The Sonic Aesthetics of Science Communication Podcasts

Abstract

The sonic aesthetics of technical communication have been underconsidered compared to their visual and textual counterparts. We highlight the aesthetic overlaps and contrasts between human-produced audio technical communication and Generative AI audio that mimics the aesthetic patterns of successful science communication podcasts, specifically Radiolab, while exploring the sonic dimensions of ethos, relatability, trust, and narrative. Applying close listening analysis, we explore two particular sonic aesthetic features: prosodic variation and shared conversational syntax. We argue prosodic range and shared syntax contribute to the aesthetics of either overarching agreeableness/certainty or confrontation/uncertainty, which in turn constitutes an orientation to scientific knowledge.

Keywords

audio technical communication science communication podcasts sonic rhetorics AI

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilar

G. L.

(2025). AI Writing is always embodied: Building a critical awareness of the invisible labor of humans-in-the-loop in AI products. College Composition & Communication, 77(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202577139

Anderson

(2014). Toward a resonant material vocality for digital composition. enculturation: a journal of rhetoric, writing, and culture, 18. http://enculturation.net/materialvocality.

Angeli

E. L.

(2024). Responding through listening: Promoting listening skills through lightning talks and 2 × 2 × 2 storytelling. Journal of Response to Writing, 10(2), Article 3. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol10/iss2/3 .

Ask Science. (2025, May 4). “The Secret Science of Fruit Ripening” [Audio podcast episode] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-secret-science-of-fruit-ripening-why-some/id1797350244?i=1000706022258.

Banihashemi

Shahriary

Yaghoobzadeh

(2025). Human vs NotebookLM for educational podcasts: A controlled experiment on two general topics. Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Knowledge Engineering (ICCKE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCKE68588.2025.11273844

Barton

B. F.

Barton

M. S.

(1988). Narration in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065198800200103

Bathaee

(2018). The artificial intelligence black box and the failure of intent and causation. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard JOLT), 31(2), 889–938.

Beckstead

Cook

I. M.

McGregor

(2024). Podcast or perish: Peer review and knowledge creation for the 21st century. Bloomsbury.

Bjork

(2021). “Narration.” PodUni. https://www.collinbjork.com/poduni.html https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/poduni/episodes/5–Narration-er77q2 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003249184

10.

Bjork

(2025). True crime podcasting and technical communication: Exposing the oppression of objectivity. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2025.2455058. Advance online publication.

11.

Blevins

(2019). Sound strategies for sonic literacy. In Sabatino

L. A.

Fallon

(Eds.), Multimodal composing: Strategies for twenty-first-century writing consultations (pp. 140–152). Utah State University Press.

12.

Bowie

(2012). Rhetorical roots and media future: How podcasting fits into the computers and writing classroom. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 16(2), http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/16.2/topoi/bowie/index.html .

13.

Carusi

(2008). Scientific visualisations and aesthetic grounds for trust. Ethics and Information Technology, 10, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-008-9159-5

14.

Ceraso

(2014). (Re)educating the senses: Multimodal listening, bodily learning, and the composition of sonic experiences. College English, 77(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce201426145

15.

Cicchino

(2020). Sound-Mapping: Seeing the Rhetorical Choices in Podcasts Crowdsourcing with CCDP https://ccdigitalpress.org/blog/crowdsourcing-with-ccdp.

16.

Clarke

Bjork

(2023). ‘Listening closely’ to mediated intimacies and podcast intimacies in song exploder. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 29(4), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231160886. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13548565231160886

17.

Detweiler

(2021). The bandwidth of podcasting. In Stedman

K. D.

Danforth

C. S.

Faris

M. J.

(Eds.), Tuning in to soundwriting. Intermezzo. https://intermezzo.enculturation.net/14-stedman-et-al/detweiler.html .

18.

T. D.

Shafqat

U. B.

Ling

Sarda

(2025). PAIGE: Examining learning outcomes and experiences with personalized AI-generated educational podcasts. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713460

19.

