Is the ‘New Deal for Communities’ a New Deal for Equality? Getting Women on Board in Neighbourhood Governance

Abstract

Across the EU, neighbourhoods have been the focus for achieving social cohesion and reducing social exclusion. Neighbourhood renewal and community involvement were central themes in the UK Labour government’s urban policy. This article focuses on the challenge of community engagement given the heterogeneity of individuals and neighbourhoods. It uses the case study of a New Deal for Communities (NDC) partnership to explore the experiences of different women on an NDC board, including those from minority ethnic groups. The NDC in the case study provides optimism about the possibility of including diverse groups and people in neighbourhood governance, yet too little attention is still given at both national policy and neighbourhood levels to working politically and productively with concepts of ethnicity and gender.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Cars

(2001) Multiculturalism and governing neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2195–2209.

Anderson

(1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Appleton

(1999) Women build, men take over! Women’s involvement in Sheffield SRB partnerships, The Regional Review, 9(2), pp. 13–15.

Atkinson

Carmichael

(2007) Neighbourhood as a new focus for action in the urban policies of west European states, in: Smith

Lepine

Taylor

(Eds) Disadvantaged by Where you Live? Proving and Improving the Capacity of Neighbourhood Governance, pp. 43–63. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Barnes

(2009) Alliances, contention and oppositional consciousness: can participation generate subversion?, in: Barnes

Prior

(Eds) Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services, pp. 33–48. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Barnes

Newman

Knops

Sullivan

(2003) Constituting the public for public participation, Public Administration, 81(2), pp. 379–399.

Barnes

Skelcher

Beirens

. (2008) Designing Citizen-centred Governance. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Batty

Beatty

Foden

. (2010) Involving Local People in Regeneration: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme. London: The Stationery Office.

Beebeejaun

(2004) What’s in a nation? Professional constructions of ethnicity in the British planning system, Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), pp. 437–451.

10.

Beebeejaun

(2006) The participation trap: the limits of participation for ethnic and racial groups, International Planning Studies, 11(1), pp. 3–18.

11.

Beebeejaun

Grimshaw

(2007) Capturing diversity issues in neighbourhood governance and management, in: Smith

Lepine

Taylor

(Eds) Disadvantaged by Where you Live? Proving and Improving the Capacity of Neighbourhood Governance, pp. 145–163. Bristol: The Policy Press.

12.

Bhabha

(1999) Is multiculturalism bad for women?, in: Cohen

Howard

Nussbaum

(Eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, pp. 79–84. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

13.

Blakeley

Evans

(2008) ‘It’s like maintaining a hedge’: constraints on citizen engagement in community regeneration in east Manchester, Public Policy and Administration, 23(1), pp. 100–113.

14.

Brownill

Darke

(1998) ‘Rich Mix’ Inclusive Strategies for Urban Regeneration. Bristol: Policy Press.

15.

Bryman

(1989) Research Methods and Organization Studies. London: Routledge.

16.

CLG (Communities and Local Government) (2007) Muslim women to advise government on preventing violent extremism ( http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/corporate/554064 ; accessed 10 July 2009).

17.

CLG (2008) Communities in Control: Real People, Real Power. Cm 742. London: The Stationery Office.

18.

Cooke

Kothari

(2001) Participation, the New Tyranny? London: ZED Books.

19.

CRESR (Centre for Regional, Economic and Social Research) (2005) New Deal for Communities 2001–2005: an interim evaluation. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.

20.

Dargan

(2009) Participation and local urban regeneration: the case of the New Deal for Communities (NDC) in the UK, Regional Studies, 43(2), pp. 305–317.

21.

Delanty

(2003) Community. London: Routledge.

22.

DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1998) New Deal for Communities: phase 1 proposals: guidance for pathfinder applicants. DETR, London.

23.

DETR (2000) New Deal for Communities race equality guidance. DETR, London.

24.

Dinham

(2005) Empowered or over-powered? The real experiences of local participation in the UK’s New Deal for Communities, Community Development Journal, 40(3), pp. 301–312.

25.

Dovi

(2002) Preferable descriptive representatives: will just any woman, black or latino do?, American Political Science Review, 96(4), pp. 729–743.

26.

Gedalof

(2007) Unhomely homes: women, family and belonging in UK discourses of migration and asylum, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), pp. 77–94.

