Many local governments are adopting inclusionary zoning (IZ) as a means of producing affordable housing without direct public subsidies. In this paper, panel data on IZ in the San Francisco metropolitan area and suburban Boston are used to analyse how much affordable housing the programmes produce and how IZ affects the prices and production of market-rate housing. The amount of affordable housing produced under IZ has been modest and depends primarily on how long IZ has been in place. Results from suburban Boston suggest that IZ has contributed to increased housing prices and lower rates of production during periods of regional house price appreciation. In the San Francisco area, IZ also appears to increase housing prices in times of regional price appreciation, but to decrease prices during cooler regional markets. There is no evidence of a statistically significant effect of IZ on new housing development in the Bay Area.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baden, B.M. and Coursey, D.L. ( 1999) An examination of the effects of impact fees on Chicago’s suburbs. Working Paper No. 99-20, Harris School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago.
2.
Basolo, V. and Calavita, N. (2004) Policy claims with weak evidence: a critique of the Reason Foundation Study on inclusionary housing in the San Francisco Bay area. Working paper.
3.
Been, V. ( 1991) ‘Exit’ as a constraint on land use exactions: rethinking the unconstitutional conditions doctrine, Columbia Law Review, 91(3), pp. 473-545.
4.
Been, V. ( 2005) Impact fees and housing affordability, Cityscape8(1), pp. 139-185.
5.
Boston Redevelopment Authority (2006) Mayor Menino boosts affordable housing requirements. Press release, 1 May 2006 (http://www.cityofboston.gov/bra/press/PressDisplayFriendly.asp?TPressID=306).
6.
Brown, K.D. ( 2001) Expanding affordable housing through inclusionary zoning: lessons from the Washington metropolitan area. Brookings Institution Center of Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC.
7.
Brueckner, J.K. ( 1997) Infrastructure financing and urban development: the economics of impact fees, Journal of Public Economics, 66(3), pp. 383-407.
8.
Burge, G. and Ihlanfeldt, K.R. ( 2006) Impact fees and single-family home construction, Journal of Urban Economics, 60(2), pp. 284-306.
9.
Calavita, N. ( 2007) Inclusionary housing in the U.S. and Europe. Presentation made to National Inclusionary Housing Conference , San Francisco, CA, November ( http://www.inclusionary.org/2007SpeakerHandouts/ppt/IHIreland.ppt).
10.
Calavita, N. and Grimes, K. ( 1998) Inclusionary housing in California: the experience of two decades, Journal of the American Planning Association , 64(2), pp. 150-170.
11.
California Coalition for Rural Housing (2007 ) California inclusionary housing database ( http://calruralhousing.org/housing-toolbox/inclusionary-housing-policy-search ).
12.
California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-profit Housing Association of Northern California (2003) Inclusionary housing in California: 30 years of innovation (http://www.nonprofithousing.org/pdf_pubs/Inclusionary_Housing_CA_30years.pdf ).
13.
Clapp, J.M. ( 1981) The impact of inclusionary zoning on the location and type of construction activity, AREUEA Journal, 9, pp. 436-456.
14.
Cowan, S. ( 2006) Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion, and housing opportunity, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), pp. 295-313.
15.
Crook, T., Currie, J., Jackson, A. et al. (2002) Planning gain and affordable housing: making it count. Working paper, Centre for Housing and Planning Research, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
16.
Delaney, C.J. and Smith, M.T. ( 1989a) Impact fees and the price of new housing: an empirical study, AREUAE Journal, 17, pp. 41-54.
17.
Delaney, C.J. and Smith, M.T. ( 1989b) Pricing implications of development exactions on existing housing stock, Growth and Change, 20, pp. 1-12.
18.
Dietderich, A.G. ( 1997) An egalitarian’s market: the economics of inclusionary zoning reclaimed, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 24(23), pp. 23-104.
19.
DiPasquale, D. and Wheaton, W.C. ( 1996) Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Ellickson, R.C. (1980/81 ) The irony of ‘inclusionary’ zoning, Southern California Law Review, 54(6), pp. 1167-1216.
21.
Evans-Cowley, J.S. and Lawhon, L.L. ( 2003) The effects of impact fees on the price of housing and land: a literature review, Journal of Planning Literature , 17, pp. 351-359.
22.
Fischel, W. ( 1990) Do Growth Controls Matter? A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Local Government Land Use Regulation . Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
23.
Fox, R. and Rose, K. ( 2003) Expanding housing opportunity inWashington, DC: the case for inclusionary zoning. PolicyLink report, Oakland, CA.
24.
Glaeser, E., Gyourko J. and Saks, R. ( 2005) Why have housing prices gone up?, American Economic Review, 95(May, Papers and Proceedings), pp. 329-333.
25.
Glaeser, E., Schuetz, J. and Ward, B. ( 2006) Regulation and the rise of housing price in Greater Boston . PioneerInstitute for Public Policy Research and Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Cambridge, MA.
26.
Gyourko, J., Saiz, A. and Summers, A. (2006) A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: the Wharton residential land use regulatory index. Working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
27.
Hughes, M.A. and McGuire, T.J. ( 1991) A market for exclusion: trading low-income housing obligations under Mount Laurel III, Journal of Urban Economics, 29, pp. 207-217.
28.
