Review Essay: High-Heeled Red Imitation-Crocodile Boots

Abstract

The two works under review attempt to describe the outlines of a post-positivist social science of the future. Against objectivist approaches, these books emphasize the importance of hermeneutics and the cultural turn to the social sciences. Social sciences must recognize collective understandings and human agency. However, while affirming the importance of an interpretivist approach, both of these works also suggest that objective institutional reality must be recognized by social scientists today. Meaningful human agency and objective structure must be encompassed by the social sciences. To this end, critical realism, originally promoted by Roy Bhaskar, figures prominently in both these books precisely because it is a theory which seems to be able to account for both agency and structure simultaneously. In fact, as both these books sometimes demonstrate, the dualistic approach represented by critical realism is flawed. By contrast, the hermeneutic approach advocated by Keith Topper and by some of the contributors to Steinmetz’s collection provides an adequate explanation of institutional social reality in and of itself. Consequently, these books can be interpreted as pointing toward a hermeneutic social science of the future.

Keywords

positivism realism hermeneutics structure and agency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott, A. 2005. The idea of outcome in U.S. sociology. In The politics of method in the human sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Alexander, J. 1984. Theoretical logic in sociology (Vol. 4): The modern reconstruction of classical thought: Talcott Parsons. London: Routledge.

Bhaskar, R. 1979. The possibility of naturalism. Sussex, UK: Harvester.

Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ortner, S. 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Women, culture and society, edited by M. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere . Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Parsons, T. 1937. The structure of social action. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Parsons, T. , R. Bales , and E. Shils . 1953. Working papers in the theory of action. New York: Free Press.

Sewell, W. 2005. The political unconscious of social and cultural history, or, confessions of a former quantitative historian. In The politics of method in the human sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Steinmetz, G. 2005a. Positivism and its others in the social sciences. In The politics of method in the human sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

10.

Steinmetz, G. 2005b. Scientific authority and the transition to post-Fordism: The plausibility of positivism in U.S. sociology since 1945. In The politics of method in the human sciences, edited by G. Steinmetz . Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

11.

Thompson, E. P. 1966. The making of the English working class. New York: Vintage.

12.

Topper, K. 2005. The disorder of political inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.