This analysis examines fundamental questions at the intersection of social science and social technology as well as problems of disciplinary divisions and the challenge of cross-disciplinary cooperation. Its theoretical-empirical context is provided by post-communist transformations, a set of profound societal changes in which institutional design plays a central role. The article critically reappraises the contribution of Karl Popper’s philosophy to this problem context, examines neoliberalism as social science and social technology, and examines the role of experts and disciplinary divisions in the reform process. Building on Mario Bunge’s social philosophy, it sketches basic elements of a cross-disciplinary approach to “social change by design.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Agassi, Joseph. 1985. Technology: Philosophical and social aspects. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.
2.
Agassi, Joseph. 1987. Methodological individualism and institutional individualism. In Rationality: The critical view, edited by J. Agassi and Ian C. Jarvie, 119-150. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
3.
Albert, Hans. 1976. Aufklärung und Steuerung. Hamburg, Germany: Hoffmann und Campe.
4.
Albert, Hans. 1978. Traktat über rationale Praxis. Tübingen, Germany: J.C.B. Mohr.
5.
Albert, Hans. 1999a. Die Soziologie und das Problem der Einheit der Wissenschaften. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 51:215-31.
6.
Albert, Hans. 1999b. Between social science, religion and politics: Essays in critical rationalism. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Editions Rodopi.
7.
Aslund, Anders. 1995. How Russia became a market economy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
8.
Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1995. Capitalism, socialism, transformation. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
9.
Bartley, W. W.1984. The retreat to commitment. Peru, IL: Open Court.
10.
Berend, Ivan T.1999. Central and Eastern Europe 1945-1993: Detour from the periphery to the periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Bönker, Frank. 1994. External determinants of the patterns and outcomes of East European transitions. Emergo. Journal of Transforming Economies and Societies1 (1): 34-54.
12.
Bunce, Valerie. 1995. Should transitologists be grounded?Slavic Review54 (1): 111-118.
13.
Bunge, Mario. 1996a. Finding philosophy in social science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Bunge, Mario. 1996b. The seven pillars of Popper’s social philosophy. Philosophy of the Social Sciences26:528-557.
15.
Bunge, Mario. 1997. Mechanism and explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences27:410-465.
16.
Bunge, Mario. 1998. Social science under debate. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
17.
Chilton, Patricia. 1995. Mechanics of change: Social movements, transnational coalitions, and the transformation processes in Eastern Europe. In Bringing transnational relations back in: Non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions, edited by Thomas Risse Kappen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1990. Reflections on the revolution in Europe. New York: Random House.
19.
Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Eidlin, Fred. 1997. Blindspot of a liberal: Popper and the problem of community. Philosophy of the Social Sciences27:5-23.
21.
Fischer, Frank. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences26:165-187.
22.
George, Susan. 1999. A short history of neo-liberalism: Twenty years of elite economics and emerging opportunities for structural change. Conference on Economic Sovereignty in a Globalising World, 24-26 March, Bangkok.
23.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
24.
Gowan, Peter. 1995. Neo-liberal theory and practice for Eastern Europe. New Left Review213:3-60.
25.
Grabher, Gernot, and David Stark, eds. 1997. Restructuring networks in post-socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Greskovits, Bela. 1998. The political economy of protest and patience: East European and Latin American transformations compared. Budapest, Hungary: CEU Press.
27.
Hall, Peter A., ed. 1989. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Hayek, Friedrich A.1989. The fatal conceit: The errors of socialism. London: Routledge.
29.
Hirschman, Albert. 1992. Rival views of market society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Conceptions of democracy in the draft constitutions of post-communist countries. In Markets, states, and democracy: The political economy of post-communist transformation, edited by B. Crawford, 82-100. Boulder, CO: Westview.
31.
Isaac, Jeffrey C.1996. The meanings of 1989. Social Research63:291-344.
32.
Jacoby, Wade. 2002. Talking the talk: The cultural and institutional effects of Western models. In Post communist transformation and the social sciences: Cross-disciplinary approaches, edited by F. Bönker, K. Müller, and A. Pickel. Boulder, CO: Rowman and Littlefield.
33.