Ihlanfeldt, K.R. and Shaughnessy, T.M. ( 2004) An empirical investigation of the effects of impact fees on housing and land markets, Regional Science and Urban Economics , 34(6), pp. 639-661.
29.
Katz, L. and Rosen, K.T. ( 1987) The interjurisdictional effects of growth controls on housing prices, Journal of Law and Economics, 30(1), pp. 149-160.
30.
Knapp, G.-J., Bento, A. and Lowe, S. ( 2008) Housing Market Impacts of Inclusionary Zoning. College Park, MD: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education.
31.
Malpezzi, S. ( 1996) Housing prices, externalities, and regulations in U.S. metropolitan areas, Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), pp. 209-241.
32.
Malpezzi, S. and Green, R.K. ( 1996) What has happened to the bottom of the US housing market? , Urban Studies, 33(10), pp. 1807-1820.
33.
Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (2004) Eligibility summary chapter 40B subsidized housing inventory (http://www.mass.gov/dhcd/).
34.
Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (2007) Chapter 40R and 40S explained: reaping the benefits of compact development (http://www.mass.gov/dhcd/components/SCP/ch40r/ch40s/default.htm).
35.
Mathur, S., Waddell, P. and Blanco, H. ( 2004) The effect of impact fees on the price of new single-family housing, Urban Studies, 41(7), pp. 1303-1312.
36.
Mayer, C.J. and Somerville, C.T. ( 2000) Land use regulation and new construction, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6), pp. 639-662.
37.
Monk, S., Crook, T., Lister, D. et al. (2005) Land and finance for affordable housing: the complementary roles of Social Housing Grant and the provision of affordable housing through the planning system. Working paper, Centre for Housing and Planning Research, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
38.
National Housing Council (2002) Inclusionary zoning: lessons learned in Massachusetts. NHC Affordable Housing Policy Review, Vol. 2, Issue 1.
39.
Nelson, A.C., Lillydahl, J.H., Frank, J.E. and Nicholas, J.C. ( 1992) Price effects of road and other impact fees on urban land , Transportation Research Record, 1305, pp. 36-41.
40.
Non-profit Housing Association of Northern California ( 2007) Affordable by choice: trends in California inclusionary housing programs (http://www.nonprofithousing.org/pdf_attachments/IHIReport.pdf).
41.
Norris, M. and Shiels, P. ( 2007) Housing affordability in the Republic of Ireland: is planning part of the problem or part of the solution?, Housing Studies , 22(1), pp. 45-62.
42.
Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research and the Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston (2005) Local housing regulation database, prepared by A. Dain and J. Schuetz ( http://www.masshousingregulations.com/).
43.
Pollakowski, H.O. and Wachter, S.M. ( 1990) The effects of land-use constraints on housing prices . Land Economics, 66(3), pp. 315-324.
44.
Powell, B. and Stringham, E. ( 2004a) Housing supply and affordability: do affordable housing mandates work?Policy Study No. 318, Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
45.
Powell, B. and Stringham, E. ( 2004b) Do affordable housing mandates work? Evidence from Los Angeles County and Orange County. Policy Study No. 318, Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, CA.
46.
Quigley, J.M. and Raphael, S. ( 2004) Is housing unaffordable? Why isn’t it more affordable? , Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(1), pp. 191-214.
47.
Rubin, J.I., Seneca, J.J. and Stotsky, J.G. ( 1990) Affordable housing and municipal choice, Land Economics, 66(3), pp. 325-340.
48.
Rusk, D. (2003) Table1: list of IZ laws (http://www.gamaliel.org/DavidRusk/Table%201-list%20of%201Z%20laws.pdf ).
49.
Schuetz, J. ( 2008) Guarding the town walls: mechanisms and motives for restricting multifamily housing in Massachusetts, Real Estate Economics , 36(3), pp. 555-586.
50.
Schuetz, J. ( 2009) No renters in my suburban backyard: land use regulation and rental housing, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 28(2), pp. 298-322.
51.
Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R. and Been, V. (2007) The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets: lessons from the San Francisco, Washington DC and suburban Boston areas . Working paper, Furman Center for Real Estate and Urban Policy, New York University (www.nhc.org/pdf/pub_chp_iz_08.pdf ).
52.
Schuetz, J., Meltzer, R. and Been, V.(2009) 31 flavors of inclusionary zoning: comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington DC and suburban Boston, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), pp. 1-16.
53.
Shen, Q. ( 1996) Spatial impacts of locally enacted growth controls: the San Francisco Bay region in the 1980s, Environment and Planning B, 23, pp. 61-91.
54.
Sims, K.R.E. and Schuetz, J.(2009) Environmental regulation and land use change: do local wet-lands bylaws slow the conversion of open space to residential uses?, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(4), pp. 409-421.
55.
Singell, L.D. and Lillydahl, J.H. ( 1990) Housing impact fees, Land Economics, 66(1), pp. 82-92.
56.
Skaburskis, A. and Qadeer, M. ( 1992) An empirical estimation of the price effects of development impact fees, Urban Studies, 29, pp. 653-667.
57.
Skidmore, M. and Peddle, M. ( 1998) Do development impact fees reduce the rate of residential development?, Growth and Change, 29, pp. 383-400.
58.
Vandell, K.D. ( 2003) Inclusionary zoning: myths and realities. Working paper, Center for Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
59.
Whitehead, C.M.E. ( 2007) Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study?, Housing Studies, 22(1), pp. 25-44.
