Effects of Case Libraries in Supporting a Problem-Based Learning STEM Course

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) is an instructional strategy that claims to support higher order learning as students attempt to resolve ill-structured problems. However, the research is somewhat mixed as to its efficacy. Some suggest that further investigation is needed regarding how students are supported in PBL, while others argue that scaffolds may overscript the inquiry process. Based on this research gap, an experimental study was conducted to investigate the effects of case libraries in supporting PBL. Biology students (N = 95) were assigned to two different conditions (case library and unsupported group) as they resolved an ill-structured science problem. Research revealed statistically significant differences in the number of correctly identified solutions, supporting evidence, and solutions proposed for participants in the case library condition. Implications for practice are discussed.

Keywords

problem-based learning case-based reasoning STEM education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aamodt, A., & Plaza, E. (1996). Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and systems approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7(1), 39–59.

Andrews

Hull

Donahue

(2009) Storytelling as an instructional method: Definitions and research questions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3(2): 6–23. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1063.

Asghar

Ellington

Rice

Johnson

Prime

(2012) Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 6(2): 85–125. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1349.

Barnett

S. M.

Ceci

S. J.

(2002) When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin 128(4): 612–637. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612.

Barrows

(1996) Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 68: 3–12.

Boshuizen

H. P. A.

Wiel

M. W. J.

Schmidt

H. G.

(2012) What and how advanced medical students learn from reasoning through multiple cases. Instructional Science 40(5): 755–768. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9211-z.

Capon

Kuhn

(2004) What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction 22(1): 61–79.

Dasgupta

Kolodner

J. L.

(2009) Designing case libraries to encourage creative design. Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on creativity and cognition, New York, NY: ACM, pp. 361–362. doi:10.1145/1640233.1640301.

Dixon

R. A.

Brown

R. A.

(2012) Transfer of learning: Connecting concepts during problem solving. Journal of Technology Education 24(1): 2–17.

10.

Ertmer

Simons

K. D.

(2006) Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 teachers. Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1(1): 40–54.

11.

Fitzgerald

Mitchem

Hollingsead

Miller

Koury

Tsai

H.-H.

(2011) Exploring the bridge from multimedia cases to classrooms: Evidence of transfer. Journal of Special Education Technology 26(2): 23–38.

12.

Land

(2003) Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development 51(1): 21–38.

13.

Planas

(2010) A cognitive support system to scaffold students’ problem-based learning in a web-based learning environment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 4(1): 30–56. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1093.

14.

Gentner

Colhoun

(2010) Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In: Glatzeder

Goel

Müller

(eds) Towards a theory of thinking, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 35–48. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/q6kh212518601624/.

15.

Gick

M. L.

Holyoak

(1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15(1): 1–38. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6.

16.

Hara

(2008) Communities of practice: Fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the work place, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

17.

Henning

(2004) Everyday cognition and situated learning. In: Jonassen

D. H.

(eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: A project of the association for educational communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 829–861.

18.

Henry

Tawfik

Jonassen

D. H.

Winholtz

Khanna

(2012) “I know this is supposed to be more like the real world, but …”: Student perceptions of a PBL implementation in an undergraduate materials science course. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 6(1): 43–81. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1312.

19.

Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). The effects of case libraries on problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 103–114.

20.

Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

(2004) Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review 16(3): 235–266.

21.

Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

Barrows

(2006) Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1(1): 21–39. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1004.

22.

Hmelo-Silver

C. E.

Duncan

R. G.

Chinn

(2007) Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist 42(2): 99–107. doi:10.1080/00461520701263368.

23.

Hung

(2006) The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1(1): 55–57. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1006.

24.

Hung

(2011) Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development 59: 529–552. doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9198-1.

25.

Jeong, A. C., & Lee, J. (2008). The effects of active versus reflective learning style on the processes of critical discourse in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(4), 651–665.

26.

Jonassen

D. H.

(2011a) Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments, 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.

27.

Jonassen

D. H.

(2011b) Supporting problem solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 5(2): 95–110. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1256.

28.

Jonassen

D. H.

Cho

(2011) Fostering argumentation while solving engineering ethics problems. Journal of Engineering Education 100(4): 680–702.

29.

Kearns, S. K., & Sutton, J. E. (2012). Hangar talk survey: Using stories as a naturalistic method of informing threat and error management training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812452127.

30.

Kim

Hannafin

M. J.

(2008) Grounded design of web-enhanced case-based activity. Educational Technology Research and Development 56(2): 161–179.

31.

Kim

Hannafin

M. J.

(2009) Web-enhanced case-based activity in teacher education: A case study. Instructional Science 37(2): 151–170. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9040-7.

32.

Kirschner

Sweller

Clark

(2006) Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2): 75–86.

33.

Klein, G. A., & Calderwood, R. (1988). How do people use analogs to make decisions? In J. L. Kolodner (Ed.), Proceedings: Workshop on Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann.

34.

Kolodner

J. L.

(1992) An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence Review 6(1): 3–34. doi:10.1007/BF00155578.

35.

Kolodner

J. L.

Cox

Gonzalez-Calero

(2005) Case-based reasoning-inspired approaches to education. The Knowledge Engineering Review 20(03): 299–303. doi:10.1017/S0269888906000634.

36.

Kolodner

J. L.

Owensby

Guzdial

(2004) Case-based learning aids. In: Jonassen

D. H.

37.

Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319–337. http://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306.

38.

Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2007). Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(2), 90–104.

39.

Kurtz

K. J.

Loewenstein

(2007) Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition 35(2): 334–341. doi:10.3758/BF03193454.

40.

McCrudden

M. T.

Schraw

Lehman

Poliquin

(2007) The effect of causal diagrams on text learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology 32(3): 367–388. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.11.002.

41.

Nasr

Ramadan

(2008) Impact assessment of problem-based learning in an engineering science course. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research 9(3): 16–24.

42.

Rourke

Anderson

Garrison

D. R.

Archer

(2001) Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED) 12: 8–22.

43.

Savery

(2006) Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 1(1): 9–20. Retrieved from http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol1/iss1/3.

44.

Savery

Duffy

T. M.

(1996) Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology 35(5): 31–38.

45.

Schank

(1999) Dynamic memory revisited, 2nd ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Schank

Berman

Macpherson

(1999) Learning by doing. In: Reigeluth

C. M.

(eds) Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 1st ed., Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 241–261.

47.

Schank

Fano

Bell

Jona

(1993) The design of goal-based scenarios. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3(4): 305–345.

48.

Schmidt

H. G.

Rikers

R. M. J. P.

(2007) How expertise develops in medicine: Knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education 41(12): 1133–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x.

49.

Strobel

van Barneveld

(2009) When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3(1): 44–58.

50.

Tawfik

A. A.

Jonassen

D. H.

(2013) The effects of successful versus failure-based cases on argumentation while solving decision-making problems. Educational Technology Research and Development 61(3): 385–406. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9294-5.

51.

Tessmer

Richey

(1997) The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development 45(2): 85–115. doi:10.1007/BF02299526.

52.

Toff

(2010) Human factors in anaesthesia: Lessons from aviation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 105(1): 21–25.

53.

Vardi

Ciccarelli

(2008) Overcoming problems in problem-based learning: A trial of strategies in an undergraduate unit. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 45(4): 345–354. doi:10.1080/14703290802377190.

54.

Walker

Leary

Walker

(2009) A problem based learning meta analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning 3(1): 6–28.