Biology and Social Science: A Reply to Ted Benton

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Badcock, C.R. 1990. Oedipus in Evolution. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Benton, T. 1991. `Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed Should be Given a (Cautious) Welcome', Sociology Vol. 25, 1: 1-29.

Daly, M. and Wilson, M. 1983. Sex, Evolution and Behavior (second edition). Boston; PWS.

Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gould, S.J. and Lewontin, R.C. 1979. `The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme'. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 205: 581-598.

Lewontin, R.C. 1979. `Sociobiology as an adaptationist program', Behavioural Science. 24: 5-14.

Reynolds, V. , Falger, V. and Vine, I. (eds.) 1987. The Sociobiology of Ethnocentrism. Beckenham: Croom Helm.

Sahlins, M. 1977. The Use and Abuse of Biology. London: Tavistock.

10.

Shaw, R.P. and Wong, Y. 1989. The Genetic Seeds of Warfare. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

11.

Symons, D. 1979. The Evolution of Human Sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Trivers, R. 1971. `The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism'. Quarterly Review of Biology. 46: 35-57.

13.

Trivers, R. 1974. `Parent-Offspring Conflict'. American Zoologist. 14: 249-264.

14.

Wright, S. 1932. `The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution'. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics. 1: 356-368.

15.

Wright, S. 1980. `Genetic and organismic selection'. Evolution. 34: 825-843.