Gaming and Performance Metrics in Higher Education: The Consequences of Journal Lists

Abstract

This article analyses ‘gaming’ in higher education as a response to performance metrics. It shows how scholars react to performance measurement systems in the form of journal lists that define appropriate outlets for their research. Two types of gaming are identified: the adaptation of research methods and topics to align with the perceived ideals of top US journals, and strategic networking with editors and potential reviewers before submitting articles to prestigious journals. We employ scripting theory to analyse performance measurement and its consequences, differentiating between three levels of scripting: cultural scripts, represented by journal lists; interactional scripts, characterised by participants’ redefinitions/enactments of these overarching scripts; and intrapsychic scripts, focusing on participants’ self-scripting and personal attitudes towards gaming in academia. The study is based on qualitative interviews with 173 associate and full professors in the social sciences in Denmark.

Keywords

academia gaming higher education journal lists performance metrics scripting theory strategic networking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboubichr

Conway

(2023) The gaming of performance management systems in British universities. Human Relations 76(4): 602–628.

Adler

Harzing

(2009) When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning and Education 8(1): 72–95.

Aguinis

Cummings

Ramani

, et al. (2020) ‘An a is an a’: The new bottom line for valuing academic research. Academy of Management Perspectives 34(1): 135–154.

Argento

van Helden

(2022) Are public sector accounting researchers going through an identity shift due to the increasing importance of journal rankings? Critical Perspectives on Accounting 96: 102537. Available at: https://www-sciencedirect-com-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/science/article/pii/S1045235422001228 (accessed 5 October 2024).

ASA (2018) ASA code of ethics. Available at: www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/asa_code_of_ethics-june2018.pdf (accessed 12 February 2024).

Baccini

Barabesi

Khelfaoui

, et al. (2020) Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies 1(1): 277–289.

Becker

Lukka

(2023) Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 94: 102436. Available at: https://www-sciencedirect-com-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/science/article/pii/S1045235422000211 (accessed 12 February 2024).

Benner

Holmqvist

(ed.) (2023) Universities Under Neoliberalism. Ideologies, Discourses and Management Practices. New York, NY: Routledge.

Biagioli

Kenney

Martin

, et al. (2019) Academic misconduct, misrepresentation and gaming: A reassessment. Research Policy 48(2): 401–413.

10.

Blumer

(1969) Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice.

11.

Boulianne

(2019) US dominance of research on political communication: A meta-view. Political Communication 36(4): 660–665.

12.

Brogaard

Engelberg

Parsons

(2014) Networks and productivity: Causal evidence from editor rotations. Journal of Financial Economics 111(1): 251–270.

13.

Brooks

Schopohl

(2018) Topics and trends in finance research: What is published, who publishes it and what gets cited? British Accounting Review 50(6): 615–637.

14.

Brooks

Schopohl

Walker

(2023) Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 90: 102381.

15.

Bryman

Cassell

(2006) The researcher interview: A reflexive perspective. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 1(1): 41–55.

16.

Butler

Delaney

Spoelstra

(2017) The grey zone: Questionable research practices in the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education 16(1): 94–109.

17.

Colussi

(2018) Social ties in academia: A friend is a treasure. Review of Economics and Statistics 100(1): 45–50.

18.

Erola

Reimer

Räsänen

, et al. (2015) No crisis but methodological separatism: A comparative study of Finnish and Danish publication trends between 1990 and 2009. Sociology 49(2): 374–394.

19.

Espeland

Sauder

(2007) Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40.

20.

Espeland

Sauder

(2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

21.

Fleming

(2021) Dark Academia: How Universities Die. London: Pluto Press.

22.

Gendron

(2008) Constituting the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia. European Accounting Review 17(1): 97–127.

23.

Gendron

Rodrigue

(2021) On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 76: 102076.

24.

Goffman

(1956) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. Social Science Research Centre, monograph no. 2.

25.

Gonzales

Pasque

Farris

, et al. (2024) Epistemic injustice and legitimacy in U.S. doctoral education: A systematic review of literature. Review of Educational Research 94(3): 423–464.

26.

Goyanes

De-Marcos

(2020) Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: A social network analysis of leading journals. Scientometrics 123(2): 791–811.