27.

Geddes

(2000) Tackling social exclusion in the European Union? The limits to the new orthodoxy of local partnership, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(4), pp. 782–800.

28.

Gerson

Horowitz

(2002) Observation and interviewing: options and choices, in: May

(Ed.) Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 199–224. London: Sage.

29.

Gosling

V. K.

(2008) Regenerating communities: women’s experiences of urban regeneration, Urban Studies, 45(3), pp. 607–626.

30.

Grimshaw

(2009) The role of women in regeneration organisations. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of the West of England.

31.

Gudnadottir

Smith

Robson

Corry

(2007) Where are all the women in LSPs? Urban Forum, London.

32.

Hackworth

(2005) Progressive activism in a neoliberal context: the case of efforts to retain public housing in the United States, Studies in Political Economy, 75, pp. 29–51.

33.

Imrie

Raco

(Eds) (2003) Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

34.

Jones

P. S.

(2003) Urban regeneration’s poisoned chalice, Urban Studies, 40(3), pp. 581–601.

35.

Kennett

Forrest

(2006) The neighbourhood in a European context, Urban Studies, 43(4), pp. 713–718.

36.

Lawless

(2004) Locating and explaining area-based urban initiatives: New Deal for Communities in England, Environment and Planning C, 22, pp. 383–399.

37.

Loftman

Beazley

(1998) Race and regeneration. Local Government Information Unit, London.

38.

Lowndes

(2004) Getting on or getting by? Women, social capital and political participation, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(1), pp. 45–64.

39.

MacLeavy

(2008) Managing diversity? ‘Community cohesion’ and its limits in neoliberal urban policy, Geography Compass, 2(2), pp. 538–558.

40.

MacLeavy

(2009) (Re)analysing community empowerment: rationalities and technologies of government in Bristol’s New Deal for Communities, Urban Studies, 46(4), pp. 849–875.

41.

Mason

(2002) Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.

42.

ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2004) Board effectiveness: guidelines for New Deal for Communities: programme note 27. ODPM, London.

43.

Okin

S. M.

(1999) Is multiculturalism bad for women?, in: Cohen

Howard

Nussbaum

(Eds.) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, pp. 9–24. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

44.

Parkinson

(2004) Hearing voices: negotiating representation claims in public deliberation, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(3) pp. 370–388.

45.

Riseborough

(1997) Regeneration and the curious tale of gender blindness, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(7), pp. 611–621.

46.

Robinson

Shaw

Davidson

(2005) ‘On the side of angels’: community involvement in the governance of neighbourhood renewal, Local Economy, 20(1), pp. 13–26.

47.

SEU (Social Exclusion Unit) (1998) Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal. Cmd 4045. London: The Stationery Office.

48.

Silverman

(2005) Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

49.

Skeggs

(2005) The making of class through visualising moral subject formation, Sociology, 39(5), pp. 965–982.

50.

Smith

Lepine

Taylor

(Eds) (2007) Disadvantaged by Where You Live? Proving and Improving the Capacity of Neighbourhood Governance, pp. 145–163. Bristol: The Policy Press.

51.

Smith

(2001) Communitarianism and gender in the new urban policy, in: Pearson

Smith

(Eds) Rebuilding Community, pp. 189–205. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

52.

Squires

(1993) Introduction, in: Squires

(Ed.) Principled Positions: Postmodernism and the Rediscovery of Value, pp. 1–13. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

53.

Sullivan

(2009) Social capital, in: Davies

J. S.

Imbroscio

D. L.

(Eds) Theories of Urban Politics, 2nd edn, pp. 221–239. London: Sage.

54.

Taylor

(2000) Communities in the lead: power, organisational capacity and social capital, Urban Studies, 37(5/6), pp. 1019–1035.

55.

Whitehead

(2007) The architecture of partnerships: urban communities in the shadow of hierarchy, Policy and Politics, 35(1), pp. 3–23.

56.

Worley

(2005) ‘It’s not about race. It’s about the community’: New Labour and community cohesion, Critical Social Policy, 25(4), pp. 483–496.

57.

Yin

R. K.

(1993) Applications of Case Study Research. London: Sage.

58.

Young

I. M.

(2000) Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

59.

Yuval-Davis

(1997) Gender and Nation. London: Sage.