The Roles of Technical Communication Researchers in Design Scholarship

Abstract

Design has come to be understood as an essential aspect of the work that technical communicators claim. As a result, research in the field of technical communication has approached studies of design in numerous ways. This article showcases how technical communication researchers assume the roles of observers, testers, critics, creators, and consultants in their handling of design artifacts. Such a model regarding these roles may help us to better understand the design relationships researchers presume as they further knowledge of design within our field. This article offers a framework to leverage into a comprehensive and integrated model for explaining our work on design to others outside of technical communication.

Keywords

research in technical communication design research design disciplinarity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agboka

G. Y.

(2013) Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly 22(1): 28–49. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.730966.

Albers

M. J.

(2009) Design for effective support of user intentions in information-rich interactions. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 39(2): 177–194. doi:10.2190/TW.39.2.d.

Albers

M. J.

(2011) Design and usability: Beginner interactions with complex software. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 41(3): 271–287. doi:10.2190/TW.41.3.d.

Andrews

Burleson

Dunks

Elmore

Lambert

C. S.

Oppegaard

Zobel

(2012) A new method in user-centered design: Collaborative prototype design process (CPDP). Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 42(2): 123–142. 2012. doi:10.2190/TW.42.2.c.

Artemeva

Freedman

(2001) “Just the boys playing on computers:” An activity theory analysis of differences in the cultures of two engineering firms. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15(2): 164–194.

Bacha

J. A.

(2012) Taxonomies, folksonomies, and semantics: Establishing functional meaning in navigational structures. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 42(3): 249–263. doi:10.2190/TW.42.3.d.

Bellwoar

(2012) Everyday matters: Reception and use as productive design of health-related texts. Technical Communication Quarterly 21(4): 325–345. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.702533.

Blakeslee

A. M.

(2009) The technical communication research landscape. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(2): 129–173.

Blakeslee

A. M.

Spilka

(2004) The state of research in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 13(1): 73–92.

10.

Brasseur

(2005) Florence Nightingale's visual rhetoric in the rose diagrams. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(2): 161–182. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1402_3.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

12.

Brumberger

(2007) Visual communication in the workplace: A survey of practice. Technical Communication Quarterly 16(4): 369–395. doi:10.1080/10572250701380725.

13.

Carliner

(2000) Taking cues from the culture: The case of Network Earth. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14(3): 264–288.

14.

Catanio

J. T.

Catanio

T. L.

(2010) The effects of integrating on-going training for technical documentation teams. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 40(1): 77–97. doi:10.2190/TW.40.1.e.

15.

Clark

(2007) Content management and the separation of presentation and content. Technical Communication Quarterly 17(1): 35–60. doi:10.1080/10572250701588624.

16.

Connors

(1982) The rise of technical writing instruction in America. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 12(4): 329–352.

17.

Cooke

(2003) Information acceleration and visual trends in print, television, and web news sources. Technical Communication Quarterly 12(2): 155–182. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1202_2.

18.

Creswell

J. W.

(1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

19.

Cushman

(2014) Our unstable artistry: Donald Schon’s counterprofessional practice of problem setting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 28(3): 327–351. doi:10.1177/1050651914524778.

20.

Dannels

(2009) Features of success in engineering design presentations: A call for relational genre knowledge. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(4): 399–427. doi:10.1177/1050651909338790.

21.

David

(2001) Investitures of power: Portraits of professional women. Technical Communication Quarterly 10(1): 5–29. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1001_1.

22.

de Jong

Lentz

(2001) Focus: Design and evaluation of a software tool for collecting reader feedback. Technical Communication Quarterly 10(4): 387–401. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1004_2.

23.

Ding

(2000) Influence of Burke and Lessing on the semiotic theory of document design: Ideologies and good visual images of documents. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 30(1): 31–47.

24.

Friess

(2010) Designing from data: Rhetorical appeals in support of design decisions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24(4): 403–444. doi:10.1177/1050651910371197.

25.

Friess

(2011) Politeness, time constraints, and collaboration in decision-making meetings: A case study. Technical Communication Quarterly 20(2): 114–138. doi:10.1080/10572252.2011.551507.

26.

Gaffney

A. L. H.

(2014) Communication instruction in landscape architecture courses: A model and effects on students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 28(2): 158–186. doi:10.1177/1050651913513903.

27.

Galbraith

McKinney

B. C.

DeNoble

A. F.

Ehrlich

S. B.

(2014) The impact of presentation form, entrepreneurial passion, and perceived preparedness on obtaining grant funding. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 28(2): 222–248. doi:10.1177/1050651913513902.

28.

Ganier

(2009) Observational data on practical experience and conditions of use of written instructions. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 39(4): 401–415. doi:10.2190/TW.39.4.d.

