This research aimed to reduce fabric frictional noise to enhance wearing comfort, as such noise can be bothersome. This goal was achieved through chemical surface treatments, specifically cross-linker treatment and silicone softener treatment. Frictional noise from the treated fabrics was generated, recorded, and analyzed using a frictional noise generator, fast Fourier transform, and sixth-band analysis to determine the total noise level. A novel aspect of this work is the use of psychoacoustic characterization to evaluate the fabric frictional noise by calculating Zwicker’s parameters using the Brüel and Kjær application. In addition, the mechanical properties were tested using the Kawabata compression and surface testers, with data comparison achieved using Student’s t-test. The results showed that softeners are more effective than cross-linkers in reducing the total frictional noise level, loudness, and fluctuation strength. However, cross-linkers are better at reducing sharpness. Neither treatment affected the roughness of the frictional noise. In summary, both easy-care and softener treatments help reduce discomfort and produce less loud and sharp fabric frictional noise.
NaYChoG.Variations in sensibility to fabric frictional sound by fiber type and subject. Text Res J2003;
73(9): 837–842. doi:10.1177/004051750307300915
2.
LeeKChoG.The optimum coating condition by response surface methodology for maximizing vapor-permeable water resistance and minimizing frictional sound of combat uniform fabric. Text Res J2014;
84(7): 684–693. doi:10.1177/0040517513509870
3.
CoulombCA.Théorie des Machines Simples. Mémoire de Mathématiques et de Physique de l’académie royale des Sciences.
Paris:
Hachette Livre, 1781.
4.
BowdenFPTaborD.The Friction and Lubrication of Solids.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1950.
5.
LeclincheFAdolpheDCDreanESchacherLZimpferV.Modeling of wear sound production based on mechanical and friction properties of woven fabric. Text Res J2019;
89(13): 2511–2521.
6.
YiEChoG.Fabric sound parameters and their relationship with mechanical properties. Text Res J2000;
70(9): 828–836.
7.
ArshiAJeddiAAKatbabA.Frictional behavior of plain woven fabrics constructed from polyester and cotton yarns in different environmental conditions. J Eng Fibers Fabrics2012;
7(2). doi:10.1177/155892501200700215
8.
AjayiJO.Effects of fabric structure on frictional properties. Text Res J1992;
62(2): 87–93. doi:10.1177/004051759206200205
9.
YosoufKLatrochHSchacherLAdolpheDDreanEZimpferV.Frictional sound analysis by simulating the human arm movement. Autex Res J2017;
17(1): 12–19.
10.
YiEChoGNaYCasaliJG.A fabric sound evaluation system for totally auditory-sensible textiles. Text Res J2002;
72(7): 638–644
11.
ThorsenWJ.The spectral distribution of sound produced by fibers and fabrics in friction: Part II: Variations with fabric hand, fuzziness, wrinkledness, and textile mechanical and finishing processes. Text Res J1962;
32(8): 670–676. doi:10.1177/004051756203200809
12.
SchwarzER.Technical evaluation of textile finishing treatments. Text Res1939;
9(6): 216–223. doi:10.1177/004051753900900603
13.
BhatNNetravaliAGoreASathianarayananMArolkarGDeshmukhR.Surface modification of cotton fabrics using plasma technology. Text Res J2011;
81(10): 1014–1026. doi:10.1177/0040517510397574
14.
YangYParkM-RChoG.Relationship between frictional sounds and mechanical properties of vapor permeable water repellent fabrics for active wear. J Kor Soc Cloth Ind2008;
10(4): 566–571.
15.
KimILeeKChoG.Response surface methodology for optimizing treatment condition of military combat uniform fabrics with phase change microcapsules to minimize fabric frictional sound and maximize the heat property. Fibers Polym2016;
17(8): 1305‑1310.
16.
YangYKimCParkJYouHChoG.Application of the real fabric frictional speeds to the fabric sound analysis using water repellent fabrics. Fibers Polym2009;
10(4): 557‑561.
17.
LeeEHanSHyunLKChoG.Comparison between fabric frictional sound parameters and wearers’ subjective auditory sensibility of PCM-treated combat uniforms. Fibers Polym2015;
16(6): 1410‑1416.
ChoJChoG.Determining the psychoacoustic parameters that affect subjective sensation of fabric sounds at given sound pressures. Text Res J2007;
77(1): 29–37.
20.
ChoSChoG.Minimizing frictional sound of PU-Nanoweb and PTFE film laminated vapor permeable water repellent fabrics. Fibers Polym2012;
13: 123‑129.
21.
FrickJGAndrewsBAKReidJD.Effects of cross-linkage in wrinkle-resistant cotton fabrics. Text Res J1960;
30(7): 495–504.
22.
TangKPFanJTZhangJFSarkarMKKanCW.Effect of softeners and crosslinking conditions on the performance of easy-care cotton fabrics with different weave constructions. Fibers Polym2013;
14(5): 822‑831.
23.
KamruzzamanMEman TalukderMManikandanNForhad HossainMAsaduzzamanMuhammad.DMDHEU, concentration of the cross linking agent, pad-dry-cure technique, DP rating, crease recovery angle. Int J Text Sci2016;
5(4): 74–81.
24.
YosoufKLatrochHSchacherLAdolpheDDreanEZimpferV.Frictional sound analysis by simulating the human arm movement. Autex Res J2017;
17(1): 12–19.
25.
KawabataS.The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation.
The Textile Machinery Society Japan, 1980.
26.
ISO E. 139: 2005 textiles—Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing.
Paris:
ISO, 2005
27.
ZwickerEFastlHWidmannUKurakataKKuwanoSNambaS.Program for calculating loudness according to DIN 45631 (ISO 532B). J Acoust Soc Japan E1991;
12(1): 39‑42.
28.
ChoudhuryAKR.Principles of Textile Finishing.
New Delhi:
Woodhead, 2017.
29.
TalebpourF.Effects of silicone-based softener on the easy-care finished cotton fabric. Ind J Fibre Text Res2006;
31(3): 444‑449.
30.
LeclincheFDreanEAdolpheDZimpferV.Sensory analysis of fabric friction noise: Methodology, training, and validation of a panel to evaluate fabric friction noise perception. J Sens Stud2023;
38(3): e12825. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12825
31.
ThongsoumeF.Contribution à l’évaluation tactile des produits textiles par analyse sensorielle. PhD Thesis, Mulhouse, 2002. Available at: http://www.theses.fr/2002MULH0709 (accessed September 2024).