Jowitt, Ken. 1992. The Leninist legacy. In Eastern Europe in revolution, edited by I. Banac, 207-224. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
Kabele, Jiri, and Ronald Radzai. 1993. The dynamics of social problems and transformations of Czechoslovak society. Social Research60:763-785.
35.
Karl, Terry Lynn, and Philippe C. Schmitter. 1995. From an iron curtain to a paper curtain. Slavic Review54:965-979.
36.
Matzner, Egon, and Ian C. Jarvie. 1998. Papers from the Vienna workshop on Popper’s Situational Analysis and the Social Sciences, part I [Special Issue]. Philosophy of the Social Sciences28 (3).
37.
Merton, Robert K.1968. Social theory and social structure. Enlarged ed. New York: Free Press.
38.
Müller, Klaus. 1995. Vom Post-Kommunismus zur Postmodernität? Zur Erklärung sozialen Wandels in Osteuropa. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 47:37-64.
39.
Murrell, Peter. 1992. Conservative political philosophy and the strategy of economic transition. East European Politics and Society6 (1): 3-16.
40.
Murrell, Peter. 1995. The transition according to Cambridge, Mass. Journal of Economic Literature33:164-169.
41.
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1954. The political element in the development of economic theory. New York: Simon & Schuster.
42.
Offe, Claus. 1991. Die deutsche Vereinigung als “natürliches” experiment. In Experiment Vereinigung: Ein sozialer Grossversuch, edited by B. Giesen and C. Leggewie, 77-86. Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag.
43.
Pickel, Andreas. 1989. Never ask who should rule: Karl Popper and political theory. Canadian Journal of Political Science22:84-105.
44.
Pickel, Andreas. 1992. Radical transitions. The survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
Pickel, Andreas. 1995. Official ideology? The role of neoliberal economic reform doctrines in postcommunist transformation. Polish Sociological Review4:361-375.
46.
Pickel, Andreas. 1997. Neoliberalism, gradualism, and some typical ambiguities and confusions in the transformation debate. New Political Economy2:221-235.
47.
Pickel, Andreas, and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1997. The grand experiment: Debating shock therapy, transition theory, and the East German experience. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48.
Popper, Karl R.1945. The open society and its enemies. 5th ed. 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Popper, Karl R.1957. The poverty of historicism. 2d ed.London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
50.
Popper, Karl R.1963. Conjectures and refutations. 2d ed.New York: Harper & Row.
51.
Popper, Karl R.1970. Normal science and its dangers. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 51-58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Popper, Karl R.1994. The myth of the framework: In defence of science and rationality. Edited by M. A. Notturno. London and New York: Routledge.
53.
Pound, Roscoe. 1922. Introduction to the philosophy of law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
Poznanski, Kazimierz Z., ed. 1995. The evolutionary transition to capitalism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Rona-Tas, Akos. 1997. The great surprise of the small transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
56.
Soros, George. 1998. The crisis of global capitalism: Open society endangered. New York: Perseus Books.
57.
Standing, Guy. 1998. The babble of euphemisms: Re-embedding social protection in “transformed” labour markets. Presented at the Frankfurt Institute of Transformation Studies conference, Postcommunist Transformation and the Social Sciences: Cross-Disciplinary Approaches, 30-31 October, Berlin.
58.
Sullivan, Michael J.1994. The impact of Western political thought in Chinese political discourse, on transitions from Leninism, 1986-1992. World Affairs157 (2): 79-91.
59.
Szacki, Jerzy. 1996. Liberalism after communism. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University Press.
60.
Wedel, Janine R.1998. Collision or collusion? The strange case of Western aid to Eastern Europe, 1989-1999. New York: St. Martin’s.
61.
Wiesenthal, Helmut. 1997. The crisis of holistic policy approaches and the project of controlled system transformation. In The grand experiment: Debating shock therapy, transition theory, and the East German experience, edited by A. Pickel and H. Wiesenthal, 91-113. Boulder, CO: Westview.
62.
Zecchini, Salvatore. 1997. Transition approaches in retrospect. In Lessons from the economic transition: Eastern Europe in the 1990s, edited by S. Zecchini, 1-34. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
