Processing Sticky Cotton: Effect of Stickiness on Yarn Quality

Abstract

Seventeen cotton samples with small-to-moderate stickiness contamination were created by mixing sticky cottons with non-sticky cottons, and then processed through ring and rotor spinning. Trehalulose contents ranged from 0.002% to 0.034% of the fiber weight (corresponding to 1.8% and 16.8% of the total sugars), while melezitose contents ranged from 0.023% to 0.071% (corresponding to 10.5% and 22.5% of the total sugars). High-speed stickiness detector (H2SD) readings of the card slivers ranged from 2.0 to15.7. At these relatively low levels of contamination there was no correlation between ends-down in spinning and H2SD readings. Results showed that in the short term, less than 12 H2SD spots within a mix of cotton does not seem to influence spinning productivity on either ring (Saco-Lowell SF-3H) or rotor (Rieter R20) systems. A slight, but significant, negative effect on the ring-spun yarn quality was found even at low levels of stickiness. In the long term, it appears likely that even very small amounts of trehalulose slowly contaminate the equipment. This accumulation of sugars would be expected to have a cumulative, negative impact on both productivity and yarn quality.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hequet, E. , and Abidi, N. , Processing Sticky Cotton: Implication of Trehalulose in Residue Build-up , J Cotton Sci 6(1), 77-90 (2002).

Hequet, E. , and Abidi, N. , High Speed Stickiness Detector Measurement: Effect of Temperature Settings and Relative Humidity , J Cotton Sci 6(1), 68-76 (2002).

Hequet, E., and Abidi, N., Cotton Stickiness Evaluation by Means of Multi-temperature Testing, U.S. Patent 6,520,007 B2.

Hequet, E. , and Frydrych, R. , Sticky Cotton from Plant to Yarn. In “New Methods to Test Stickiness in Cotton,” International Cotton Advisory Committee , 1992. p 3-19.

Hendrix, D. L. , Steele, T. L. , and Perkins Jr, H. H. , Bemisia honeydew and sticky cotton. In “Bemisia: Taxonomy, Biology, Damage, Control and Management,” D. Gerling and R. T. Mayer , Eds, Intercept, Andover, UK , 1995, pp. 189-199.

Hendrix, D. L. , Wei, Y.-A. , and Legett, J. E. , Homopteran honeydew sugar composition is determined by both the insect and the plant species , Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1001B(1/2), 33-27 (1992).

Sisman, S. , and Schenek. A. , Bremen honeydew test-new method for testing the sticky tendency of cotton , Melliand Textilberichte 13, 593-595 (1984).

Strolz, H. M , ITMF Cotton Contamination Survey 2001 . In 26th International Cotton Conference, Bremen, 13-16 March, pp. 35-39 , 2002.

Tarczynski, M. C. , Byrne, D. N. , and Miller, W. B. , High performance liquid chromatography analysis of carbohydrates of cotton-phloem sap and honeydew produced by Bemisia tabaci feeding on cotton , Plant Physiol. 98, 753-756 (1992).