Mechanical optimization of a rehabilitation harness via an integrated Abaqus-ISIGHT framework: A multidisciplinary approach for enhanced biomechanical performance
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Mechanical optimization of a rehabilitation harness via an integrated Abaqus-ISIGHT framework: A multidisciplinary approach for enhanced biomechanical performance
Medical-device-related pressure injuries resulting from mismatched human–harness interfaces during body weight support (BWS) training represent a persistent challenge in clinical rehabilitation. This study investigates a multidisciplinary cosimulation framework integrating finite-element analysis (FEA) and optimization algorithms to enhance the biomechanical compatibility of harness systems. An automated multisoftware optimization workflow was developed to minimize stress and strain induced by the harness, with the objective function targeting optimal pressure distribution across the body–harness interface. Subsequently, inverse parameter identification was performed to derive the optimal material properties of the harness. Simulation results revealed that the optimized harness configuration significantly reduced peak von Mises stress by 15.47% ± 1.2% and maximum shear strain by 19.58% ± 0.9% compared with conventional designs. Furthermore, a region-specific material optimization strategy was implemented: stiffer, warp-dominant materials were employed in the lumbar region to enhance load-bearing performance, while softer materials with lower warp and weft stiffness were applied to the shoulders and legs to redistribute mechanical loads and reduce localized tissue deformation. These findings provide a biomechanically informed design strategy that effectively mitigates the risk of pressure injuries during BWS training, contributing to safer and more comfortable rehabilitation harness systems.
PowellESLopezJWestgatePMHinesESawakiL.Effects of dynamic overground body weight support training during inpatient rehabilitation after traumatic spinal cord injury: A retrospective case series. Amer J Phys Med Rehab2022;
101(2): 196–200. DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001828.
2.
BannwartMBayerSLIgnasiakNKBolligerMRauterGEasthopeCA.Mediolateral damping of an overhead body weight support system assists stability during treadmill walking. J Neuroeng Rehab2020;
17(1): 108. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00735-w.
3.
EttemaSPenninkGHBuurkeTJWDavidSvan BennekomCAMHoudijkH.Clinical indications and protocol considerations for selecting initial body weight support levels in gait rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehab2024;
21(1): 97. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01389-8.
4.
HadidAGozesGAtoonAGefenAEpsteinY.Effects of an improved biomechanical backpack strap design on load transfer to the shoulder soft tissues. J Biomech2018;
76: 45–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.016.
5.
BorggraefeIKlaiberMSchulerT, et al.
Safety of robotic-assisted treadmill therapy in children and adolescents with gait impairment: A bi-centre survey. Development Neurorehab2010;
13(2): 114–119. DOI: 10.3109/17518420903321767.
PlooijMApteSKellerU, et al.
Neglected physical human–robot interaction may explain variable outcomes in gait neurorehabilitation research. Science Robotics2021;
6(58): eabf1888. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.abf1888.
8.
VargheseNThilagavathiG.Handle, fit and pressure comfort of silk/hybrid yarn woven stretch fabrics. Fibers Polym2016;
17(3): 484–494. DOI: 10.1007/s12221-016-5561-5.
9.
KanaiHOgawaKSasagawaTShibataK.Influence of the mechanical stretch property of fabrics on the wear comfort of men’s suit pants. Text Res J2021;
91(23–24): 2771–2785. DOI: 10.1177/00405175211019131.
10.
VargheseNThilagavathiG.Development of woven stretch fabrics and analysis on handle, stretch, and pressure comfort. J Text Inst2015;
106(3): 242–252. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2014.914652.
11.
TianBXuZHuS.Evaluation of dress fit based on CLO3D virtual fitting technique. J Donghua Univ Nat Sci Ed2018;
44(3): 397–402.
12.
HuJSongY.Research on the dressing effect evaluation of Qipao based on CLO3D virtual fitting technology. J Silk2021;
58(12): 73–79.
13.
YounSZhanSMathurK.Advanced virtual fit technology for precision pressure application in medical compression waistbands. Appl Sci Basel2024;
14(22): 10697. DOI: 10.3390/app142210697.
14.
TianFYangCZhangERSunDHShiWDChenYH.Design optimization of hydraulic machinery based on iSIGHT software: A review of methods and applications. Water2023;
15(11): 2100. DOI: 10.3390/w15112100.
15.
BaszczynskiK.Effects of safety harnesses protecting against falls from a height on the user’s body in suspension. Int J Environ Res Public Health2023;
20(1): 71. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010071.
16.
CiacciaFSznelwarLI.An approach to aircraft seat comfort using interface pressure mapping. Work2012;
41: 240–245. DOI: 10.3233/wor-2012-0163-240.
17.
