Evaluation of HIV Reporting Form in Sana’a City,Yemen,2016

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS is a leading cause of disease burden and mortality in many countries of the world. ¹ The number of people living with HIV/AIDS has been increasing and reached 36.7 million at the end of 2016. ² At the same time, HIV/AIDS mortality has been declining from a peak of 1.8 million deaths in 2005 to 1.2 million deaths in 2015. ³ In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, 230 000 people were estimated to live with HIV in 2015. In the same year, there were about 21 000 new HIV infections and 12 000 AIDS-related deaths. ⁴ Despite that MENA had a low HIV prevalence, it becomes an area of concern because of the rise in AIDS-related deaths as a result of poor access to antiretroviral treatment (ART), with only 24% of those requiring ART in the region having access—far below the global level of 53%. ⁵

Since the detection of the first HIV case in Yemen in 1987, the Ministry of Public Health and Population (MoPHP) established the National AIDS Program (NAP) to monitor and control HIV spreads. The major activities of NAP included providing antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV in 5 governorates, providing voluntary counseling and testing, providing initiated testing and counseling services at 36 sites in several governorates, and prevention of mother-to-child transmission. In 2004, the program followed the Primary Health Care Directorate. The program receives reports every 3 months from different NAP sites. According to the 2011 HIV estimates of NAP, Yemen had a low prevalence of HIV (0.2%). ⁶ A total of 3995 HIV cases were reported during the years 1987-2013. ⁷

It is evident that a very rigorous, advanced, and consistent surveillance system is needed to control HIV spread. The system needs to go beyond the detection of infected cases to plunge in the inherent root causes and risk behaviors that stimulate the progression of the epidemic. ⁴ A standardized form is cornerstone to ensure standard data collection. This study aimed to determine the usefulness of the HIV reporting form and assess its performance in Sana’a city according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.

Methods

Results

Participants’ Characteristics

A total of 311 physicians from several public and private health facilities in Sana’a city were interviewed. Of the men, 108 (71%) were general practitioners (GP) and 45 (29%) were specialists. Of the women, 127 (80%) were GPs and 31 (20%) were specialists. The distribution of participants according to health facility is shown in Table 1.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 1.

Distribution of Participants by Type of Health Facility in Sana’a City, 2016.

Sex	Male		Female		Total
Type and kind of health facility	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Public hospitals	85	56	66	42	151	49
Private hospitals	45	29	56	35	101	32
Public health centers	6	4	11	7	17	6
Private health centers	17	11	25	16	42	14
Total	153	100	158	100	311	100

Usefulness

A total of 279 (89.7%) physicians stated that the surveillance data are useful for decision makers and 180 (57.9%) stated that the data help to identify the areas at greater risk (Table 2). The overall usefulness score was 76%, indicating average usefulness.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 2.

Usefulness, Simplicity, Flexibility, and Acceptability of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reporting Form, Yemen 2016.

Attribute/statement	Strongly disagree/disagree		Not sure		Agree/strongly agree
Usefulness	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
Data form is useful for decision makers	3	1	29	9.3	279	89.7
The form is identifying areas at greater risk	9	2.9	122	39.2	180	57.9
Simplicity
The form is clear	17	5.5	11	3.5	283	91
The form is easy to fill	2	0.6	5	1.6	304	97.7
The form ensures the privacy of customer’s identity	31	10	67	21.5	213	68.5
The form is detailed	9	2.9	35	11.3	267	85.9
The form contains sufficient data	19	6.1	73	23.5	219	70.4
Filling out the form needs a trained specialist	105	33.8	88	28.3	118	37.9
Notification form has case definition of the problem	81	26	112	36	118	37.9
Flexibility
HIV/AIDS case definition is easy to apply	30	9.6	85	27.3	196	63
HIV tests mentioned in the form are enough	16	5.1	40	12.9	255	82
In case of having case definition, it is applicable	16	5.1	126	40.5	169	54.3
You can add other data in this form	34	10.9	107	34.4	170	54.7
The form adapted to integrate with other surveillance such as tuberculosis	26	8.4	161	51.8	124	39.9
Acceptability
You do not mind to fill this form	7	2.3	22	7.1	282	90.7
You are completely satisfied with HIV surveillance system form	17	5.5	119	38.3	175	56.3

Summary of the Performance Attributes

Table 3 shows the summary of the performance attributes of HIV reporting form according to sex of physicians and type of health facility. The overall performance scores for usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, and acceptability did not differ significantly between physicians according to sex and type of health facility.

OPEN IN VIEWER

Table 3.

Summary of the Performance Attributes of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reporting Form According to Sex of Physicians and Type of Health Facility.

Attributes	Variables		p value
	Hospitals, %	Health centers, %
Usefulness	76.4	75.7	.955
Simplicity	65.9	62.7	.754
Flexibility	69.6	68.0	.934
Acceptability	75.5	73.0	.816
	Public, %	Private, %
Usefulness	75.4	77.0	.944
Simplicity	64.6	66.0	.906
Flexibility	68.4	70.4	.902
Acceptability	74.5	75.4	.970
	Male, %	Female, %
Usefulness	75.8	76.2	.960
Simplicity	75.5	73.8	.830
Flexibility	73.4	71.5	.804
Acceptability	75.4	75.1	.944

Discussion

This study showed that the HIV/AIDS reporting form was clear and easy to fill. This finding was reported in another study in Portugal. ⁹ The simplicity of the reporting form was average. For improving the simplicity of the form, HIV/AIDS case definition should be modified and written in the reporting form.

The form was found to contain detailed and sufficient data. This finding is not in agreement with the findings of another study in Italy. ¹⁰ In agreement with the findings of a study in St. Lucia, ¹¹ the form was found to ensure privacy of patients. However, the form does not have a clear case definition. Therefore, the HIV/AIDS case should be made more clear.

Regarding the flexibility of the HIV/AIDS reporting form, HIV case definition was applicable. Adding other necessary data to the reporting form was reported to be possible. It is recommended to adapt the reporting form to be integrated with other surveillance such as tuberculosis surveillance.

The physicians showed willingness to use the reporting form. However, almost half of the participants were completely satisfied with the HIV surveillance system form. This finding might be due to inadequate health workers’ knowledge and experience in dealing with this form. Therefore, training health professionals on the reporting form and increasing their awareness on the value of reporting are expected to improve the acceptability.

One of the main limitations of this study is that not all performance attributes of the surveillance system were assessed, such as completeness, accuracy and reliability of data, and timeliness. In conclusion, the HIV/AIDS reporting form of the HIV surveillance system was scored average in usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, and acceptability. The HIV/AIDS case definition should be modified and written in the reporting form. Training health workers on using the reporting form would improve the performance of HIV/AIDS reporting. Moreover, the reporting form could be adapted to be integrated with other surveillance such as tuberculosis surveillance.