The Fate of a Monofunctional N-Methylol Reagent on Pad-Dry-Cure Reaction with Cotton

Abstract

Chemically modified cottons resulting from reactions of hydroxymethylmethylethyleneurea (HMEU) and methoxymeihylmethyletbyleneurea (MMEU) with cotton fabric at 160°C by zinc nitrate catalysis were studied. From these cottons modified with the monofunctional analog of dimethylolethyleneurea (DMEU) positive evidence was found for the presence of trapped dimer of HMEU and for oxymethylene linkages in addition to the expected methyleneethyleneurea substituents. The estimate is: for approximately 1% of bound nitrogen or 4% add-on of HMEU, half of the nitrogen is present as the methyleneethyleneurea substituents; the remaining nitrogen is primarily dimer of HMEU; and 0.1% formaldehyde (on weight of fabric) is present as oxymethylene linkages. This estimate corresponds to 0.2 mol of oxymethylene linkages and 1 mol of trapped ethyleneurea units per mole of covalently attached methyleneethyleneurea substituents. The results are discussed relative to structures developed when cotton is treated with DMEU.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates, N.A. , Evidence for the Reaction of Cellulose with Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin, Tappi 49, 184 (1966).

Bullock, A.L. and Rowland, S.P. , Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Study of Selected Derivatives of 2-Imidazolidinone, Anal. Cliem. 42, 1783-1786 (1970).

Cooke, T.F. , Roth, P.B. , Salsbury, J.M. , Swestlyk, G. , and van Loo, W.J. , Comparison of Wrinkle-Resistant Finishes for Cotton, Textile Res. J. 27, 150-165 (1957).

Frick, J.G., Jr. , Kottes, B.A. , and Reid, J.D. , Chemical and Physical Effects of Finishing Cotton with Methylol Derivatives of Ethyleneurea, Textile Res. J. 39, 314-322 (1959).

Gilbert, R.D. , and Rhodes, J.H. , Application of Differential Scanning Calorimetry to the Identification of Crosslinks in Cellulose, J. Polymer Sci., Part C 30, 509-520 (1970).

Mehta, P.C. and Mody, J.R. , Reaction of Dimethylol Ethylene Urea with Cotton, Textile Res. J. 30, 532-539 (1960).

Mitcham, D. and Tripp, V.W. , Private Communication.

Roff, W.J. , The Determination of the Formaldehyde Yield of Cellulose Textiles Treated with Formaldehyde, Urea-Formaldehyde. or Melamine-Formaldehyde, J. Textile Inst. 47, T309-T318 ( 1956).

Reinhardt, R.M. , Kullman, R.M.H. , Moore, H.B. , and Reid, J.D. , Aftermercerization of Wrinkle-Resistant Cottons for Improved Strength and Abrasion Resistance, Amer. Dyestuff Repir. 47(22), 758-764 (1958).

10.

Rowland, S.P. , Roberts, E.J. , and Stark, S.M., Jr. , Network Formation in Cotton Cellulose Modified with Tris(1-azlridinyl)-phosphine Oxide, Textile Res. J. 40, 405-410 (1970).

11.

Rowland, S.P. , Stark, S.M., Jr. , Cirino, V.O. , and Mason, J.S. , Structural Features of Cotton Treated by Pad-Dry-Cure, Mild-Cure, Poly-Set, and Wet-Fix Processes, Textile Res. J. 41, 57-64 (1971).

12.

Stark, S.M. , Jr. and Rowland, S.P. , Swelling Characteristics of Gel Fractions of Formaldehyde-Modified Cotton Celluloses, J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 10, 1777-1786 (1966).

13.

Ugelstad, J. and deJonge, J. , The Alkaline Hydrolysis of Alkoxymethyl Ureas , Acta Chemica Scand. 10, 1475-1487 (1956 ).

14.

Willard, J.J. , Turner, R. , and Schwenker, R.F., Jr. , Chemical Structure of Resin-Treated Cellulose, Part II. Trimethylol-melamine Bonding with Cotton, Textile Res. J. 36, 1051-1055 (1966).