Since its foundational manifestos, analytical sociologists have stressed the importance of building a catalogue of social mechanisms, understood as a toolbox to provide mechanistic explanations of social phenomena. Despite its centrality, the catalogue has remained largely underdeveloped. We assess and operationalize the idea of such a catalogue of mechanisms by specifying what its construction would entail given analytical sociologists’ other theoretical commitments. We then contrast this operationalization to analytical sociologists’ current practice. We argue that the catalogue project exposes a mismatch between analytical sociology’s empirical successes and how its proponents conceptualize knowledge accumulation and generalization.
ArangurenMartin. 2024. “Adding Experiments to the Classical Survey-Interview Mix: A Three-Method Design for Supporting Micro-To-Macro Explanations in Sociology.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility91: 100933. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2024.100933
2.
ArvidssonMartinColletFrancoisHedströmPeter. 2021. “The Trojan-Horse Mechanism: How Networks Reduce Gender Segregation.” Science Advances7 (16): eabf6730. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf6730.
3.
ArvidssonMartinLovsjöNiclasKeuschniggMarc. 2023. “Urban Scaling Laws Arise from Within-City Inequalities.” Nature Human Behaviour7 (3): 365–74. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01509-1.
4.
BiggsMichael. 2009. “Self-Fulfilling Prophecies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 294–314. Oxford University Press.
ColletFrancoisBruyakaOlgaMakarevichAlexBaudoinLucieWildenRalf. 2024. “Changing Focus: How Status Affects Reputation-Based Comparisons in the Evaluation of Organizations.” Strategic Organization23 (4): 630–58. doi: 10.1177/14761270241229698.
7.
CowanRobinMüllerMoritzKirmanAlanBarnardHelena. 2023. “Overcoming a Legacy of Racial Discrimination: Competing Policy Goals in South African Academia.” Socio-Economic Review22 (3): 1413–49. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwad043.
8.
DuxburyScott W.2024. “Micro Effects on Macro Structure in Social Networks.” Sociological Methodology54 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1177/00811750231209040.
9.
ElsterJon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511812255.
10.
GambettaDiego. 1998. “Concatenations of Mechanisms.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, 102–24. Cambridge University Press.
11.
GlennanStuart. 2005. “Modeling Mechanisms.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C36 (2): 443–64. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.011
12.
GlennanStuart. 2017. The New Mechanical Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
13.
GlennanStuartIllariPhyllisWeberErik. 2022. “Six Theses on Mechanisms and Mechanistic Science.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science53 (2): 143–61. doi: 10.1007/s10838-021-09587-x.
14.
HalinaMarta. 2017. “Mechanistic Explanation and Its Limits.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, edited by GlennanStuartIllariPhyllis, 213–24. Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315731544-16.
15.
HederosKarinSandbergAnnaKvissbergLukasPolanoErik. 2025. “Gender Homophily in Job Referrals: Evidence from a Field Study Among University Students.” Labour Economics92 (January): 102662. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102662.
16.
HedströmPeter. 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge University Press.
17.
HedströmPeterBearmanPeter. 2009. “What Is Analytical Sociology all About? An Introductory Essay.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 3–24. Oxford University Press.
18.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard. 1998a. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press.
19.
HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard. 1998b. “Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, 1–31. Cambridge University Press.
20.
HedströmPeterUdehnLars. 2009. “Analytical Sociology and the Theories of the Middle Range.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 25–47. Oxford University Press.
21.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2010. “Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology36: 49–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632.
22.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2011. “Analytical Sociology.” In The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by JarvieIan C.Zamora-BonillaJesús, 386–98. Sage.
23.
HedströmPeterYlikoskiPetri. 2014. “Analytical Sociology and Rational-Choice Theory.” In Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks, edited by ManzoGianluca, 57–70. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118762707.ch02.
24.
LittleDaniel. 2025. Rethinking Analytical Sociology. Edward Elgar.
25.
MachamerPeterDardenLindleyCraverCarl F.. 2000. “Thinking About Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science67 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1086/392759.
26.
MacyMichaelFlacheAndreas. 2009. “Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-Based Models of Social Interaction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, edited by HedströmPeterBearmanPeter, 245–68. Oxford University Press.
27.
MahoneyJames. 2001. “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.” Sociological Forum16 (3): 575–93.
28.
ManzoGianluca. 2010. “Analytical Sociology and Its Critics.” European Journal of Sociology51 (1): 129–70. doi: 10.1017/S0003975610000056.
29.
ManzoGianluca. 2014. “Data, Generative Models, and Mechanisms: More on the Principles of Analytical Sociology.” In Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks, edited by ManzoGianluca, 4–52. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118762707.ch01.
30.
ManzoGianluca. 2021. “Does Analytical Sociology Practice What It Preaches? An Assessment of Analytical Sociology Through the Merton Award.” In Research Handbook on Analytical Sociology, edited by ManzoGianluca, 1–47. Edward Elgar.
31.
MertonRobert K. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” Antioch Review8 (2): 193–210.
32.
MertonRobert K.1949 (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. 3rd ed.Free Press.
33.
NorkusZenonas. 2005. “Mechanisms as Miracle Makers? The Rise and Inconsistencies of the ‘Mechanismic Approach’ in Social Science and History.” History and Theory44 (3): 348–72. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00329.x
34.
Pérez-GonzálezSaúl. 2020. “Mechanistic Explanations and Components of Social Mechanisms.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science10 (3): 35. doi: 10.1007/s13194-020-00300-1.
35.
PozzoniGianlucaKaidesojaTuukka. 2021. “Context in Mechanism-Based Explanation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences51 (6): 523–54. doi: 10.1177/0048393121991657.
36.
RuoffGabrieleSchneiderGerald. 2006. “Segregation in the Classroom: An Empirical Test of the Schelling Model.” Rationality and Society18 (1): 95–117. doi:10.1177/1043463106060154
37.
SchellingThomas C. 1971. “Dynamic Models of Segregation.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology1 (2): 143–86. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794.
38.
SchellingThomas C. 1998. “Social Mechanisms and Social Dynamics.” In Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, edited by HedströmPeterSwedbergRichard, 32–44. Cambridge University Press.
39.
TapiaEduardo. 2022. “Groups’ Contribution to Shaping Ethnic Residential Segregation: A Dynamic Approach.” Journal of Computational Social Science5 (1): 565–89. doi:10.1007/s42001-021-00136-6
40.
TapiaEduardo. 2023. “Schools’ Priority Rules and Ethnic School Segregation.” British Journal of Sociology of Education44 (2): 331–54. doi: 10.1080/01425692.2022.2154640.
41.
UbarevičienėRūtaHamMaarten vanTammaruTiit. 2024. “Fifty Years After the Schelling’s Models of Segregation: Bibliometric Analysis of the Legacy of Schelling and the Future Directions of Segregation Research.” Cities147 (April): 104838. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2024.104838.
42.
VedresBalázsVásárhelyiOrsolya. 2023. “Inclusion Unlocks the Creative Potential of Gender Diversity in Teams.” Scientific Reports13: 13757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39922-9.
43.
YlikoskiPetriAydinonatN. Emrah. 2014. “Understanding with Theoretical Models.” Journal of Economic Methodology21 (1): 19–36. doi: 10.1080/1350178X.2014.886470.
