In this replicated experiment, we investigated the impact of cashmere on blends with superfine wools on the quality of tops, rovings, and worsted spun yarns. We also investigated the relative performance of soft, low crimp/low fiber curvature superfine wool when compared with cashmere and also when compared with traditional high crimp/high fiber curvature superfine wool in pure and blended yarns. The results indicate both the cashmere blend ratio and fiber curvature/crimp of wool affected processing requirements and the attributes of worsted pure and blended tops, rovings, and yarns. Adding wool to cashmere improved the processing of cashmere roving and reduced yarn faults. Mean fiber curvature was a good predictor of yarn hairiness and yarn tenacity.
Hand Evaluation and Standardization Committee, “ Standard of Hand Evaluation of Men's Winter Suiting”, Vol. 3. S. Kawabata (ed), Textile Machinery Society Japan, Osaka, 1982.
2.
McGregor, B.A., “ The Quality of Cashmere and its Influence on Textile Materials Produced from Cashmere and Blends with Superfine Wool”, PhD Thesis, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2001.
3.
McGregor, B.A., Quality Attributes of Cashmere, in “Proceedings of the 10th International Wool Textile Research Conference, Aachen”, 2000, pp. SF1—10.
4.
McGregor, B.A. , Clean Fiber, Vegetable Matter, Wax, Suint and Ash Content, Yield and Fiber Attributes of Commercial Lots of Australian Cashmere , Int. J. Sheep and Wool Sci., 51, 224—241 (2003).
5.
McGregor, B.A. , and Postle, R., Single Yarn Knitted Fabrics Produced from Low and High Curvature Superfine Merino Wool, Int. J. Sheep and WoolSci., 50, 691—697 (2002).
6.
McGregor, B.A. , and Postle, R., Processing and Quality of Cashmere Tops for Ultra-Fine Wool Worsted Blend Fabrics, Int. J. Clothing Sci. Tech., 16, 119—131 (2004).
7.
Wang, X., Chang, L., and McGregor, B., The Hairiness of Worsted Wool and Cashmere Yarns and the Impact of Fiber Curvature on Hairiness, Textile Res. J., 76, 281—287 (2006).
8.
Kurdo, K.O.A. , Whitely, K.J., and Smith, L.J., The Influence of Resistance to Compression on the Processing Performance of Superfine Wools, Part 1: Topmaking, J. Textile Inst., 77, 104—118 ( 1986).
9.
Stevens, D., and Mahar, T., The Beneficial Effects of Low Fiber Crimp in Worsted Processing and on Fabric Properties and Fabric Handle, in “Proceedings of the 9th International Wool Textile Research Conference”, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 134—142.
10.
Lamb, P.R., Purvis, I.W., and Robinson, G.A., Processing Implications of Finer, Longer, Lower Crimp Wool, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 13, 16—19 (2000).
11.
Haigh, M.G. and Robinson, G.A., The Effect of Fiber Attributes on Fabric Properties, Int. J. Sheep and WoolSci., 50, 664—670 (2002).
12.
Smith, J.L. , Purvis, I.W., and Haigh, M.G., CrimpFrequency Effects on Processing Performance of Superfine Wool when Staple Length is Held Constant, Int. J. Sheep and WoolSci., 53(2), 1—20 (2005).
13.
Hunter, L., Kawabata, S., Gee, E., and Niwa, M., The Effect of Wool Fiber Diameter and Crimp on the Objectively Measured Handle of Woven Fabrics, in “Proceedings of the Joint Japan—Australian Symposium on Objective Specification of Fabric Quality, Mechanical Properties and Performance, Kyoto, Japan”, Kawabata, S., Postle, R. , and Niwa, M. (eds), Textile Machinery Society Japan, Osaka, 1982, pp. 167—182.
14.
Hunter, L., Smuts, S., and Gee, E., The Role of Sheep Breed in determining the Relationship between Wool Fiber Properties and Worsted Yarn and Fabric Properties, in “Proceedings of the 7th International Wool Textile Research Conference ”, Vol. 2, 1985, pp. 11—25.
15.
McGregor, B.A. , and Toland, P.C., Fiber-curvature andStaple-length Relationships in a Low Staple-crimp-frequency, Fine-wool Merino Flock, Int. J. Sheep and WoolSci., 50, 819— 825 (2002).
16.
Haigh, M.G., Superfine Wool Processing, in “Proceedings of Top-Tech 96”, CSIRO, Geelong , 1996, pp. 234—257.
17.
Martindale, J.G., A New Method of Measuring the Irregularity of Yarns with some Observations on the Origin of Irregularities in Worsted Slivers and Yarns, J. Textile Inst., 36, T35— T47 (1945).
18.
Payne, R. W. (ed), “ The Guide to GenStat®”, Release8, Part 2: Statistics, Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted, UK, 2005.
19.
Whiteley, K.J. , Welshman, S.J., Stanton, J.H., and Pattinson , R., Observations on the Characteristics of Australian Greasy Wool, Part VI: The Resistance to Compression of Merino Fleece Wools, J. Textile Inst., 77, 1—8 (1986).
20.
Woods, J.H. , CrimpForms in Merino Wool Fibers: 1 — Descriptive, J. Textile Inst., 26, T93—T102 (1935).
21.
Prins, M.W., and Robinson, G.A., Neps in Worsted Processing, in “Proceedings of Top-Tech 96”, CSIRO, Geelong , 1996, pp. 196—207.
22.
Robinson, G., “ Ultrafine Wool Processing”, Research and Extension Video-conference Lecture No 3, 24/9/98, Co-operative Research Centre Premium Quality Wool, Armidale, 1998.
23.
Menkart, J. , and Detenbeck, J.C., The Significance of Wool Fiber Crimp, Part 1: A Study on the Worsted System, Textile Res. J., 26, 665—689 (1957).
24.
Hunter, L., Turpie, D.W.F., and Gee, E., Effect of Wool Fiber Properties on Worsted Processing Performance and on Yarn and Fabric Properties, in “Proceedings of the 1st World Merino Conference, Melbourne”, 1982, pp. 109—133.
25.
Wuliji, T., Endo, T., Land, J.T.J., Andrews, R.N., Dodds, K.G., and Turner, P.R., Evaluation of New Zealand Low and High Crimp Merino Wools: Part 11, Wool Characteristics and Processing Performance of Knitwear and Woven Fabrics, in “Proceedings of the 9th International Wool Textile Research Conference ”, Vol. 2, 1995, pp. 150—158.
26.
Lamb, P.R., Robinson, G.A., and Mahar, T.J., The Effect of Fiber Crimp on Yarn Evenness and Spinning Performance, in “Proceedings of Top-Tech 96”, CSIRO, Geelong, 1996, pp. 324—331.
27.
Lobb, J.T., Hansford, K.A., Humphries, W., Lamb, P.R., and Yang, S., “ A Preliminary Study of Fiber Curvature Measurement using Sirolan-Laserscan and its Potential Applications”, Report No. 8, Boston , International Wool Textile Organisation, Ilkley, Yorkshire, UK, 1997.
28.
Schreiber, O.H. , Production of Fine-quality Recombed Worsted Yarns, Melliand Textilberichte,78, 478—481 (Engl. Transl. E99—E101) (1997).
Hunter, L., The Effects of Wool Fiber Properties on Processing Performance and Yarn and Fabric Properties, in “Proceedings of the 6th International Wool Textile Research Conference”, Vol. 1, 1980, pp. 133—193.