Droumeva

Murphy

(2018). A pedagogy of listening: Composing with/in media texts. In Danforth

C. S.

Stedman

K. D.

Faris

M. J.

(Eds.), Soundwriting pedagogies. Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. http://ccdigitalpress.org/soundwriting .

20.

Eberly

R. A.

(2025). Harry shearer’s Le show: Sonic hyperlinks of public memory. Resonance, 6(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/res.2025.6.1.80

21.

Eckstein

(2017). Radiolab’s sound strategic maneuvers. Argumentation, 31(4), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-016-9416-4

22.

Eckstein

(2018). The acoustics of argumentation and advocacy. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54(4), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2018.1525012

23.

Edwards

(2025). Weathering the rhetorical climates of AI. College Composition & Communication, 77(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc202577113

24.

Fjellro

(2025). Vocal stories: The sound of narrative in podcasts. In Benestad Hågvar

Hornmoen

Alnæs

(Eds.), Narrative theory in journalistic practice: Understanding emerging digital genres (pp. 81–95). Routledge.

25.

Hardesty

K. S.

Hollinger

(2020). Uncommonly common: Reconsidering creativity and beauty in technical communication. Technical Communication, 67(4), 28–48. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/27340193

26.

Hoffman

(2021). Close listening: Approaches to research on colonial sound archives. In Bull

Cobussen

(Eds.), The bloomsbury handbook of sonic methodologies (pp. 529–542). Bloomsbury Publishing.

27.

Husein

Saive

Jordan

Bertoni

M. I.

(2019). Podcasts: An under-utilized form of science communication. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 46th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2464–2466. https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980967

28.

Ishizaki

(2011). A model of aesthetic experience. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087208

29.

Jones

N. N.

Walton

(2018). Using narratives to foster critical thinking about diversity and social justice. In Haas

A. M.

Eble

M. F.

(Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 241–267). Utah State University Press.

30.

Jordan

L. S.

Sauberer

P. G.

Wolgemuth

J. R.

(2025). The sound of science: Exploring generative AI podcasts for qualitative health research translation. Qualitative Health Research, 36, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251375410. Advance online publication.

31.

Juslin

P. N.

Scherer

K. R.

(2008). Vocal expression of affect. In Harrigan

J. A.

Rosenthal

Scherer

K. R.

(Eds.), The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 65–135). Oxford University Press.

32.

Kant

(1952). Critique of judgement. Trans. J .C. Meredith. Clarendon Press.

33.

Kišiček

(2018). Persuasive power of prosodic features. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54(4), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2019.1525003

34.

Kjeldsen

J. E.

(2018). The rhetoric of sound, the sound of arguments. Three propositions, three questions, and an afterthought for the study of sonic and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 54(4), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2018.1525013

35.

Knight

(2013). Reclaiming experience: The aesthetic and multimodal composition. Computers and Composition, 30(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.04.004

36.

Kostelnick

(1995). Cultural adaptation and information design: Two contrasting views. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38(4), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1109/47.475590

37.

Kostelnick

(2020). The art of visual design. Technical Communication, 67(4), 6–27. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/27340192

38.

Listen Notes. (2025). High-quality podcast database by Listen Notes: Authentic, human-crafted podcasts, not AI-generated junk. Listen Notes Help Center https://www.listennotes.help/article/105-high-quality-podcast-database-from-listen-notes.

39.

Malik

(2025, September 3). Google’s NotebookLM now lets you customize the tone of its AI podcasts. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2025/09/03/googles-notebooklm-now-lets-you-customize-the-tone-of-its-ai-podcasts/.

40.

McKee

(2006). Sound matters: Notes toward the analysis and design of sound in multimodal webtexts. Computers and Composition, 23(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2006.06.003

41.

Ogden

(2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.011

42.

Pettman

(2017). Sonic intimacy: Voice, species, technics (or, how to listen to the world). Stanford University Press.