27.

Graf

Wendler

Stumpf-Wollersheim

, et al. (2019) Wanting more, getting less: Gaming performance measurement as a form of deviant workplace behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 157(3): 753–773.

28.

Gunasekara

(2007) Pivoting the centre: Reflections on undertaking qualitative interviews in academia. Qualitative Research 7(4): 461–475.

29.

Heckman

Moktan

(2020) Publishing and promotion in economics: The tyranny of the top five. Journal of Economic Literature 58(2): 419–470.

30.

Helgesson

Sjögren

(2019) No finish line: How formalization of academic assessment can undermine clarity and increase secrecy. Gender, Work & Organization 26(4): 558–581.

31.

Humphrey

Gendron

(2015) What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26(C): 47–66.

32.

Hussain

(2011) Food for thoughts on the ABS academic journal quality guide. Accounting Education 20(6): 545–559.

33.

Järvinen

Mik-Meyer

(2024) Giving and receiving: Gendered service work in academia. Current Sociology. Epub ahead of print 17 January 2024. DOI: 10.1177/00113921231224754

34.

Kalfa

Wilkinson

Gollan

(2018) The academic game: Compliance and resistance in universities. Work, Employment and Society 32(2): 274–291.

35.

Kallio

K-M

Kallio

Tienari

, et al. (2016) Ethics at stake. Performance management and academic work in universities. Human Relations 69(3): 685–709.

36.

Kwiek

(2019) Social stratification in Higher Education: What it means at the micro-level of the individual academic scientist. Higher Education Quarterly 73(4): 419–444.

37.

Lynch

(2015) Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education 56(2): 190–207.

38.

Macdonald

Kam

(2007) Ring a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Management Studies 44(4): 640–655.

39.

Merton

(1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.

40.

Meyer

Waldkirch

Duscher

, et al. (2018) Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in ‘top’ accounting journals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 51: 22–44.

41.

Mingers

Willmott

(2013) Taylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations 66(88): 1051–1073.

42.

Ministry of Higher Education and Science (2021) The Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Denmark: Ministry of Higher Education and Science.

43.

Nygaard

Piro

Aksnes

(2022) Gendering excellence through research productivity indicators. Gender and Education 34(6): 690–704.

44.

Orupabo

Mangset

(2022) Promoting diversity but striving for excellence. Opening the ‘black box’ of academic hiring. Sociology 56(2): 316–332.

45.

Pelger

Grottge

(2015) What about the future of the academy? Some remarks on the looming colonisation of doctoral students. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 26: 117–129.

46.

Pollitt

(2013) The logics of performance measurement. Evaluation 19(4): 346–363.

47.

Ramassa

Avallone

Quagli

(2023) Can ‘publishing game’ pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers. Journal of Management and Governance 28(2): 507–542.

48.

Rintamäki

Alvesson

(2023) Resisting whilst complying? A case study of a power struggle in a business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education 22(2): 257–273.

49.

Santos

Mendonça

(2022) The small world of innovation studies: An ‘editormetrics’ perspective. Scientometrics 127(12): 7471–7486.

50.

Schwemmer

Wieczorek

(2020) The methodological divide of sociology: Evidence from two decades of journal publications. Sociology 54(1): 3–21.

51.

Simon

Gagnon

(1986) Sexual scripts: Permanence and change. Archives of Sexual Behavior 15(2): 97–120.

52.

Simon

Gagnon

(2003) Sexual scripts: Origins, influences and changes. Qualitative Sociology 26(4): 491–497.

53.

Thomas

(1923) The Unadjusted Girl. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co.

54.

Thomas

(1928) The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. Boston, MA: Knopf.

55.

Tight

(2014) Working in separate silos? What citation patterns reveal about higher education research internationally. Higher Education 68(3): 379–395.

56.

Tourish

Craig

(2020) Research misconduct in business and management studies: Causes, consequences, and possible remedies. Journal of Management Inquiry 29(2): 174–187.

57.

Vanderstraeten

(2020) Scientific communication: Sociology journals and publication practises. Sociology 44(3): 559–576.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.17 MB