To what extent does the Freirean concept of submerged consciousness contribute towards understanding of tenant participation in housing stock transfers? This paper describes the policy and process of housing stock transfer, noting both its contested nature and the role of tenants in the process. It explores Freire's concept of submerged consciousness, relating it to a cliché common amongst tenants experiencing stock transfer—`better the devil you know'—before applying a Freirean analytical framework to an ethnographic study of a housing stock transfer. The paper concludes that Freire does offer a valuable analytical framework in respect of tenant participation in housing stock transfers, before offering some suggestions for further, related research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audit Commission/Housing Corporation (2001 ) Group dynamics: group structures and registered social landlords . Audit Commission, London.
2.
Barnes, M., Newman, J., Knops, A. and Sullivan, H. (2003) Constituting `the public' in public participation , Public Administration, 81(2), pp. 379-399.
3.
Cairns, T. (2003) Citizenship and regeneration: participation or incorporation?, in: P. Coare and R. Johnston (Eds) Adult Learning, Citizenship and Community Voices: Exploring Community-based Practice, pp. 108-123. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education .
4.
Card, P. and Mudd, J. (2006) The role of housing stock transfer organisations in neighbourhood regeneration: exploring the relationship between regeneration , `new localism' and social networks, Housing Studies, 21(2), pp. 253-267.
5.
Clapham, D. (2006) Housing policy and the discourse of globalization , European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), pp. 55-76.
6.
Cole, I. and Furbey, R. (1994) The Eclipse of Council Housing. London: Routledge.
7.
Daly, G., Mooney, G., Poole, L. and Davis, H. (2005) Housing stock transfer in Birmingham and Glasgow: two contrasting experiences of two UK cities, European Journal of Housing Policy, 5(3), pp. 327-341.
8.
Darcy, M. (2002) Community management: how management discourse killed participation, Critical Quarterly, 4(4), pp. 32-39.
9.
Defend Council Housing (2004) The case against stock transfer. October.
10.
DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1999) National framework for tenant participation compacts . DETR, London.
11.
DETR and DSS (Department of Social Security) (2000) Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All. London: HMSO.
12.
DTLR (Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions) (2001) Independent Tenant Advisers and Stock Transfer: A Good Practice Guide. London: The Stationery Office.
13.
Flint, J. (2003) Housing and ethopolitics: constructing identities of active consumption and responsible community, Economy and Society, 32(3), pp. 611-629.
14.
Freire, P. (1970/ 1996) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin Books.
15.
Freire, P. (1974/2005) Education for Critical Consciousness . London: Continuum Books.
16.
Freire, P. (1993/2005) Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare Teach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17.
Freire, P. (1998/2001) Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy and Civic Courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
18.
Fromm, E. (1942) The Fear of Freedom. London : Routledge.
19.
Ginsburg, N. (2005) The privatization of council housing, Critical Social Policy, 25(1), pp. 115-135.
20.
House of Commons Public Accounts Committe ( 2003) Fortieth Report of the Committee of Public Accounts: Improving Social Housing through Transfer. London: The Stationery Office.
21.
Housing Corporation (2006) Tenant empowerment programme: guidance on tenant-led stock options (http://www.housingcorp.gov.uk/upload/pdf/TLSO_Guide.pdf; accessed 17 November 2006).
22.
Inside Housing (2006) Associations triumphant as transfers hit one million , 3 November.
23.
Lukes, S. (1974/1983) Power: A Radical View. London: Macmillan.
24.
Malpass, P. (2001) The restructuring of social rented housing in Britain: de-municipalization and the rise of `registered social landlords', European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(1), pp. 1-16.
25.
Malpass, P. and Mullins, D. (2002) Local authority housing stock transfer in the UK: from local initiative to national policy, Housing Studies , 17(4), pp. 673-686.
26.
McCormack, J. (2008) Critical pedagogy, experiential learning and active citizenship: a Freirean perspective on tenant involvement in housing stock transfers, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(1), pp. 3-18.
27.
Millward, L. (2005) `Just because we are amateurs doesn't mean we aren't professionals': the importance of expert activists in tenant participation , Public Administration, 83(3), pp. 735-751.
28.
Mooney, G. and Poole, L. (2005) Marginalised voices: resisting the privatisation of council housing in Glasgow, Local Economy, 20(1), pp. 27-39.
29.
Mullins, D. and Murie, A. (2006) Housing Policy in the UK. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
30.
Murie, A. and Nevin, B. (2001) New Labour transfers, in: D. Cowan and A. Marsh (Eds) Two Steps Forward: Housing Policy into the New Millennium, pp. 29-45. Bristol : Policy Press.
31.
ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) ( 2003) Sustainable communities: building for the future. ODPM, London.
32.
Odpm (2004) Housing transfer manual: 2005 programme. ODPM, London.
33.
Pawson, H. (2006) Restructuring England's social housing sector since 1989: undermining or underpinning the fundamentals of public housing?, Housing Studies, 21(5), pp. 767-783.
34.
Robbins, G. (2002) Taking stock: regeneration programmes and social housing, Local Economy, 17(4), pp. 266-272.
35.
Sprigings, N. (2002) Delivering public services under the new public management: the case of public housing, Public Money and Management , October/December, pp. 266-272.
36.
Taylor, M. (1999) Unwrapping stock transfers: applying discourse analysis to landlord communication strategies, Urban Studies , 36(1), pp. 121-135.
37.
Walker, R. (2001) How to abolish public housing: implications and lessons from public management reform, Housing Studies, 16(5), pp. 675-696.
