School Culture Change in the Making

Abstract

The urban elementary school profiled in this case study was considered low performing based on state-mandated assessment scores from the time the school opened its doors in 1998 until very recently, putting the school on academic watch under the terms of the No Child Left Behind Act. However, in recent years the school realized a significant turnaround with the placement of a proactive principal and internal specialized supports accompanied by district office support. Survey data on school culture measures demonstrate an improvement in professional communities of practice, collaborative leadership, and evidence-based practice. This case study provides evidence that leadership coupled with multiple and coherent district supports can result in dramatic change at a school in a short period.

Keywords

leadership culture change urban

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bryk, A. , Sebring, P.B. , Kerbow, D. , Rollow, S. , & Easton, J.Q. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Burch, P.E. , & Spillane, J.P. (2004). Leading from the middle: Midlevel district staff and instructional improvement. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform .

Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002 ). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: A recommended strategy for the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474378)

Coburn, C.E. , Toure, J. , & Yamashita, M. (in press). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making in the district central office. Teachers College Record.

Corbett, R. , Wilson, B. , & Williams, B. (2002). Effort and excellence in urban classrooms: Expecting—and getting—success with all students. New York: Teachers College Press.

Corcoran, T. , Furhman, S.H. , & Belcher, C.L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement . Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 78-84.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1988). Policy and professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55-77). New York: Teachers College Press.

Elmore, R.F. , & Burney, D. (1998, May). The challenge of school variability: Improving instruction in New York City's Community District #2 (Policy brief). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Elmore, R.F. , & Burney, D. (1999). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 263-291). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Louis, K.S. , Marks, H.M. , & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Education Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.

11.

Marks, H.M. , & Printy, S.M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.

12.

McLaughlin, M.W. , & Talbert, J. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. Chicago: University of Chicago.

13.

McLaughlin, M.W. , & Talbert, J. (2003). Reforming districts: How districts support school reform (Research report). Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

14.

Senge, P. , Cambron-McCabe, N. , Lucas, T. , Smith, B. , Dutton, J. , & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Doubleday/Currency .

15.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and method. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

17.

Youngs, P. , & King, M.B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly , 38(5), 643-670.