The Interaction Effect of Service Robot Affordances and Contexts on Customer Engagement Behaviors

Abstract

Chinese

Service robots are widely used in the tourism and hospitality industry to attract and engage customers. Despite previous research examining the impacts of service robots from a technological perspective, there is insufficient analysis of how robots’ affordances influence customers’ engagement behaviors. This research, grounded in technology affordance and psychological ownership theories, investigates the interaction effects of service robots’ affordances and contexts on customer engagement, through three scenario-based experimental studies. The results reveal (a) interaction effects of service robots’ (cognitive and physical) affordances and contexts on customers’ engagement behaviors, (b) a serial mediating mechanism involving customers’ cognition (warmth/competence) and psychological ownership, and (c) a positive moderating effect of robots’ anthropomorphic appearance in the effects. This study contributes to theories of service robot affordances, human-robot interaction, and customer engagement in digital contexts. Managers can enhance customer engagement by designing service robots with improved affordances, and strategically matching them with appropriate service contexts.

Keywords

service robot affordances service contexts customer engagement behaviors warmth and competence psychological ownership anthropomorphic appearance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ali

Ruiz-Equihua

Romero

Loureiro

S. M. C.

(2023). Human–robot interactions in the restaurant setting: The role of social cognition, psychological ownership and anthropomorphism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(6), 1966–1985. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0597

Belanche

G. D.

Casaló

L. V.

Schepers

J. J. L.

Flavián

(2021). Examining the effects of robots’ physical appearance, warmth, and competence in frontline services: The Humanness-Value-Loyalty model. Psychology & Marketing, 38(12), 2357–2376. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21532

Binesh

Baloglu

(2023). Motivational, situational, and psychological model of service robot adoption in hotels: The moderating role of involvement. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15, 1603–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01062-5

Boksberger

Dolnicar

Laesser

Randle

(2011). Self-congruity theory: To what extent does it hold in tourism? Journal of Travel Research, 50(4), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510368164

Borghi

Mariani

M. M.

(2024). Asymmetrical influences of service robots’ perceived performance on overall customer satisfaction: An empirical investigation leveraging online reviews. Journal of Travel Research, 63(5), 1086–1111. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231190610

Çalişkan

Sevim

(2025). Use of service robots in hospitality: An observational study in terms of technology acceptance model. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 25(2), 1467–3584. https://doi.org/10.1177/14673584231198438.

Chang

Zhang

(2024). Social cognition of humanoid robots on customer tolerance of service failure. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(7), 2347–2366. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2023-0250

Chi

O. H.

Gursoy

Chi

C. G.

(2022). Tourists’ attitudes toward the use of artificially intelligent (AI) devices in tourism service delivery: The moderating role of service value seeking. Journal of Travel Research, 61(1), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520971054

Chi

Zhang

Pan

(2023). The effect of anthropomorphic competence – Warmth congruence of service robots on recommendation intention. Current Psychology, 43, 6570–6583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04825-5

10.

Choi

M. (Moon)

Kim

S. (Sam)

. (2019). Service robots in hotels: Understanding the service quality perceptions of human-robot interaction. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(6), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2020.1703871

11.

Delgosha

M. S.

Hajiheydari

(2021). How human users engage with consumer robots? A dual model of psychological ownership and trust to explain post-adoption behaviours. Computers in Human Behavior, 117, 106660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106660

12.

Deng

Benckendorff

Wang

(2021). Travel live streaming: An affordance perspective. Information Technology & Tourism, 23(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-021-00199-1

13.

Fan

Mao

Z. (Eddie)

. (2022). To talk or to touch: Unraveling consumer responses to two types of hotel in-room technology. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 101, 103112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103112

14.

Fiske

S.T.

Cuddy

A.J.

Glick

(2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005

15.

Gibson

J. J.

(2014). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.1982.11007570

16.

Grazzini

Viglia

Nunan

(2023). Dashed expectations in service experiences: Effects of robots’ Human-likeness on customers’ responses. European Journal of Marketing, 57(4), 957–986. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2021-0220

17.

Guo

Zhang

Wang

(2016). Effects of customers’ psychological characteristics on their engagement behavior in company social networks. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(10), 1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.2016.44.10.1661

18.

Han

Deng

Fan

(2023). Partners or opponents? How mindset shapes consumers’ attitude toward anthropomorphic artificial intelligence service robots. Journal of Service Research, 26, 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231169674

19.

Harmeling

C. M.

Moffett

J. W.

Arnold

M. J.

Carlson

(2017). Toward a theory of customer engagement marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0509-2

20.

Hollebeek

L. D.

Menidjel

M. C.

Sarstedt

Jansson

Urbonavicius

(2024). Engaging consumers through artificially intelligent technologies: A systematic review, Conceptual Model, and Further Research. Psychology And Marketing, 41(4), 880–898. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21957

21.

Jin

S. V.

Youn

(2023). Social presence and imagery processing as predictors of Chatbot continuance Intention in human-AI-interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1874–1886. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2129277

22.

Ladeira

Perin

M. G.

Santini

(2023). Acceptance of service robots: A meta-analysis in the hospitality and tourism industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 32(6), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2202168

23.

Lee

K. W.

C. Y.

(2023). It is not merely a chat: Transforming Chatbot affordances into dual identification and loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103447

24.

