The article adopts a discrete choice modeling methodology with a focus on capturing systematic heterogeneity to evaluate tourists’ preferences for two Greek heritage attractions. This methodology provides useful insights on the preferences of tourists belonging in different demand segments while also providing direction for future policy making in this area. The article presents empirical justification for the frequently cited argument for adopting a more customer-oriented rationale for the optimal use of heritage resources. Overall, the article supports the claim that tourists value positively the introduction of services and amenities that improve the quality of customer service. Thus, policy makers and heritage managers should pay more attention to visitors’ needs and their particular requirements.
Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere (1998). “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 64-75.
2.
Andriotis, K. (2001). “Tourism Planning and Development in Crete: Recent Tourism Policies and Their Efficacy.”Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9 (4): 298-316.
3.
Apostolakis, A. (2003). “The Convergence Process in Heritage Tourism.”Annals of Tourism Research, 30 (4): 795-812.
4.
Bennett, J. W. (1999). “Some Fundamentals of Environmental Choice Modeling.” Choice Modeling Reports, Research Report no. 11, School of Economics and Management, University College, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia
5.
Bhat, C. (1998). “Accommodating Variations in Travel in Responsiveness to Level of Service Measures in Travel Choice Modeling.”Transportation Research A, 32 (7): 495-507.
6.
Bishop, R. C., and D. Romano, eds. (1998). Environmental Resource Valuation: Applications of the Contingent Valuation Method in Italy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
7.
Blamey, R., J. Gordon, and R. Chapman (1999). “Choice Modeling: Assessing the Environmental Values of Water Supply Options.”Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 43: 337-357.
8.
Boxall, P., and W. Adamowicz (1999). “Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis.” Staff paper, Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
9.
Boxall, P., J. Englin, and W. L. Adamowicz (2003). “Valuing Aboriginal Artefacts: A Combined Revealed-Stated Preference Approach.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45: 213-230.
10.
Breffle, W., and E. Morey (2000). “Investigating Preference Heterogeneity in a Repeated Discrete-Choice Recreation Demand Model of Atlantic Salmon Fishing.”Marine Resource Economics, 15: 1-20.
11.
Burnett, A., and J. Reeve (2001). “Behind the Scenes at the British Museum.”London: British Museum Press.
12.
Chang, T., S. Millne, D. Fallon, and C. Pohlmann (1996). “Urban Heritage Tourism: The Global-Local Nexus.”Annals of Tourism Research, 23 (2): 284-305.
13.
Costa, P., and M. Manente (1995). “Venice and Its Visitors: A Survey and a Model of Qualitative Choice.”Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 4: 45-69.
14.
Dellaert, B., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans (1995). “A Day in the City: Using Conjoint Choice Experiments to Model Urban Tourists’ Choice of Activity Packages.”Tourism Management, 16 (3): 347-353.
15.
Dellaert, B., and K. Lindberg (2003). “Variations in Tourist Price Sensitivity: A Stated Preference Model to Capture the Joint Impact of Differences in Systematic Utility and Response Consistency.”Leisure Sciences, 25: 81-96.
16.
Earnhart, D. (2001). “Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods to Value Environmental Amenities at Residential Locations.”Land Economics, 77: 12-29.
17.
Garrod, B., A. Fyall, and A. Leask (2002). “Scottish Visitor Attractions: Managing Visitor Impacts.”Tourism Management, 23: 265-279.
18.
Hanley, N., G. Koop, R. Wright, and B. Alvarez-Farizo (2001). “Go Climb a Mountain: An Application of Recreational Demand Models to Rock Climbing.”Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52 (1): 36-51.
19.
Hanley, N., S. Mourato, and R. E. Wright (1999). “Choice Modeling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuation?” Plenary paper, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists’ Conference, Oslo, Norway, June.
20.
Huybers, T., and J. Bennett (2000). “Impact of the Environment on Holiday Destination Choices of Prospective UK Tourists: Implications for Tropical North Queensland.”Tourism Economics, 6: 21-46.
21.
Kalogeropoulou, H. (1996). “Cultural Tourism in Greece.” In Cultural Tourism in Europe, edited by G. Richards. Wallingford, CT: CAB International, pp. 183-195.
22.
Laarman, J., and H. Gregersen (1996). “Pricing Policy in Nature-Based Tourism.”Tourism Management, 17 (4): 247-254.
23.