29.

Henson

D. L.

(2005) Using the internet as a tool for public service: Creating a community history web site. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 35(1): 71–94.

30.

Herrera

M. J.

(2013) Toward a definition of information design. 2013 IEEE International Conference Professional Communication Conference (pp. 1–7), Canada. doi:10.1109/IPCC.2013.6623932.

31.

Johnson

C. S.

(2006) A decade of research: assessing change in the technical communication classroom using online portfolios. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 36(4): 413–431.

32.

Johnson

(1998) User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts, Albany: State University of New York Press.

33.

Johnson-Sheehan

Morgan

(2008) Darwin’s dilemma: Science in the public forum. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 38(1): 53–73. doi:10.2190/TW.38.1.d.

34.

Kim

Young

A. J.

Neimeyer

R. A.

Baker

J. N.

Barfield

R. C.

(2008) Keeping users at the center: Developing a multimodal interface for informed consent. Technical Communication Quarterly 17(3): 335–357. doi:10.1080/10572250802100451.

35.

Kimball

M. A.

(2013) Visual design principles: An empirical study of design lore. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 43(1): 3–41. doi:10.2190/TW.43.1b.

36.

Kress

(1999) “English” at the crossroads: Rethinking curricula of communication in the context of the turn to the visual. In: Hawisher

G. E.

(ed.) Passions, pedagogies, and 21st century technologies, Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 66–88.

37.

Lauer

(2013) Examining the effect of reflective assessment on the quality of visual design assignments in the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly 22(2): 172–190. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.757156.

38.

Lauer

Brumberger

Hannah

(2015) Building bridges from writing studies to industry: An investigation of job advertisements in professional writing careers. Presentation at Conference on College Composition and Communication. Tampa, FL.

39.

Lauer

Sanchez

(2011) Visuospatial thinking in the professional writing classroom. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 25(2): 184–218. doi:10.1177/1050651910389149.

40.

Lavid

Taboada

(2004) Stylistic differences in multilingual administrative forms: A cross-linguistic characterization. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 34(1 & 2): 43–65.

41.

Longo

Weinert

Fountain

T. K.

(2007) Implementations of medical research findings through insulin protocols: Initial findings from an ongoing study of document design and visual display. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 37(4): 435–452.

42.

Mackiewicz

(2012) Relying on writing consultants: The design of a WID program for the College of Business. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 26(2): 229–258. doi:10.1177/1050651911429924.

43.

Meyerring

D. S.

(2005) Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 19(4): 468–499. doi:10.1177/1050651905278033.

44.

O’Hara

(2004) “Curb cuts” on the information highway: Older adults and the internet. Technical Communication Quarterly 13(4): 426–445. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1304_4.

45.

Peeples

Hart-Davidson

(2012) Re-mapping technical writing: Articulating the state of the art and composition studies. In: Ritter

Matsuda

P. K.

(eds) Exploring composition studies: Sites, issues, and perspectives, Logan: Utah State University Press, pp. 52–72.

46.

Portewig

T. C.

(2004) Making sense of the visual in technical communication: A visual literacy approach to pedagogy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 34(1): 31–42. doi:10.2190/FGJ6-UETB-9CA6-5PC3.

47.

Potts

Jones

(2011) Contextualizing experiences: Tracing relationships between people and technologies in the social web. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 25(3): 338–358. doi:10.1177/1050651911400839.

48.

Ramey

J. W.

(2014) The coffee planter of Saint Domingo: A technical manual for the Caribbean slave owner. Technical Communication Quarterly 23(2): 141–159. doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.811164.

49.

Rawlins

J. D.

Wilson

G. D.

(2014) Agency and interactive data displays: Internet graphics as co-created rhetorical spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly 23(4): 303–322. doi:10.1080/10572252.2014.942468.

50.

Rice

Ezzy

(1999) Qualitative research methods: A health focus, Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

51.

Richards

A. R.

(2009) Music, transtextuality, and the world wide web. Technical Communication Quarterly 18(2): 188–209. doi:10.1080/10572250802708337.

52.

Rude

C. D.

(2004) Toward an expanded concept of rhetorical delivery: The uses of reports in public policy debates. Technical Communication Quarterly 13(3): 271–288. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1303_3.

53.

Rude

C. D.

(2009) Mapping the research in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(2): 174–215. doi:10.1177/1050651908329562.

54.

Salinas

(2002) Technical rhetoricians and the art of configuring images. Technical Communication Quarterly 11(2): 165–183.

55.

Salvo

M. J.

(2001) Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly 10(3): 273–290. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1003_3.

56.