Leung

X. Y.

Zhang

Lyu

Bai

(2023). Why do hotel frontline employees use service robots in the workplace? A technology affordance theory perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 108, 103380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103380

25.

Yao

Nan

(2023). How do friendship artificial intelligence Chatbots (FAIC) benefit the continuance using intention and customer engagement? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(6), 1376–1398. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2218

26.

C. Y.

Fang

Y. H.

Chiang

Y. H.

(2023). Can AI Chatbots help retain customers? An integrative perspective using affordance theory and service-domain logic. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 197, 122921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122921

27.

Song

Shi

Wang

(2022). How human-like behavior of service robot affects social distance: A mediation model and cross-cultural comparison. Behavioral Sciences, 12(7), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070205

28.

Wei

(2021). Antecedents and consequences of hotel customers’ psychological ownership. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 93(3), 102773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102773

29.

Liu

Chen

Huan

T. C.

(2021). Tourism service providers’ physical attractiveness and customers’ service quality evaluation: Is warmth or competence more important? Tourism Review, 76(6), 1260–1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-05-2020-0241

30.

Liu

Xie

(2023). Formal versus casual: How do customers respond to service robots’ uniforms? The roles of service type and language style. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 114, 103566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103566

31.

Liu

(2023). Humor type and service context shape AI service recovery. Annals of Tourism Research, 103, 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103668

32.

Liu

Wan

L. C.

(2022). Friendly or competent? The effects of perception of robot appearance and service context on usage intention. Annals of Tourism Research, 92,103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103324

33.

Pierce

J. L.

Kostova

Dirks

K. T.

(2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/259124

34.

Prentice

Weaven

Wong

I. K. A.

(2020). Linking AI quality performance and customer engagement: The moderating effect of AI preference. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90(8), 102629. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378028

35.

Qin

Zhu

Qiu

(2023). Trust in service robot: The role of appearance anthropomorphism. Current Issues in Tourism, 28(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2023.2295923

36.

Rather

R. A.

Hollebeek

L. D.

Rasoolimanesh

S. M.

(2022). First-time versus repeat tourism Customer engagement, experience, and value cocreation: An empirical investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 61(3), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287521997572

37.

Royo-Vela

Black

(2020). Drone images versus terrain images in advertisements: The images’ verticality effects and the mediating role of mental simulation on attitude towards the advertisement. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1425896

38.

Scarpi

(2024). Strangers or friends? Examining Chatbot adoption in tourism through psychological ownership. Tourism Management, 102, 104873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104873

39.

Shin

Perdue

R. R.

(2023). Developing a multi-dimensional measure of hotel brand customers’ online engagement behaviors to capture non-transactional value. Journal of Travel Research, 62(3), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211073618

40.

Spaccatini

Corlito

Sacchi

(2023). New dyads? The effect of social robots’ anthropomorphization on empathy towards human beings. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107821

41.

Song

Leung

Xi.

Mei

(2024). Service robots and hotel guests’ perceptions: Anthropomorphism and stereotypes. Tourism Review, 79 (2), 505–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-04-2023-0265

42.

Strong

D. M.

Volkoff

Johnson

S. A.

Pelletier

Tulu

(2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(2), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-140255

43.

Tomej

Xiang

(2020). Affordances for tourism service design. Annals of Tourism Research, 85, 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.103029

44.

van Doorn

Mende

Noble

S. M.

Hulland

Ostrom

A. L.

Grewal

Petersen

J. A.

(2017). Domo Arigato Mr. Roboto: Emergence of automated social presence in organizational frontlines and customers’ service experiences. Journal of Service Research, 20(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670516679272

45.

van Doorn

Lemon

K. N.

Mittal

Nass

Pick

Pirner

Verhoef

P. C.

(2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375599

46.

Wang

Chen

Wang

Law

C. H. R.

Zhang

(2024). Exploring the affordances of service robots and the effects on frontline employees in China: A qualitative research in hotels. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15 (5), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-11-2023-0367

47.

Wirtz

Patterson

P. G.

Kunz

W. H.

Gruber

V. N.

Paluch

Martins

(2018). Brave new world: Service robots in the frontline. Journal of Service Management, 29(5), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2018-0119

48.

Yang

Song

Xia

Yang

(2024). Understanding the consequences of robotic interaction quality and outcome quality: A three-phased affordance theory–based approach. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 33(6), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2024.2308531

49.

Yang

Liu

(2021). Anthropomorphism and customers’ willingness to use artificial intelligence service agents. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 31(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1926037

50.

Yao

Wang

Ren

Qiu

(2023). Exploring tourist citizenship behavior in wellness tourism destinations: The role of recovery perception and psychological ownership. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 55, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.03.008

51.

Yoganathan

Osburg

V.-S.

Kunz

W. H.

Toporowski

(2021). Check-in at the robo-desk: Effects of automated social presence on social cognition and service implications. Tourism Management, 85, Article 104309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104309

52.

Yin

Qiu

(2023). Do customers exhibit engagement behaviors in AI environments? The role of psychological benefits and technology readiness. Tourism Management, 97, 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104745

53.

Zhang

Gordon

Buhalis

Ding

(2018). Experience value co-creation on destination online platforms. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1093–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517733557

54.

Zou

Cai

Ran

(2024). Does a cute pet make a difference in home-sharing booking intentions? A moderated serial mediation analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 118, 103666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103666

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.35 MB