MitsunoTKaiA.Distribution of the preferred clothing pressure over the whole body. Text Res J2019;
89(11): 2187–2198. DOI: 10.1177/0040517518786272.
18.
KermavnarTO’SullivanKJCaseyVde EytoAO’SullivanLW.Circumferential tissue compression at the lower limb during walking, and its effect on discomfort, pain and tissue oxygenation: Application to soft exoskeleton design. Appl Ergonom2020;
86: 103093. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103093.
HadidABelzerNShabshinNZeiligGGefenAEpsteinY.The effect of mechanical strains in soft tissues of the shoulder during load carriage. J Biomech2015;
48(15): 4160–4165. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.020.
21.
LubozVBailetMGrivotCB, et al.
Personalized modeling for real-time pressure ulcer prevention in sitting posture. J Tissue Viabil2018;
27(1): 54–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.06.002.
22.
HuangSXHuangL.CLO3D-based 3D virtual fitting technology of down jacket and simulation research on dynamic effect of cloth. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput2022;
2022: 5835026. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5835026.
23.
TakaiATeramaeTNodaT, et al.
Development of split-force-controlled body weight support (SF-BWS) robot for gait rehabilitation. Front Human Neurosci2023;
17: 1197380. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1197380.
24.
LungCWYangTDLiauBYCheungWCJainSJanYK.Dynamic changes in seating pressure gradient in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technol2020;
32(5): 277–286. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2018.1546781.
25.
DuCFYangNGuoJCHuangYPZhangCQ.Biomechanical response of lumbar facet joints under follower preload: A finite element study. BMC Musculoskel Disord2016;
17. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0980-4.
26.
McGillSMKavcicNSHarveyE.Sitting on a chair or an exercise ball: Various perspectives to guide decision making. Clin Biomech2006;
21(4): 353–360. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.11.006.
27.
WuXRakhejaSBoileauPE.Study of human-seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration. Int J Ind Ergonom1998;
21(6): 433–449. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(96)00084-4.
28.
HiraoANaitoSYamazakiN.Pressure sensitivity of buttock and thigh as a key factor for understanding of sitting comfort. Appl Sci Basel2022;
12(15): 7363. DOI: 10.3390/app12157363.
29.
ZhangQFanJHGaoCB.CRITID: Enhancing CRITIC with advanced independence testing for robust multi-criteria decision-making. Sci Rep2024;
14(1): 25094. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75992-z.
30.
ZhaoMQWangXLYuJXueLLYangS.A construction schedule robustness measure based on improved prospect theory and the Copula-CRITIC method. Appl Sci Basel2020;
10(6): 2013. DOI: 10.3390/app10062013.
31.
YuLPYangWHDuanYLLongXW.A study on the application of coordinated TOPSIS in evaluation of robotics academic journals. Math Prob Eng2018;
2018: 5456064. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5456064.
32.
HedrichCMMorbachHReiserCGirschickHJ.New insights into adult and paediatric chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis CNO. Curr Rheumatol Rep2020;
22(9): 52. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-020-00928-1.
33.
FallahnezhadKO’RourkeDBahlJSThewlisDTaylorM.The role of muscle forces and gait cycle discretization when assessing acetabular cup primary stability: A finite element study. Comput Meth Programs Biomed2023;
230: 107351. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107351.
34.
BayraktarHHMorganEFNieburGLMorrisGEWongEKKeavenyTM.Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. J Biomech2004;
37(1): 27–35. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00257-4.
35.
FilgueirasERebeloF (eds.). Evaluation of concepts for lumbar support in harness. In: 6th International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene (SHO 2010), Guimaraes, Portugal, 2010, vol. 2, pp. 11–12.
36.
SepehrPJabbariMNaeiniHS, et al.
Design and psychometric analysis of the safety harness usability and comfort assessment tool (SH UCAT). Heliyon2023;
9(2): e13524. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13524.
37.
HuangJJZhengLXMeiQ.Design and optimization method of a two-disk rotor system. Int J Turbo Jet-Engines2016;
33(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.1515/tjj-2014-0033.
38.
SuYKluessDMittelmeierWvan RienenUBaderR.An automatic approach for calibrating dielectric bone properties by combining finite-element and optimization software tools. Comput Meth Biomech Biomed Eng2016;
19(12): 1306–1313. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1131980.
39.
LuTYShenHSWangHChenXHFengML.Optimization design and nonlinear bending of bio-inspired helicoidal composite laminated plates. Materials2023;
16(13): 4550. DOI: 10.3390/ma16134550.
40.
YeFLShiDWXuCLiKYLinMYShiGL.Noninvasive reconstruction of internal heat source in biological tissue using adaptive simulated annealing algorithm. Sci Rep2024;
14(1): 16379. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67253-w.
