Choice-based letting (CBL) has been widely introduced to the social housing sector in England to give applicants more freedom in where they live. Concerns have been expressed that giving people more choice in residential locations has the potential to increase neighbourhood segregation. It has also been argued that a lack of real choice, not self-segregation, might be a cause of social and ethnic segregation. In social housing, real choice might not be available and the most vulnerable are likely to access the easiest housing options: often in deprived and segregated neighbourhoods. This paper analyses the probability that households applying for social housing using different allocation systems end up in deprived or ethnically concentrated neighbourhoods. Using unique data representing lettings made in the social housing sector in England, it is shown that ethnic minorities, and especially those using CBL, are the most likely to end up in deprived and ethnic concentration neighbourhoods.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyN.LivingstonM. (2008) Selective migration and area deprivation: evidence from 2001 census migration data for England and Scotland, Urban Studies, 45, pp. 943–961.
2.
BoltG.van KempenR.van HamM. (2008) Minority ethnic groups in the Dutch housing market: spatial segregation, relocation dynamics and housing policy, Urban Studies, 45, pp. 1359–1384.
3.
BowesA.DarN.SimD. (1997) Tenure preference and housing strategy: an exploration of Pakistani experiences, Housing Studies, 12, pp. 63–84.
4.
BrownT.KingP. (2005) The power to choose: effective choice and housing policy, European Journal of Housing Policy, 5, pp. 59–75.
5.
BrownT.YatesN. (2005) Allocations and lettings: taking customer choice forward in England?, European Journal of Housing Policy, 5, pp. 343–357.
6.
Cabinet Office (2003) Ethnic minorities and the labour market: interim analytical report. Cabinet Office, London.
7.
ChampionT. (1996) Internal migration and ethnicity in Britain, in: RatcliffeP. (Ed.) Social Geography and Ethnicity in Britain: Geographical Spread, Spatial Concentration and Internal Migration (Ethnicity in the 1991 Census, Vol. 3), pp. 135–173. London: HMSO.
8.
CHR (Centre for Housing Research) (2009) Housing association and local authority key findings digest for lettings and sales. Tenant Services Authority, London.
9.
ClaphamD.KintreaK. (1984) Allocation systems and housing choice, Urban Studies, 21, pp. 261–269.
10.
ClaphamD.KintreaK. (1991) Housing allocation and the role of the public rented sector, in: DonnisonD.MaclennanD. (Eds) The Housing Service of the Future, pp. 53–74. Harlow: Longman.
11.
ClarkW. (1991) Residential preferences and neighbourhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model, Demography, 28, pp. 1–19.
12.
ClarkW. (1992) Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context, Demography, 29, pp. 451–466.
13.
CLG (Communities Local Government) (2007) Using the English Indices of Deprivation 2007. London: HMSO.
14.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1975) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
15.
CoombesM.RaybouldS. (2004) Finding work in 2001: urban–rural contrasts across England in employment rates and local job availability, Area, 36, pp. 202–222.
CRE (Commission for Racial Equality) (1990) Racial discrimination in an Oldham estate agency: report of formal investigation into Normal Lester and Co.CRE, London.
18.
CRE (Commission for Racial Equality) (2004) Race and council housing in Hackney: a general investigation. CRE, London.
19.
CrowderK. (2000) The racial context of white mobility: an individual-level assessment the white flight hypothesis, Social Science Research, 29, pp. 223–257.
20.
DCLG (Department for Communities and Local Government) (2007) The English indices of deprivation (www.communities.gov.uk).
21.
DekkerK.RowlandsR. (2005) Tackling social cohesion in ethnically diverse estates, in: van KempenR.DekkerK.HallS.TosicsI. (Eds) Restructuring Large Housing Estates in European Cities: An Introduction, pp. 105–126. Bristol: Policy Press.
22.
DenhamJ. (2001) Building cohesive communities: a report of the ministerial group on public order and community cohesion. Community Cohesion Unit, Home Office, London.
23.
DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (2000a) Our Towns and Cities: The Future: Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: HMSO.
24.
DETR (2000b) Quality and choice: a decent home for all: the housing green paper. DETR, London.
25.
DorlingD.ReesP. (2003) A nation still dividing: the British census and social polarization 1971–2001, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 1287–1313.
26.
DukeC. (1970) Colour and rehousing: a study of redevelopment in Leeds. Institute of Race Relations, Leeds.
27.
ElsterJ. (1999) Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction, and Human Behavior. Bradford: Bradford Books.
28.
EmersonM. O.ChaiK. J.YanceyG. (2001) Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans, American Sociological Review, 66, pp. 922–935.
29.
FeijtenP. M.van HamM. (2009) Neighbourhood change … reason to leave?, Urban Studies, 46, pp. 2103–2122.
30.
FitzpatrickS.PawsonH. (2006) Welfare safety net or tenure of choice? The dilemma facing social housing policy in England, Housing Studies, 22, pp. 163–182.
31.
GalsterG. (2001) On the nature of neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38, pp. 2111–2124.
