Predicting the Handle and Comfort of Military Clothing Fabrics from Sensory and Instrumental Data: Development and Application of New Psychophysical Methods
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2003
Predicting the Handle and Comfort of Military Clothing Fabrics from Sensory and Instrumental Data: Development and Application of New Psychophysical Methods
Sensory and instrumental fabric characteristics that contribute to military clothing comfort are analyzed in a series of studies. A standardized hand evaluation methodology is checked for its sensitivity and reliability and used to characterize thirteen military fabrics. A labeled magnitude scale of comfort is developed using consumer magnitude estimates of the semantic meaning of verbal phrases denoting different levels of comfort/ discomfort. The sensitivity and reliability of this "CALM" scale is assessed in two studies, and the scale is then used by consumers to rate the handle and comfort of the thirteen test fabrics. The descriptive sensory data and comfort data are combined with Kawabata data obtained on a subset of the fabrics, and the data are analyzed with a principal components analysis. Multiple regression analyses are performed using the component scores to predict consumer comfort from the sensory and instrumental data. The results show a high degree of predictability of comfort responses from a combination of sensory and Kawa bata parameters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ali, S.I., and Begum, S., Fabric Softeners and Softness Perception, Ergonomics37 (5). 801-806 (1994).
2.
Baird, J.C., and Harder. K.A., The Psychophysics of Imagery, Percept. Psyclrophys.62 (1), 113-126 (2000).
3.
Binns, H., TheDiscrimination of Wool Fabrics by the Sense Touch, Br. J. Psychol.16, 237-247 (1926).
4.
Borg, G., A Category Scale with Ratio Properties for Intermodal and Interindividual Comparisons, in "Psychophysical Judgment and the Process of Perception," H-G. Geissler, and P. Petxoid , Eds., VEB Deutxcher Veriag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1982, pp. 25-34.
Brandt, M.A. , Skinner, E.Z., and Coleman, J.A., Texture Profile Method, J. Food Sci.28, 404-409 (1963).
7.
Branson, D.H., and Sweeney, M., Conceptualization and Measurement of Clothing Comfort: Toward a Metatheory, in "Critical Linkages in Textiles and Clothing: Theory, Method and Practice ," S. Kaiser and M. L. Damhorst, Eds., International Textile and Apparel Association, Monument, CO, 1991, pp. 94-105.
8.
Burgard, D.R., and Kuznicki, J.T., "Chemometrics: Chemical and Sensory Data," CRC Press , Boca Raton, FL, 1990.
9.
Bums, L.D., Brown, D.M., Cameron, B., Chandler, J., Dallas, M.J., and Kaiser, S.B., Sensory Interaction and Descriptions of Fabric Hand, Percept. Mot. Skills81, 120-122 ( 1995).
10.
Civille, G.V. , and Dus, C.A., Development of Terminology to Describe the Handfeel Properties of Paper and Fabrics, J. Sens. Stud . 5, 19-32 (1990).
11.
Elder, H.M. , Fisher, S., Armstrong , K., and Hutchinson , G., Fabric Softness, Handle and Compression. J. Textile Inst.75, 37-46 ( 1984).
12.
Elder, H.M. , Fisher, S., Armstrong , K., and Hutchinson. G., Fabric Stiffness, Handle and Flexion, J. Textile Inst.75, 99-106 (1984).
13.
Fourt, L., and Hollies, N.R.S., "Clothing: Comfort and Function," Marcel Dekker , NY, 1970.
14.
Gagge, A.P. , Stolwijk, J.A.J., and Hardy, J.D., Comfort and Thermal Sensations and Associated Physiological Responses at Various Ambient Temperatures, Environ. Res. I, 1-20 (1967).
15.
Green, B.G. , Dalton, P., Cowart , B., Shaffer, G., Rankin, K., and Higgins, J., Evaluating the "Labeled Magnitude Scale" for Measuring Sensations of Taste and Smell, Chem. Senses21 (3), 323-335 (1996).
16.
Green, B.G. , Shaffer, G.S., and Gilmore, M.M., Derivation and Evaluation of a Semantic Scale of Oral Sensation Magnitude with Apparent Ratio Properties, Chem. Senses18, 683-702 (1993).
17.
Gridgeman, N.T., A Comparison of Some Test Methods, J. Food Sci.26, 171-177 (1961).
18.
Guilford, J.P. , and Dingman, H.F., A Modification of the Method of Equal-appearing Intervals, Am. J. Psychol.68, 450-454 (1955).
19.
Gwosdow, A.R. , Stevens, J.C., Berglund , L.G., and Stolwijk , J.A.J., Skin Friction andFabric Sensations in Neutral and Warm Environments, Textile Res. J.56 (9), 574-580 (1986).
20.
Hollies, N.R. , Investigation of the Factors Influencing Comfort in Cotton Apparel Fabrics, Contract 12-14-100-7183 (72), US Dept. of Agriculture, New Orleans, (referenced in Hollies et al., 1979), 1965.
21.
Hollies, N.R. , Custer, A.G., Morin , C.J., and Howard, M.E., A Human Perception Analysis Approach to Clothing Comfort, Textile Res. J.49, 557-564 (1979).
22.
Houghton, F.C. , and Yaglou, C.P., Determining Lines of Equal Comfort , ASHRAE Trans. 28, 163-176, 361-384 (1923).
23.
Jones, L.V. , Peryam, D.R., and Thurstone , L.L., Development of a Scale for Measuring Soldiers' Food Preferences, Food Res.20, 512-520 (1955).
24.
