Message Formats,Numeracy,Risk Perceptions of Alcohol-Attributable Cancer,and Intentions for Binge Drinking Among College Students

Abstract

We conducted an experiment to examine whether risk perceptions of alcohol-attributable cancer influence college students’ binge-drinking intention and to explore how message formats (text, table, and graph) and numeracy influence risk perceptions of alcohol-attributable cancer. We found that a majority of participants (87%) perceive some risks of alcohol-attributable cancer. Risk messages in tabular and graphic formats are more effective in elevating risk perceptions, but there is no significant difference between these two formats. Numeracy and its interaction with message formats, however, do not predict risk perceptions. We recommend risk messages should be delivered using tabular or graphic formats to enhance risk perceptions. We also advocate the less-is-more principle in presenting risk information.

Keywords

binge drinking college students message formats numeracy risk perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayers

Myers

L. B.

(2012) Do media messages change people’s risk perceptions for binge drinking? Alcohol and Alcoholism 47: 52–56. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agr052.

Bazargan-Hejazi

Gaines

Duan

Cherpitel

C. J.

(2007) Correlates of injury among ED visits: Effects of alcohol, risk perception, impulsivity, and sensation seeking behaviors. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 33: 101–108.

Bernhardt

J. M.

Cameron

K. A.

(2003) Accessing, understanding, and applying health communication messages: The challenge of health literacy. In: Thompson

T. L.

Dorsey

A. M.

Miller

K. I.

Parrott

(eds) Handbook of health communication, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, pp. 583–605.

Brewer

N. T.

Gibbons

F. X.

Gerrard

Chapman

G. B.

McCaul

K. D.

Weinstein

N. D.

(2007) Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology 26: 136–145.

Bujarski

S. J.

Klanecky

A. K.

McChargue

D. E.

(2010) The relationship between alexithymia and alcohol-related risk perceptions: The moderating effect of general trauma in a college population. Addictive Behaviors 35: 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.10.023.

Campo

Cameron

K. A.

(2006) Differential effects of exposure to social norms campaigns: A cause for concern. Health Communication 19: 209–219. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1903_3.

Chaiken

(1980) Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 752–766.

Chen

Feeley

T. H.

(2014) Numeracy, information-seeking and self-efficacy in managing health: An analysis using the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Health Communication 29: 843–853. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.807904.

DeJong

(2002) The role of mass media campaigns in reducing high-risk drinking among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol(Suppl 14): 182–192.

10.

De Wit

J. B. F.

Das

Vet

(2008) What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology 27: 110–115. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.110.

11.

Fagerlin

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Ubel

P. A.

Jankovic

Derry

H. A.

Smith

D. M.

(2007) Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the Subjective Numeracy Scale (SNS). Medical Decision Making 27: 672–680.

12.

Floyd

D. L.

Prentice-Dunn

Rogers

R. W.

(2000) A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30: 407–429. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x.

13.

Galesic

Garcia-Retamero

(2011) Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Medical Decision Making 31: 444–457. doi:10.1177/0272989x10373805.

14.

Garcia-Retamero

Galesic

(2010) Who profits from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Social Science & Medicine 70: 1019–1025. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031.

15.

Hess

Visschers

V. H. M.

Siegrist

Keller

(2011) How do people perceive graphical risk communication? The role of subjective numeracy. Journal of Risk Research 14: 47–61. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.488745.

16.

Huchting

Lac

LaBrie

(2008) An application of the theory of planned behavior to sorority alcohol consumption. Addictive Behaviors 33: 538–551.

17.

Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975--2010: Volume II, college students and adults ages (pp. 19--50). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-vol2_2010.pdf.

18.

Karlsson

(2008) Explaining small effects of information-based drug prevention: The importance of considering preintervention levels in risk perceptions. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education 52: 9–17.

19.

Keller

Siegrist

Visschers

(2009) Effect of risk ladder format on risk perception in high- and low-numerate individuals. Risk Analysis 29: 1255–1264. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01261.x.

20.

Klein

Geaghan

MacDonald

(2007) Unplanned sexual activity as a consequence of alcohol use: A prospective study of risk perceptions and alcohol use among college freshmen. Journal of American College Health 56: 317–323.

21.

Lipkus

I. M.

Samsa

Rimer

B. K.

(2001) General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making 21: 37–44.

22.

McCarthy

D. M.

Pedersen

S. L.

Leuty

M. E.

(2005) Negative consequences and cognitions about drinking and driving. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 66: 567–570.