43.

Radiolab. (2010, Dec. 14). “The Good Show.” [Audio podcast episode] https://radiolab.org/podcast/103951-the-good-show.

44.

Radiolab. (2018, Mar. 15). “Rippin’ the Rainbow an Even Newer One.” [Audio podcast episode] https://radiolab.org/podcast/rippin-the-rainbow-an-even-newer-one.

45.

Radiolab. (2024, Jan. 24). “Zoozve.” [Audio podcast episode] https://radiolab.org/podcast/zoozve.

46.

Radiolab. (2025, Jan. 31). “Forever Fresh” [Audio podcast episode] https://radiolab.org/podcast/forever-fresh.

47.

Radiolab. (n.d.). YouTube channel description https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaum_fMDGgFQCmKHUBPq_xg/about.

48.

Sano-Franchini

(2025). Timely, (un)Disciplinary, and solutions-oriented: On the affective politics of writing technologies and where we might go from here. [2025 CCCC chair’s address]. College Composition & Communication, 77(2), 348–368. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc2025772348

49.

Schulze

(2021). Sonic writing. In Bull

Cobussen

(Eds.), The bloomsbury handbook of sonic methodologies (pp. 659–670). Bloomsbury.

50.

Science Unveiled. (2025, February 17). “The Pluto-Neptune Illusion: Why a Cosmic Collison is Impossible.” [Audio podcast episode] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-pluto-neptune-illusion-why-a-cosmic-collision/id1796126650?i=1000693010777.

51.

Selfe

C. L.

(2009). The movement of air, the breath of meaning: Aurality and multimodal composing. College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 616–663. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20097190

52.

Sharma

Tong

Korbak

Duvenaud

Askell

Bowman

S. R.

Perez

(2023). Towards understanding sycophancy in language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13548. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.13548.

53.

Simply Science. (2024). “Colors of the Noise Explained” [Audio podcast episode] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/colors-of-the-noise-explained/id1775496722?i=1000674734878.

54.

Slater

Rosselot-Merritt

(2024). The technical communicator as artist: Rhetoric, aesthetics, and form in the workplace. Technical Communication, 71(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.55177/tc547418

55.

Spinelli

Dann

(2019). Podcasting: The audio media revolution. Bloomsbury Publishing.

56.

Sterne

Morris

Baker

M. B.

Freire

A. M.

(2008). The politics of podcasting. The Fibreculture Journal, 13, http://thirteen.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-087-the-politics-of-podcasting/ .

57.

Sun

Wang

(2026, April). Be friendly, not friends: How LLM sycophancy shapes user trust. Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.10844

58.

Swiatek

(2018). The podcast as an intimate bridging medium. In Llinares

Fox

Berry

(Eds.), Podcasting: New aural cultures and digital media (pp. 173–187). Springer International Publishing.

59.

The Dead Scientists Podcast. (2024, October 28). “Instincts in Evolution: Darwin on Natural Selection and Behavior” [Audio podcast episode] https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/instincts-in-evolution-darwin-on-natural-selection/id1772000303?i=1000674811859.

60.

Truesdale

D. M.

Pell

M. D.

(2018). The sound of passion and indifference. Speech Communication, 99, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.03.007

61.

Vealey

Gerding

(2021). Introduction to the special issue: “the work of storytelling in technical communication”. Technical Communication, 68(4), 1–6. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/27340322

62.

Weidman

(2015). Voice. In Novak

Sakakeeny

(Eds.), Keywords in sound (pp. 323–345). Duke University Press.

63.

Welhausen

C. A.

(2018). Toward a topos of visual rhetoric: Teaching aesthetics through color and typography. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 48(2), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616646752

64.

Wright

(2019). Sounding off: Toward a rhetoric of sound in technical communication. Technical Communication, 66(4), 363–374. https://www-jstor-org-443.web.bisu.edu.cn/stable/27303388