Technical Implications for the Hidden Violence of Neutral Language

Abstract

Many collections of keyword essays include the term technology, but less attention has been paid to the genealogy of the word technical. Because it is often used to describe specialized knowledge, the term can also imply a separation between knowledges. This essay reviews the Oxford English Dictionary alongside several keyword collections to show how the word technical is a marker of division between binary knowledge formations, in particular, specialized/general, theory/practice, and mind/body. This distinction, I argue, makes possible political renderings of the term that can hide violence within what is often considered to be neutral language.

Keywords

dictionary political discourse violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Reiss

Serlin

(Eds). (2015). Keywords for disability studies. NYU Press.

Altschuler

., Metzl

J. M

., & Wald

. (Eds.). (2023). Keywords for health humanities. NYU Press.

Bartha

(2020). Skill. In Burgett

Hendler

(Eds.), Keywords for American cultural studies. NYU Press. https://keywords.nyupress.org/american-cultural-studies/essay/skill/

Barthes

(1988). The semiotic challenge. Hill & Wang.

Basl

Sandler

(2023). Technology. In Altschuler

Metzl

J. M.

Wald

(Eds.), Keywords for health humanities (pp. 199–202). NYU Press.

BP. (2022). UN Global Compact communication on progress. UN Global Compact. https://unglobalcompact.org/participation/report/cop/active/444496

Burgett

Hendler

(Eds). (2014/2020). Keywords for American cultural studies. NYU Press.

Foucault

(1991). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. Semiotext(e).

Foucault

(1994). The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences. Vintage Books Edition, 1994. (Original work published 1970)

10.

Foucault

(2010). The Archaeology of knowledge: And the discourse on language. Vintage Books Edition, 2010. (Original work published 1972)

11.

Heilker

Vandenberg

(Eds). (2015). Keywords in writing studies. University of Colorado Press.

12.

hooks

(1994). Teaching to Transgress. Routledge.

13.

Horkheimer

Adorno

T. W.

(2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press.

14.

Information. (2016). Keywords project. University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved from https://keywords.pitt.edu/keywords_defined/information.html

15.

Johnson-Eilola

Selber

(2015). Technology. In Heilker

Vandenberg

(Eds.), Keywords in writing studies (pp. 169–172). University of Colorado Press.

16.

Jones

N. N.

Sackey

D. J.

(2025). Cop city counternarratives: Security logics, sociotechnical environments, and marginalized communities. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, First published online Oct 21, 2025, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816251384907

17.

Katz

S. B.

(1992). The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the holocaust. College English, 54(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/378062

18.

Knoblauch

A. A.

Moeller

M. E.

(Eds). (2022). Bodies of knowledge: Embodied rhetorics in theory and practice. Utah State University Press.

19.

Longo

(2023). Technology. In Yu

Buehl

(Eds.), Keywords in technical and professional communication (pp. 297–302). WAC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2023.1923.2.36

20.

MacDonald

M. T.

(2025). Communicating global governmentality: The united nations global compact, BP, and the implicit violence of human rights discourse. Technical Communication Quarterly, 34(2), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2024.2394999

21.

McKenna

B. J.

Graham

(2000). Technocratic discourse: A primer. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 30(3), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.2190/56FY-V5TH-2U3U-MHQ

22.

Mills

(2015). Technology. In Adams

Reiss

Serlin

(Eds.), Keywords for disability studies (pp. 176–179). NYU Press.

23.

Orwell

(1946/n.d.). Politics and the English language. The Orwell Foundation https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/politics-and-the-english-language/ (Original work published in Horizon, 1946)

24.

Ouellette

Gray

(Eds). (2017). Keywords for media studies. NYU Press.

25.

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Technical. Oxford English dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/3602518120

26.

Parry

(2024). Episteme and techne. In Zalta

E. N.

Nodelman

(Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2024/entries/episteme-techne/

27.

Rude

(2015). Technical communication. In Heilker

Vandenberg

(Eds.), Keywords in writing studies (pp. 165–168). University of Colorado Press.

28.

Sayers

(2014). Technology. In Burgett

Hendler

(Eds.), Keywords for American cultural studies (pp. 235–239). NYU Press.

29.

Slack

J. D.

(2017). Technology. In Ouellette

Gray

(Eds.), Keywords for media studies (pp. 191–193). NYU Press.

30.

Strickland

(2001). Taking dictation: The emergence of writing programs and the cultural contradictions of composition teaching. College English, 63(4), 457–479. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/378890 https://doi.org/10.58680/ce20011217

31.

UN Global Compact strategy 2021–2023 . (2021). United Nations Global Compact. https://unglobalcompact.org/library/5869

32.

University of Pittsburgh. (2016). Information. Keywords Project. https://keywords.pitt.edu/keywords_defined/information.html

33.

Walton

Moore

Jones

(2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. Routledge.

34.

Williams

(1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (revised edition). Oxford University Press.

35.

Winner

(1989). The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of technology. University of Chicago Press.

36.

Buehl

(Eds.). (2023) Keywords in technical and professional communication. WAC Clearinghouse. https://wacclearinghouse.org/books/tpc/tpc/