Kawabata, S., "Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation," 2nd ed., The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, 1980.
25.
Kawabata, S. , and Niwa, M., Analysis of Hand Evaluation of Wool Fabrics for Men's Suits Using Data of a Thousand Samples and Computation of Hand from the Physical Properties, in "Proc. 5th Int. WoolTextile Research Conference," vol. 5, 1975, pp. 413-424.
26.
Kawabata, S., Postle, R., and Niwa, M., Eds. "Objective Specification of Fabric Quality, Mechanical Properties and Performance," The Textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka, 1982.
27.
Lane, H.L., Catania, A.C., and Stevens, S.S., Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness and Effect of Side Tone, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.33, 160-167 (1961).
28.
Laughlin, J. , Perception of Texture. Visually and Tactually: An Exploratory Study Using Multidimensional Scaling Analysis, Int. J. Cloth . Sci. Technol.3 (1), 28-36 (1991).
29.
Mackay, C., Effect of Laundering on the Sensory and Mechanical Properties of 1 × 1 Rib Knitwear Fabrics, Masters thesis, Bolton Institute of Higher Education, Bolton, England, p. 63, 1992.
30.
Marks, L.E. , and Gonzales, R.R., Skin Temperature Modifies the Pleasantness of Thermal Stumuli, Nature247 (5441), 473-475 (1974).
Parducci, A. , Contextual Effects: A Range-Frequency Analysis, in "Handbook of perception " vol. 3, E. C. Carterette and M. P. Friedman, Eds., Academic Press, 1974 .
33.
Pierce, F.T. , The "Handle" of Cloth as a Measurable Quantity, J. Textile Inst.21, T377-416 (1930).
34.
Pontrelli, G.J. , Partial Analysis of Comfort's Gestalt, in "Clothing Comfort: Interaction of Thermal. Ventilation, Construction and Assessment Factors," N. R. S. Hollies and R. F. Goldman, Eds., Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 1977, pp. 71-80.
35.
Riskey, D.R. , Uses and Abuses of Category Scales in Sensory Measurement, J. Sens. Stud. 1, 217-236 (1986).
36.
Robinson, K.J. , Chambers, E., and Gatewood, B.M., Influence of Pattern Design and Fabric Type on the Hand Characteristics of Pigment Prints , Textile Res. J.67 (11), 837-845 (1997).
37.
Robinson, K.J. , Gatewood, B.M., and Chambers , E., Influence of Domestic Fabric Softeners on the Appearance, Soil Release, Absorbency, and Hand of Cotton Fabrics, in "Book of Papers, 1994 International Conference and Exhibition ," American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists , Charlotte, NC, 1994 , pp. 58-66.
38.
Rohles, F.H., Comfort and the Man-Environment System, in " Proc. Clothing and Energy Resources Workshop", Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. 1978 , pp. 22-35.
Schutz, H.G. , and Cardello, A.V., A Labeled Affective Magnitude (LAM) Scale for Assessing Food Liking/Disliking , J. Sens. Stud.16, 117-159 (2001).
41.
Schwartz, N.O. , Adaptation of the Sensory Texture Profile Method to Skin Care Products, J. Texture Stud. 6, 33-42 ( 1975 ).
42.
Slater, K., ComfortProperties of Textiles , Textile Prog.9, 1-71 (1977).
43.
Slater, K., "Human Comfort," Charles C. Thomas, Spring-field, IL, 1985.
44.
Sontag, M.S. , ComfortDimensions of Actual and Ideal Insulative Clothing for Older Women, Cloth . Textile Res. J.4, 9-17 (1985- 1986).
45.
Stevens, J.C. . A Comparison of Ratio Scales for the Loudness of White Noise and the Brightness of White Light, Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1957.
46.
Stevens, J.C. , Aging and SpatialAcuity of Touch, J. Gerontol.47 (1) 35-40 ( 1992).
47.
Stevens, S.S. , On the Psychophysical Law, Psychol. Rev.64, 153 (1957).
Stevens, S.S. , and Galanter, E.H., Ratio Scales and I Category Scales for a Dozen Perceptual Continua, J. Exp. Psychol.54, 377-411 (1957).
50.
Sweeney, M.M. , and Branson, D.H., Sensorial Comfort , Part II: A Magnitude Estimation Approach for Assessing Moisture Sensation, Textile Res. J.60, 477-452 (1990).
51.
Vaughn, E.A. and Kim, C.J., Definition andAssessment of Fabric Hand, in "Book of Papers. AATCC Conference ," American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists , Research Triangle Park, NC, 1975 , pp. 66-77.
52.
West, R.L., Ward, L.M., and Khosla, R., Constrained Scaling—The Effect of Learned Psychophysical Scales on the Idiosyncratic Response Bias, Percept. Psychophys.62 (1), 137-151 (2000).
53.
Winakor, G. , Kim, C.J., and Wolins, L., Fabric Hand: Tactile Sensory Assessment. Textile Res. J.50, 601-610 (1980).
54.
Winslow, C-E. A., Herrington, L.P. and Gagge, A.P., Physiological Reactions of the Human Body to Varying Environmental Temperature, Am. J. Physiol. 120, 1-20 (1937).
55.
Winslow, C-E. A., Herriagton, L.P., and Gagge. A.P., Relations Between Atmospheric Conditions. Physiological Reactions and Sensations of Pleasantness . Am. J. Hyg. 26, 103-115 (1937).
56.
Yick, K.L.Cheng. K.P.S., and How. Y.L., Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Men's Shirting Fabrics, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 7 (4), 17-29 (1995).
