In the literature on neighborhood activism, common hypotheses are that home ownership is a major explanatory variable, and that this is due to a concern for the home as an investment. The first hypothesis is validated but the second is not. Rather, the greater activism of homeowners when confronted by problems in the neighborhood stems in all likelihood from transaction cost barriers to relocation. Concern for the home as an investment, on the other hand, has little to do with the emergence of neighborhood problems and seems to be mainly a function of length of residence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AGNEW, J. A. (1978) "Market relations and locational conflict in cross-national perspective," pp. 128-143 in K. R. Cox (ed.) Urbanization and Conflict in Market Societies. New York: Methuen.
2.
BAILEY, R. K. (1972) Radicals in Urban Politics. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
3.
BALL, M. J. (1973) "Recent empirical work on the determinants of relative house prices."Urban Studies10: 213-233.
4.
BLALOCK, H. M. (1965) "Theory building and the concept of interaction."Amer. Soc. Rev.30: 374-380.
5.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1970) "Multivariate analysis for attribute data," in E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt (eds.) Sociological Methodology 1970. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1964) Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Macmillan.
7.
COX, K. R. and J. McCARTHY (1980) "Neighborhood in the American city: behavioral relations and evaluation."Urban Geography1: 22-28.
8.
HARRIS, C. C. (1977) "Changing conceptions of the relation between family and societal form in Western society," ch. 4 in R. Scase (ed.) Industrial Society: Class, Cleavage and Control. London: Allen & Unwin.
9.
HARVEY, D. (1978) "Labor, capital and class struggle around the built environment in advanced capitalist societies," pp. 9-37 in K. R. Cox (ed.) Urbanization and Conflict in Market Societies. New York: Methuen.
10.
JANOWITZ, M. (1951) The Community Press in an Urban Setting. New York: Macmillan.
11.
KEMENY, J. (1980) "Home ownership and privatization."Int. J. of Urban and Regional Research4: 372-388.
12.
LOWE, P. D. (1977) "Amenity and equity: a review of local environmental pressure groups in Britain."Environment and Planning9: 35-58.
13.
MODELL, J. (1979) "Suburbanization and change in the American family."J. of Interdisciplinary History9: 621-646.
14.
MOLOTCH, H. (1972) Managed Integration. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
15.
MORRISON, P. A. (1972) "Population movements and the shape of urban growth: implications for public policy," pp. 281-322 in S. M. Maizie (ed.) Population Distribution and Policy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
MORRISON, P. A. (1967) "Duration of residence and prospective migration: the evaluation of a stochastic model."Demography4: 553-561.
17.
ORBELL, J. M. and T. UNO (1972) "A theory of neighborhood problem solving: political action vs. residential mobility."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.61: 471-489.
18.
ROSSER, C. and C. C. HARRIS (1965) The Family and Social Change. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19.
SAUNDERS, P. (1979) Urban Politics. London: Hutchinson.
20.
SENNETT, R. (1970) The Uses of Disorder. New York: Vintage.
21.
WILLIAMS, O. P. (1971) Metropolitan Political Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
22.
WINGO, L. (1973) "The quality of life: toward a macroeconomic definition."Urban Studies10: 3-18.
23.
WOLF, E. and C. N. LEBEAUX (1969) Change and Renewal in an Urban Community. New York: Praeger.
