reliable Differences' , Journal of Marriage and the Family49(3): 603-10.
35.
MacKinnon, C.A. (1997) `Rape: On Coercion and Consent', in K. Conboy, N. Medina and S. Stanbury (eds) Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York : Columbia University Press.
36.
Marcus, S. (1992) `Fighting Bodies, Fighting Words: A Theory and Politics of Rape Prevention', in J. Butler and J.W. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political, pp. 385-403. London: Routledge.
37.
Messerschmidt, J.W. (1999) `Making Bodies Matter: Adolescent Masculinities, the Body, and Varieties of Violence', Theoretical Criminology3(2): 197-220.
38.
Myhill, A. and J. Allen (2002) Rape and Sexual Assault of Women: The Extent and Nature of the Problem. London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate
39.
Nagel, B., H. Matsuo, K.P. McIntyre and N. Morrison (2005) `Attitudes Towards Victims of Rape: Effects of Gender, Race, Religion, and Social Class', Journal of Interpersonal Violence20(6): 725-37.
40.
Nayak, A. (2006) `Displaced Masculinities: Chavs, Youth and Class in the Post-Industrial City', Sociology40(5): 813-31.
41.
Pain, R.H. (1997) `Social Geographies of Women's Fear of Crime', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers22: 231-44.
42.
Rajah, V. (2007) `Resistance as Edgework in Violent Intimate Relationships of Drug-Involved Women', British Journal of Criminology47(2): 196-213.
43.
Ramazanoglu, C. (1989) Feminism and the Contradictions of Oppression. London: Routledge.
44.
Ramazanoglu, C. and J. Holland (1993) `Women's Sexuality and Men's Appropriation of Desire' , in C. Ramazanoglu (ed.) Up Against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault and Feminism , pp. 239-64. London: Routledge.
45.
Reay, D. (2005) `Beyond Consciousness? The Psychic Landscape of Social Class', Sociology39(5): 911-28.
46.
Richman, K.D. (2002) `Women, Poverty and Domestic Violence: Perceptions of Court and Legal Aid Effectiveness', Sociological Inquiry72(2): 318-44.
47.
Segal, L. (1987) Is the Future Female? Troubled Thoughts on Contemporary Feminism. London: Virago Press.
48.
Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable . London: Sage.
49.
Skeggs, B. (2005) `The Making of Class and Gender through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation', Sociology39(5): 965-82.
50.
Sokoloff, N.J. and I. Dupont (2005) `Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender: Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities', Violence Against Women11(1): 38-64.
51.
Stanko, E.A. (1985) Intimate Intrusions: Women's Experience of Male Violence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
52.
Stevenson, K. (2000) `Unequivocal Victims: The Historical Roots of the Mystification of the Female Complainant in Rape Cases', Feminist Legal Studies8(3): 343-66.
53.
Swan, S.C. and D.L. Snow (2006) `The Development of a Theory of Women's Use of Violence in Intimate Relationships', Violence Against Women12(11): 1026-45.
54.
Temkin, J. (1984) `Regulating Sexual History Evidence - The Limits of Discretionary Legislation', International and Comparative Law Quarterly33: 942-78.
55.
Temkin, J. (2002a) `Digging the Dirt: Disclosure of Records in Sexual Assault Cases', Cambridge Law Journal61(1): 126-45.
56.
Temkin, J. (2002b) Rape and the Legal Process, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
Tombs, J. and E. Jagger (2006) `Denying Responsibility: Sentencers' Accounts of their Decisions to Imprison', British Journal of Criminology46(5): 803-21.
58.
Walklate, S. (2008) `What Is to be Done about Violence against Women?' , British Journal of Criminology48(1): 39-54.
59.
Ward, C.A. (1995) Attitudes toward Rape: Feminist and Social Psychological Perspectives. London: Sage.
60.
Wasco, S.M. (2003) `Conceptualizing the Harm Done by Rape: Applications of Trauma Theory to Experiences of Sexual Assault', Trauma, Violence and Abuse4(4): 309-22.
61.
Westlund, A.C. (1999) `Pre-Modern and Modern Power: Foucault and the Case of Domestic Violence', Signs24(4): 1045-66.
62.
Young, I.M. (1990) `Throwing Like a Girl', in I.M. Young (ed.) Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory, pp. 141-59. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