32.
van HamM.ClarkW. A. V. (2009) Neighbourhood mobility in context: household moves and changing neighbourhoods in the Netherlands, Environment and Planning A, 41, pp. 1442–1459.
33.
van HamM.FeijtenP. (2008) Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effect of being different from the neighbourhood population on wishes to move, Environment and Planning A, 40, pp. 1151–1170.
34.
van HamM.ManleyD. (2009) Social housing allocation, choice and neighbourhood ethnic mix in England, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, pp. 407–422.
35.
HarrisD. R. (1999) Property values drop when blacks move in, because …: racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighbourhood desirability, American Sociological Review, 64, pp. 461–479.
36.
HendersonJ.KarnV. (1984) Race, class and the allocation of public housing in Britain, Urban Studies, 21, pp. 115–128.
37.
HickmanP.RobinsonD. (2006) Transforming social housing: taking stock of new complexities, Housing Studies, 21, pp. 157–170.
38.
Home Office (2001) Building cohesive communities: a report of the ministerial group on public order and community cohesion. Home Office, London.
39.
IhlanfeldtK. R.ScafidiB. (2002) Black self-segregation as a cause of housing segregation: evidence from the multi-city study of urban inequality, Journal of Urban Economics, 51, pp. 366–390.
40.
Independent Review Team (2001) Community cohesion: a report of the independent review team. Home Office, London.
41.
IonnidesY. M.ZabelJ. E. (2003) Neighbourhood effects and housing demand, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, pp. 563–584.
42.
JohnstonR. (2006) School and residential ethnic segregation: an analysis of variations across England’s local education authorities, Regional Studies, 40, pp. 973–990.
43.
JohnstonR.ForrestJ.PoulsenM. (2002) Are there ethnic enclaves/ghettos in English cities?, Urban Studies, 39, pp. 591–618.
44.
JonesC.MurieA. (2006) The Right to Buy: Analysis and Evaluation of a Housing Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
45.
KullbergJ. (1997) From waiting lists to adverts: the allocation of social rented dwellings in the Netherlands, Housing Studies, 12, pp. 393–403.
46.
KullbergJ. (2002) Consumers’ responses to choice based letting mechanisms, Housing Studies, 17, pp. 549–579.
47.
MalpassP.MurieA. (1994) Housing Policy and Practice, 4th edn.London: Macmillan Press.
48.
MarshA. (2004) The inexorable rise of the rational consumer? The Blair government and the reshaping of social housing, European Journal of Housing Policy, 4, pp. 185–207.
49.
MarshA.CowenD.CameronA.. (2004) Piloting choice based lettings: an evaluation. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
50.
MeenG.MeenJ.NygaardC. (2007) A tale of two Victorian cities in the 21st century. Discussion Paper No. 7, International Centre for Housing and Urban Economics, University of Reading.
51.
ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2005) Planning for mixed communities. ODPM, London.
52.
ONS (Office for National Statistics) (2010) Rural and urban statistics in England: guidance notes. ONS (http://www.ons.gov.uk; accessed 3 July 2010).
53.
PawsonH.KintreaK. (2002) Part of the problem or part of the solution? Social housing allocation policies and social exclusion in Britain, Journal of Social Policy, 31, pp. 643–667.
54.
PawsonH.WatkinsD. (2007) Quasi-marketing access to social housing in Britain: assessing the distributional impacts, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22, pp. 149–175.
55.
PawsonH.JonesC.DonohoeT.. (2006) Monitoring the Longer Term Impact of Choice Based Lettings. London: HMSO.
56.
PeachC. (1996) Does Britain have ghettos?, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21, pp. 216–235.
57.
PermentierM.van HamM.BoltG. (2008) Same neighbourhood … different views? A confrontation of internal and external neighbourhood reputations, Housing Studies, 23, pp. 833–855.
58.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA. (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata, 2nd edn.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
59.
RobinsonD. (2005) The search for community cohesion: key themes and dominant concepts of public policy agenda, Urban Studies, 42, pp. 1411–1421.
60.
SarreP.PhillipsD.SkellingtonR. (1989) Ethnic Minority Housing: Explanations and Policies. Aldershot: Avebury.
61.
SchellingT. C. (1969) Models of segregation, The American Economic Review, 59, pp. 488–493.
62.
SchellingT. C. (1971) Dynamic models of segregation, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 143–186.
63.
SEH (Survey of English Housing) (2007) Housing in England 2005/06: a report principally from the 2005/06 Survey of English Housing. Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
64.
SimpsonA. (1981) Stacking the decks. Nottingham Community Relations Council, Nottingham.
65.
SimpsonL. (2004) Statistics of racial segregation: measures, evidence and policy, Urban Studies, 41, pp. 661–681.
66.
SomervilleP. (2001) Allocating housing or letting people choose?, in: CowanD.MarshA. (Eds) Two Steps Forward: Housing Policy into the New Millennium, pp. 113–132. Bristol: Policy Press.
67.
TaubR. P.TaylorG. D.DunhamJ. D. (1984) Paths of Neighbourhood Change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
TaylorM. (1998) Combating the social exclusion of housing estates, Housing Studies, 13, pp. 819–832.