Lancaster, K. (1966). “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.”Journal of Political Economy, 74: 132-157.
24.
Lindberg, K., B. G. Dellaert, and C. R. Rassing (1997). “Resident Tradeoffs: A Choice Modeling Approach.”Annals of Tourism Research26: 554-569.
25.
Louviere, J., and D. Hensher (1983). “Using Discrete Choice Models with Experimental Design Data to Forecast Consumer Demand for a Unique Cultural Event.”Journal of Consumer Research, 10: 348-361.
26.
Maddison, D., and T. Foster (2003). “Valuing Congestion Costs in the British Museum.”Oxford Economic Papers, 55: 173-190.
27.
Maggi, M. (2000). “Innovation in Italy: The a.muse Project.”Museum International, 52 (2): 50-53.
28.
Mazzanti, M. (2001). “Valuing Cultural Heritage in a Multi-Attribute Framework: Microeconomic Perspectives and Policy Implications.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Italian Society of Public Economics (SIEP) on Discrete Choice Models and Valuation Experiments: An Application to Cultural Heritage, Pavia, Italy, October 5-6.
29.
Mazzanti, M. (2002). “Cultural Heritage as Multi-Dimensional, Multi-Value and Multi-Attribute Economic Good: Towards a New Framework for Economic Analysis and Valuation.”Journal of Socio-Economics, 31: 529-558.
30.
McFadden, D. (1974). “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105-142.
31.
McFadden, D. (1986). “The Choice Theory Approach.”Marketing Science, 5: 275-297.
32.
McWilliams, E., and J. Crompton (1997). “An Expanded Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Destination Advertising.”Tourism Management, 18 (3): 127-137.
33.
Morey, E., K. G. Rossmann, L. G. Chestnut, and S. Ragland (2002). “Valuing Reduced Acid Deposition Injuries to Cultural Resources: Marble Monuments in Washington DC.” In Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts, edited by S. Navrud and R. Ready. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 159-183.
34.
Morley, C. (1992). “A Microeconomic Theory of International Tourism Demand.”Annals of Tourism Research, 19: 250-267.
35.
National Statistical Service of Greece (NSSG) (2003). Tourism Statistics 2002-2003. Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece.
36.
Navrud, S., and R. Ready, eds. (2002). Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
37.
Papatheodorou, A. (2001). “Why People Travel to Different Places.”Annals of Tourism Research, 28: 164-179.
38.
Poon, A. (1994). Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies. Oxford: CAB International
39.
Prentice, R. (2001). “Experiential Cultural Tourism: Museums and the Marketing of the New Romanticism of Evoked Authenticity.”Museum Management and Curatorship19 (1): 5-26.
40.
Prentice, R., A. Davies, and A. Beeho (1997). “Seeking Generic Motivations for Visiting and Not Visiting Museums and Like Cultural Attractions.”Museum Management and Curatorship, 16 (1): 45-70.
41.
Region of Crete (1995). “Regional Entrepreneurial Programme (PEP) 1994-1999” (in Greek). Unpublished report. Heraklion, Greece: Region of Crete.
42.
Richards, G. (1996). Cultural Tourism in Europe. Wallingford: CAB International.
43.
Rolfe, J., J. Bennett, and J. Louviere (2000). “Choice Modeling and Its Potential Application to Tropical Rainforest Preservation.”Ecological Economics, 35: 289-302.
44.
Ryan, M., and S. Wordsworth (2000). “Sensitivity of Willingness to Pay Estimates to the Levels of Attributes in Discrete Choice Experiments.”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 47 (5): 504-524.
45.
Sickle, K., and P. Eagles (1998). “Budgets, Pricing Policies and User Fees in Canadian Parks’ Tourism.”Tourism Management19 (3): 225-235.
46.
Silberberg, T. (1995). “Cultural Tourism and Business Opportunities for Museums and Heritage Sites.”Tourism Management, 16: 361-365.
47.
Steenkamp, J. (2001). “The Role of National Culture in International Marketing Research.”International Marketing Review, 18 (1): 30-44.
48.
Taplin, J., and C. McGinley (2000). “A Linear Program to Model Daily Car Tourism Choices.”Annals of Tourism Research, 27 (2): 451-467.
49.
Tufts, S., and S. Millne (1999). “Museums: A Supply Side Perspective.”Annals of Tourism Research, 26: 613-631.
50.
Urry, J. (1995). Consuming Places. London: Routledge.
