We conducted focus groups with girls ages 14 to 17 (N = 43) to study how the dominant discourse of sexual risk shapes young women’s understanding of the sexual domain and their management of these presumably pervasive threats. Through inductive analysis, we developed a coding scheme focused on three themes: (a) types of sexual risk, (b) factors that moderate sexual risk, and (c) strategies for managing sexual risk. Collectively, participants identified many risks but distanced themselves from these by claiming that girls’ susceptibility is largely a function of personal factors and therefore avoidable given the right traits, values, and skills. We consider this reliance on other-blaming and self-exemption, as well as instances in which individual participants diverged from this group discourse, in the context of neoliberalism.
AdamB. D. (2005). Constructing the neoliberal sexual actor: Responsibility and care of the self in the discourse of barebackers. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 7, 333-346.
2.
American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Bay-ChengL. Y. (2003). The trouble of teen sex: The construction of adolescent sexuality through school-based sexuality education. Sex Education, 3, 61-74.
4.
Bay-ChengL. Y.Eliseo-ArrasR. K. (2008). The making of unwanted sex: Gendered and neoliberal norms in college women’s unwanted sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 45, 386-397.
5.
BrownW. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory & Event, 7, 1-43.
6.
BurnsA.TorreM. E. (2004). Shifting desires: Discourses of accountability in abstinence-only education in the United States. In HarrisA. (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 127-137). New York: Routledge.
7.
ByersE. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? A review of a program of research. In ByersE. S.O’SullivanL. F. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in dating relationships (pp. 7-25). New York: Haworth.
8.
CoburnD. (2000). Income inequality, social cohesion and the health status of populations: The role of neoliberalism. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 135-146.
9.
FieldsJ. (2008). Risky lessons: Sex education and social inequality. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.
FineM. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29-53.
11.
FineM.McClellandS. I. (2006). Sexuality education and the discourse of desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76, 297-338.
12.
FreednerN.FreedL. H.YangY. W.AustinS. B. (2002). Dating violence among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents: Results from a community survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 469-474.
13.
FurnhamA. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795-817.
14.
GaveyN. (2005). Just sex? The cultural scaffolding of rape. New York: Routledge.
15.
GirouxH. A. (2004). The terror of neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and the eclipse of democracy. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press.
16.
GlassnerB. (1999). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
18.
HarrisA. (2005). Discourses of desire as governmentality: Young women, sexuality and the significance of safe spaces. Feminism & Psychology, 15, 39-43.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
21.
JowettM.O’TooleG. (2006). Focusing researchers’ minds: Contrasting experiences of using focus groups in feminist qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 6, 453-472.
22.
KellyP. (2001). Youth at risk: Processes of individualisation and responsibilisation in the risk society. Discourse, 22, 23-33.
23.
LambS. (1999). New versions of victims: Feminists struggle with the concept. New York: New York University Press.
24.
LeskoN. (1996). Denaturalizing adolescence: The politics of contemporary representations. Youth and Society, 28, 139-161.
25.
MardorossianC. M. (2002). Towards a new feminist theory of rape. Signs: A Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27, 743-777.
26.
MartinJ. A.HamiltonB. E.SuttonP. D.VenturaS. J.MenackerF.KirmeyerS.. (2009). Births: Final data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports, 57(7). Retrieved September 6, 2010, from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_07.pdf
27.
McRobbieA. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 255-264.
28.
MorokoffP. J. (2000). A cultural context for sexual assertiveness in women. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W. (Eds.), Sexuality, society, and feminism (pp. 299-319). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29.
MuehlenhardC. L.PetersonZ. D. (2005). Wanting and not wanting sex: The missing discourse of ambivalence. Feminism and Psychology, 15, 15-20.
30.
NafstadH. E.BlakarR. M.CarlquistE.PhelpsJ. M.Rand-HendriksenK. (2009). Globalization, neo-liberalism and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 43, 162-175.
31.
NorrisJ.NuriusP. S.DimeffL. A. (1996). Through her eyes: Factors affecting women’s perception of and resistance to acquaintance sexual aggression threat. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 123-145.
32.
PadgettD. K. (1998). Qualitative methods in social work: Challenges and rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
PattonM. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34, 1189-1208.
34.
PeekL.FothergillA. (2009). Using focus groups: Lessons from studying daycare centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina. Qualitative Research, 9, 31-59.
35.
PhillipsL. M. (2000). Flirting with danger: Young women’s reflections on sexuality and domination. New York: New York University Press.
36.
RickertV. I.WiemannC. M.VaughanR. D.WhiteJ. W. (2004). Rates and risk factors for sexual violence among an ethnically diverse sample of adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158, 1132-1139.
37.
ShovellerJ. A.JohnsonJ. L. (2006). Risky groups, risky behaviour, and risky persons: Dominating discourses on youth sexual health. Critical Public Health, 16, 47-60.
38.
TestaM.LivingstonJ. A.VanZile-TamsenC. (2005). The impact of questionnaire administration mode on response rate and reporting of consensual and nonconsensual sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 345-352.
39.
TieferL. (2004). Sex is not a natural act and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview.
40.
TolmanD. L. (2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
TolmanD. L. (2003). Improving women’s sexual assertiveness. Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 35, 48.
42.
TravisC. B. (2006). Risks to healthy development: The somber planes of life. In WorellJ.GoodheartC. D. (Eds.), Handbook of girls’ and women’s psychological health: Gender and well-being across the life span (pp. 15-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
WeinstockH.BermanS.CatesW.Jr. (2004). Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: Incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 6-10.
44.
WilkinsonS. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21, 111-125.