41.
NamYYangSMKimJKooBSongSHKimY.Quantification of comfort for the development of binding parts in a standing rehabilitation robot. Sensors2023;
23(4): 2206. DOI: 10.3390/s23042206.
42.
WangSTWangXHWangYY.Effects of clothing ease and body postures on the air gap and clothing coverage. Int J Cloth Sci Technol2019;
31(4): 578–594. DOI: 10.1108/ijcst-12-2018-0158.
43.
MousazadeganFEzazshahabiN.Contribution of constituent yarns of the worsted woven fabrics in various directions during the tensile loading. J Eng Fibers Fabrics2019;
14: 1–10. DOI: 10.1177/1558925019846694.
44.
BabyRMathurKDenHartogE.nondestructive quantitative evaluation of yarns and fabrics and determination of contact area of fabrics using the x-ray microcomputed tomography system for skin-textile friction analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interf2021;
13(3): 4652–4664. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c18300.
45.
DerlerSRaoABallistreriPHuberRScheel-SailerARossiRM.Medical textiles with low friction for decubitus prevention. Tribol Int2012;
46(1): 208–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.03.011.
46.
RotaruGMPilleDLehmeierFK, et al.
Friction between human skin and medical textiles for decubitus prevention. Tribol Int2013;
65: 91–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.02.005.
47.
RoutPKSinghMK.Porosity determination of textile fabrics: A novel mathematical approach and experimental validation. Mater Today Commun2023;
37. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107559.
48.
AfrozFRashidMMIslamMMAkterS.Investigation on the effect of cotton-tencel (50:50) siro yarn twist multipliers on fabric stiffness. Heliyon2022;
8(12): e12498. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12498.
49.
StoffbergMEHunterLBothaA.The effect of fabric structural parameters and fiber type on the comfort-related properties of commercial apparel fabrics. J Nat Fibers2015;
12(6): 505–517. DOI: 10.1080/15440478.2014.967370.
50.
WangQYNakashimaTLaiCG, et al.
Modified algorithms for fast construction of optimal Latin-hypercube design. IEEE Access2020;
8: 191644–191658. DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3032122.
51.
WangPJLiGYLiuSRWeiXX.Structure design method of new balanced vibration reduction gear for the three cylinder engine. PLoS ONE2022;
17(4): e0266560. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266560.
52.
GregoryDEMilosavljevicSPalPCallaghanJP.An examination of shoulder kinematics and kinetics when using a commercial trunk harness while sheep shearing. Appl Ergonom2008;
39(1): 29–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.04.001.
53.
NamDKwonMKimJAhnB.Development of pant-type harness with fabric air-pocket for pain relief. Appl Sci Basel2019;
9(9): 1921. DOI: 10.3390/app9091921.
54.
HsiaoHWTurnerNWhislerRZwienerJ.Impact of harness fit on suspension tolerance. Human Factors2012;
54(3): 346–357. DOI: 10.1177/0018720811434962.
55.
TurnerNLWassellJTWhislerRZwienerJ.Suspension tolerance in a full-body safety harness, and a prototype harness accessory. J Occup Environ Hygiene2008;
5(4): 227–231. DOI: 10.1080/15459620801894386.
56.
KalkhovenJTWatsfordMLImpellizzeriFM.A conceptual model and detailed framework for stress-related, strain-related, and overuse athletic injury. J Sci Med Sport2020;
23(8): 726–734. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.02.002.
57.
LiuCZhaoMMZhangWC, et al.
Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: A finite element analysis. Spine J2024;
24(6): 1121–1131. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.017.
58.
HuangJLongYC (eds.). A study on the effect of age on the injury criteria and modeling of lower extremity long bone. In: 8th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA), Macau, PR China, 11–12 March 2016.
59.
LiuYDengZMChenYR (eds.). The mechanical properties study of woven fabrics. In: 2nd International Conference on Advanced Measurement and Test (AMT 2011), Nanchang, PR China, 2011, vol. 6, pp. 24–26.
60.
XieZYLiJGLiuYLiuKSLiWB.Effect of structural parameters on tensile properties of alumina fabrics. Text Res J2023;
93(9–10): 2095–2102. DOI: 10.1177/00405175221136295.
61.
BaszczynskiK.New test method with a hybrid III anthropomorphic dummy for textile safety harnesses. Fibres Text East Eur2020;
28(1): 81–86. DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.5861.
62.
FokQNYipJYickKLNgSP.Design and fabrication of anisotropic textile brace for exerting corrective forces on spinal curvature. J Ind Text2022;
51(1 Suppl): 1682S–1702S. DOI: 10.1177/15280837211032619.