23.

McMath

B. F.

Prentice-Dunn

(2005) Protection motivation theory and skin cancer risk: The role of individual differences in responses to persuasive appeals. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35: 621–643. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02138.x.

24.

Miron-Shatz

Hanoch

Graef

Sagi

(2009) Presentation format affects comprehension and risk assessment: The case of prenatal screening. Journal of Health Communication 14: 439–450. doi:10.1080/10810730903032986.

25.

National Cancer Institute. (2007). Promoting healthy lifestyles: Policy, program, and personal recommendations for reducing cancer risk. 2006–2007 Annual report. President’s cancer panel. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

26.

National Institute on Aging. (2013). Cancer facts for people over 50. Retrived from http://www.nia.nih.gov/health/publication/cancer-facts-people-over-50.

27.

O’Neill

S. C.

McBride

C. M.

Alford

S. H.

Kaphingst

K. A.

(2010) Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: The impact of risk factors and disease attributions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 40: 127–137. doi:10.1007/s12160-010-9197-1.

28.

Peters

Dieckmann

N. F.

Dixon

Hibbard

J. H.

Mertz

C. K.

Slovic

(2007) Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review 64: 169–190.

29.

Reyna

V. F.

Nelson

W. L.

Han

P. K.

Dieckmann

N. F.

(2009) How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin 135: 943–973. doi:10.1037/a0017327.

30.

Richland

L. E.

Stigler

J. W.

Holyoak

K. J.

(2012) Teaching the conceptual structure of mathematics. Educational Psychologist 47: 189–203. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.667065.

31.

Schütze

Boeing

Pischon

Rehm

Kehoe

Gmel

Bergmann

M. M.

(2011) Alcohol attributable burden of incidence of cancer in eight European countries based on results from prospective cohort study. BMJ 342: d1584.

32.

Severtson

D. J.

Henriques

J. B.

(2009) The effect of graphics on environmental health risk beliefs, emotions, behavioral intentions and recall. Risk Analysis 29: 1549–1565. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01299.x.

33.

Sheeran

Harris

Epton

(2014) Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin 140: 511–543.

34.

Smerecnik

C. M. R.

Mesters

Kessels

L. T. E.

Ruiter

R. A. C.

de Vries

N. K.

de Vries

(2010) Understanding the positive effects of graphical risk information on comprehension: Measuring attention directed to written, tabular, and graphical risk information. Risk Analysis 30: 1387–1398. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01435.x.

35.

Strano

D. A.

Cuomo

M. J.

Venable

R. H.

(2004) Predictors of undergraduate student binge drinking. Journal of College Counseling 7: 50–63. doi:10.1002/j.2161-1882.2004.tb00259.x.

36.

Tait

A. R.

Voepel-Lewis

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Fagerlin

(2010) The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: A comparison between text, tables, and graphics. Journal of Health Communication 15: 487–501. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.492560.

37.

Tanius

B. E.

Wood

Hanoch

Rice

(2009) Aging and choice: Applications to Medicare part D. Judgment and Decision Making 4: 92–101.

38.

U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf.

39.

Waters

E. A.

Sullivan

H. W.

Nelson

Hesse

B. W.

(2009) What is my cancer risk? How internet-based cancer risk assessment tools communicate individualized risk estimates to the public: Content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research 11: 1–14. doi:10.2196/jmir.1222.

40.

Wechsler

Lee

J. E.

Kuo

Seibring

Nelson

T. F.

Lee

(2002) Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Finding from four Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys 1993. 2001. Journal of American College Health 50: 203–217.

41.

Weinstein

N. D.

(2000) Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. Health Psychology 19(1): 65–74. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.1.65.

42.

Wright

A. J.

Whitwell

S. C. L.

Takeichi

Hankins

Marteau

T. M.

(2009) The impact of numeracy on reactions to different graphic risk presentation formats: An experimental analogue study. British Journal of Health Psychology 14: 107–125. doi:10.1348/135910708x304432.

43.

Yang

Z. J.

McComas

K. A.

Gay

Leonard

J. P.

Dannenberg

A. J.

Dillon

(2010) Applying the theory of planned behavior to study health decisions related to potential risks. Journal of Risk Research 13: 1007–1026.

44.

Zikmund-Fisher

B. J.

Smith

D. M.

Ubel

P. A.

Fagerlin

(2007) Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making 27: 663–671.