Salvo

M. J.

Pflugfelder

E. H.

Prenosil

(2010) The children of Aramis. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 40(3): 245–263. doi:10.2190/TW.40.3.b.

57.

Sapienza

(2002) Does being technical matter? XML, single source, and technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 32(2): 155–170.

58.

Sawhney, R., & Prahalad, D. (2010). The role of design in business. Bloomberg business. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2010-02-01/the-role-of-design-in-businessbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice.

59.

Schneider

(2005) Usable pedagogies: Usability, rhetoric, and sociocultural pedagogy in the technical writing classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(4): 447–467. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1404_4.

60.

Scott

J. B.

(2008) The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly 17(4): 381–412. doi:10.1080/10572250802324929.

61.

Sherlock

(2009) Genre, activity, and collaborative work and play in World of Warcraft: Places and problems of open systems in online gaming. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(3): 263–293. doi:10.1177/1050651909333150.

62.

Smart

K. L.

Whiting

M. E.

(2002) Using customer data to drive documentation design decisions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 16(2): 115–169. doi:10.1177/1050651902016002001.

63.

Society for Technical Communication. (n.d.) The profession. Retrieved from http://www.stc.org/about-stc/the-profession-all-about-technical-communication/defining-tc.

64.

Spinuzzi

(2002) Toward integrating our research scope: A sociocultural field methodology. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 16, 1, 3–32. doi:10.1177/1050651902016001001.

65.

St. Amant

(2005) A prototype theory approach to international website analysis and design. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(1): 73–91. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1401_6.

66.

Star

Griesemer

(1989) Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.

67.

Stolley

(2009) Integrating social media into existing work environments: The case of Delicious. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23(3): 350–371. doi:10.1177/1050651909333260.

68.

Sullivan

Porter

(1993) Remapping curricular geography: Professional writing in/and English. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7(4): 389–422.

69.

Sullivan

Porter

(1997) Opening spaces: Writing technologies and critical research practices, Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

70.

Sun

(2006) The triumph of the users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly 15(4): 457–481. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_3.

71.

Tebeaux

(1999) Designing written business communication along the shifting cultural continuum: The new face of Mexico. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 13(1): 49–85. doi:10.1177/105065199901300102.

72.

Tebeaux

(2000) Visual texts: Format and the evolution of English accounting texts, 1100-1700. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 30(4): 307–341.

73.

Tebeaux

(2008) Technical writing in English Renaissance shipwrightery: Breaching the shoals of orality. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 38(1): 3–25. doi:10.2190/TW.38.1.b.

74.

Thatcher

(2001) Issues of validity in intercultural professional communication research. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15(4): 458–489.

75.

Varpio

Spafford

M. M.

Schryer

C. F.

Lingard

(2007) A visual and social analysis of optometric record-keeping practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 21(4): 343–375. doi:10.1177/1050651907303991.

76.

Walker

(2002) Theoretical foundations for website design courses. Technical Communication Quarterly 11(1): 61–83. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1101_3.

77.

Walters

(2010) Toward an accessible pedagogy: Dis/ability, multimodality, and universal design in the technical communication classroom. Technical Communication Quarterly 19(4): 427–454. doi:10.1080/10572252.2010.502090.

78.

Ward

(2010) The ethic of exigence: Information design, postmodern ethics, and the Holocaust. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 24(1): 60–90. doi:10.1177/1050651909346932.

79.

Welch

K. E.

(2005) Technical communication and physical location: Topoi and architecture in computer classrooms. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(3): 335–344. doi:10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_12.

80.

Wenger

(1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

81.

Wickman

(2014) Wicked problems in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 44(1): 23–42. doi:10.2190/TW.44.1.c.

82.

Willerton

Hereford

(2011) Evaluating applications for an informal approach to information design: Readers respond to three articles about nursing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 41(1): 59–82. doi:10.2190/TW.41.1.d.

83.

Williams

(2010) Interpretive discourse and other models from communication studies: Expanding the values of technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 40(4): 429–446. doi:10.2190/TW.40.4.d.

84.

Wolfe

J. L.

Neuwirth

C. M.

(2001) From the margins to the center: The future of annotation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15(3): 333–371.

85.

Wright

(2012) Redesigning informed consent tools for specific research. Technical Communication Quarterly 21(2): 145–167. doi:10.1080/10572252.2012.641432.

86.

Youngblood

(2013) Communicating web accessibility to the novice developer: From user experience to application. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 27(2): 209–232. doi:10.1177/1050651912458924.

87.

Zdenek

(2007) “Just roll your mouse over me”: Designing virtual women for customer service on the Web. Technical Communication Quarterly 16(4): 397–430. doi:10.1080/10572250701380766.